Actually we do.
Here's my 2 cents of pholisophy:
Pentax makes cameras and lenses. People who buy a Pentax have made Pentax
(the company) POentax (successful). Pentax makes what we want to buy. If
they didn't, Pentax wouldn't be Pentax.
Or, as Karl Marx once said: The King is merely a King,
Why wouldn't you want to buy a DA lens? In general, they seem to
deliver better performance on the APS sensor cameras than the full
frame lenses. Do you shoot a lot of film?
Paul
On Dec 31, 2006, at 12:24 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Not quite there for me Boris. I'm not keen on the empty
Pay attention Paul :-)
Boris went through his reasons not too long ago.
Cheers,
Dave
On 12/31/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why wouldn't you want to buy a DA lens? In general, they seem to
deliver better performance on the APS sensor cameras than the full
frame lenses. Do you
Huh?
Dave
On 12/31/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually we do.
Here's my 2 cents of pholisophy:
Pentax makes cameras and lenses. People who buy a Pentax have made Pentax
(the company) POentax (successful). Pentax makes what we want to buy. If
they didn't, Pentax wouldn't be
On 12/31/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why wouldn't you want to buy a DA lens? In general, they seem to
deliver better performance on the APS sensor cameras than the full
frame lenses. Do you shoot a lot of film?
Paul, I opine that no DA lens, be it zoom or prime or even limited
Hey, I barely remember what I did yesterday:-)
Paul
On Dec 31, 2006, at 7:18 AM, David Savage wrote:
Pay attention Paul :-)
Boris went through his reasons not too long ago.
Cheers,
Dave
On 12/31/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why wouldn't you want to buy a DA lens? In
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello MARK,
It has been a long time since I last heard you on the list. Good to
know you are still around.
Hey Bruce,
Yep, it's me. I usually monitor from the archive but figured I'd sign on for
a little while. I
I write this in the year 2007. see ya here in 24 hours :)
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Dec 30, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
However, if you add enough ethanol (or methanol) to raise the octane
sufficiently and control detonation, you end up with a distressingly
low power fuel. Thus, you consume more to go the same distance. There
are no easy answers.
Yes, but if
And peace on earth (and PDML :-)
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hello Bob
I don't have these. But I do have two older pairs of Asahi Pentax bins:
9x30 and 8x40. Both quite old (1995, 1975). And both excellent.
I have bought both of them used and payed only 50-100 USD for each pair.
I believe 8 times enlargement is perhaps often not quite enough for bird
Hehe, sorry oo, oo, ah ah, John, dang, some chimpanzee was
coming out of me. I dropped that thing right on concrete last
night at a wedding and the front lens housing oo, oo, ah, ah,
flew right off, did manage to get it back on and working, lol.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: John
There's a lot of what I'd call shadow noise in places were there aren't
much in the way of shadows. Maybe you should have biased a bit in favor
of over exposure to try to eliminate that.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yes, I'm moving toward a second K10D as well. The D is nice, but not
as nice as
On Dec 31, 2006, at 4:31 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
... see no reason whatsoever ...
Well, I disagree with that. But by all means, the FA Limited lenses
are excellent performers. Take pictures and enjoy them if you're
happy with them.
Personally, though, nice though the optics of the FA31
I want to take this moment to say best wishes, good health and good
fortunes for all in the year to come.
I hope you have all had a fine holiday season this year, and look
forward to our continued conversation and discussion in the year to
come.
best,
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hi,
thanks for replying. I am kind of veering towards the 10x50s, although
they are rather more than I really want to pay for fairly casual use.
This is because of the combination of magnification and brightness,
but then there is a reduced field of view.
I'm given to understand that anything
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi Subject: Re: PESO - Hertzlia Marina vs K10D
Beyond that, I don't share your belief that the 16x24 format is
temporary. Nor do I see any particular need for 24x36 format,
either film or digital. That format choice is arbitrary, based on
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling Subject: Re: PESO: Pretty Girls
There's a lot of what I'd call shadow noise in places were there aren't
much in the way of shadows. Maybe you should have biased a bit in favor
of over exposure to try to eliminate that.
1600 is a four stop
OMG, Time machines are the new wave of the future?
On Dec 31, 2006, at 8:22 AM, jim wrote:
I write this in the year 2007. see ya here in 24 hours :)
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hey Godfrey. Somehow I knew you would reply.
Well, I disagree with that. But by all means, the FA Limited lenses
are excellent performers. Take pictures and enjoy them if you're
happy with them.
Please apply the same argument to you ;-). You like other lenses and
you obtain truly excellent
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman Subject: Re: PESO - Hertzlia Marina vs K10D
Please apply the same argument to you ;-). You like other lenses and
you obtain truly excellent pictures with them. That I would call
diversity and that's of course a great thing. Imagine one had
Beyond that, I don't share your belief that the 16x24 format is
temporary. Nor do I see any particular need for 24x36 format,
either film or digital. That format choice is arbitrary, based on
historical accident. There are certainly gains to be had in some
cases, but based on what
I wish I had said that..
In fact, I think I'll just sign my name below, and pretend that I am erudite
as well.
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi Subject: Happy New Year to all
I want to take this moment to say best wishes, good health and good
fortunes for all in the
On Dec 31, 2006, at 8:52 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Now, I can argue that you already admitted you prefer 77 and 43 to 70
and 40 respectively, but that would be plain silly.
And it's not much of an argument, Boris. :-)
- I have not purchased a 43 Limited. I sold the FA31 Limited because
I
Nice, simple, good lines.
I like it
Dave
Quoting Eric Featherstone [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Just trying to keep the PESO density up a bit ;-)
The garden is in the grounds of Kodaiji, a
temple in the eastern hills of Kyoto, Japan. It can just about be seen
on Google maps in amongst a
Bob W wrote:
thanks for replying. I am kind of veering towards the 10x50s, although
they are rather more than I really want to pay for fairly casual use.
This is because of the combination of magnification and brightness,
but then there is a reduced field of view.
I'm given to understand
I'll add my name to.:-)
Hope everyone is successful at what ever you do, and looking forward
to a great list in 2007.
Dave
Quoting William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wish I had said that..
In fact, I think I'll just sign my name below, and pretend that I am erudite
as well.
-
Hi!
Now, I can argue that you already admitted you prefer 77 and 43 to 70
and 40 respectively, but that would be plain silly.
And it's not much of an argument, Boris. :-)
Of course it is not ;-).
- I have not purchased a 43 Limited. I sold the FA31 Limited because
I didn't like it very
Welcome back, Mark. And congratulations on the DS. It's a great camera.
Paul
On Dec 31, 2006, at 8:56 AM, Mark Dalal wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello MARK,
It has been a long time since I last heard you on the list. Good to
know you are still
Hi!
Please apply the same argument to you ;-). You like other lenses and
you obtain truly excellent pictures with them. That I would call
diversity and that's of course a great thing. Imagine one had to
choose only from one option for every photographing situation. That
would be rather poor
Happy for you Mike.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Mike Hamilton wrote:
Well, I opened up the local newspaper (the Edmonton Journal) and found
two of my photos published on the front page of the City section! I'd
been interviewed last week, and although they didn't publish
A bit more exposure would have helped with the noise, but I was
running out of light. I was shooting wide open at 200mm at only
1/60th, ISO 1600. It was almost dark. So no exposure comp. What's
more, this is a pretty extreme crop. It's a compromise in other
words. Probably not worth
Count me in ;-).
David J Brooks wrote:
I'll add my name to.:-)
Hope everyone is successful at what ever you do, and looking forward
to a great list in 2007.
Dave
Quoting William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wish I had said that..
In fact, I think I'll just sign my name below,
I'm at work tonight. Somebody got to keep the wheels going round.
But I have managed to sneak off to say Happy new year to my family and to
you folks.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey
Nice save :-)
It's amazing, isn't it, that digital cameras are now almost
throwaway technology - HP can afford to sell you one at that
price because they anticipate making enough extra profit on
ink for the printer bundled in with the camera. And a 6MP
camera should be capable of making some
Hi!
At first I thought I would have to part with this flash I am having. But
good for me (and other I think) it works fine in M mode. It fires at
full power all the time so that by dialing proper aperture value one can
still get properly exposed shots. Not as good as proper TTL but still
This is interesting. Not that the lack of sharpness bothers me in this shot.
But generally it is interesting. Have others experienced this, that SR in
some situations blurs the image? And if so, in what situations?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From:
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman Subject: Re: PESO - Hertzlia Marina vs K10D
Yes of course. But I am using my FA lenses and both having fun and
getting rather good (at least for me) results. Why would I want to fix
it in any way?
Not fix, so much as limit oneself to
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 07:56:45AM -0600, Mark Dalal wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello MARK,
It has been a long time since I last heard you on the list. Good to
know you are still around.
Hey Bruce,
Yep, it's me. I usually monitor
I just red this post on the photo.net pentax forum on IR shots with
the K10D. The fellow used a hoya R72 and long exposure times. He
posted three examples shot with the 16-45 that look good.
I'm not sure this link will work.
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00JKfjtag=
If
I think that the universe abhors time machines, whenever one is
invented, the indenter invariably uses it to go back and accidentally
prevents it from being invented...
William Kane wrote:
OMG, Time machines are the new wave of the future?
On Dec 31, 2006, at 8:22 AM, jim wrote:
I
And didn't you just add the 12-24? It's a superb lens with a nice
wide fov.
Paul
On Dec 31, 2006, at 2:05 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman Subject: Re: PESO - Hertzlia Marina vs K10D
Yes of course. But I am using my FA lenses and both having fun
George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just red this post on the photo.net pentax forum on IR shots with
the K10D. The fellow used a hoya R72 and long exposure times. He
posted three examples shot with the 16-45 that look good.
If anything it proves that IR with the K10D sure isn't the
I wonder if he is using f22 or such, to get such a long exposure. Or
maybe the filter is less sensitive than the D family.
I have been using iso 200 at 4 sec and f 8-11 with my 16-45 and istD.
I'll have to test my K10. Its been IR unfriendly weather here latly.
Dave
Quoting George Sinos
On Dec 31, 2006, at 9:12 AM, William Robb wrote:
Has anyne else noticed that the DA lens mount still has a slot for the
aperture simulator lever?
That just says to me that either they have an umpteen bazillion of
these lens mount components pre-machined in stock (they don't need to
be any
The curious thing is that, by the rules of relativity, time machines
can exist but you can only travel forwards in time, backwards is not
possible.
G
On Dec 31, 2006, at 11:36 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I think that the universe abhors time machines, whenever one is
invented, the indenter
I don't think any of this proves a thing.
On Dec 31, 2006, at 2:54 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just red this post on the photo.net pentax forum on IR shots with
the K10D. The fellow used a hoya R72 and long exposure times. He
posted three examples
what they said
ann
William Robb wrote:
I wish I had said that..
In fact, I think I'll just sign my name below, and pretend that I am erudite
as well.
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi Subject: Happy New Year to all
I want to take this moment to say best wishes,
I think Boris was asking about the lack of the lens makernote data in
the K10D RAW/DNG files.
Well, I have confirmed that DS files, both PEF and DNG created by DNG
Converter, include this information and that Adobe Photoshop/Bridge/
Camera Raw and Lightroom interpret it correctly. The K10D
Happy, happy all.
Paul
On Dec 31, 2006, at 3:05 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
what they said
ann
William Robb wrote:
I wish I had said that..
In fact, I think I'll just sign my name below, and pretend that I
am erudite
as well.
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
and since we're going forwards anyway, what's the point?
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 31 December 2006 19:50
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: happy new year
The curious thing is that,
I'll add my best wishes, as well.
GS
On 12/31/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to take this moment to say best wishes, good health and good
fortunes for all in the year to come.
I hope you have all had a fine holiday season this year, and look
forward to our continued
Has anyne else noticed that the DA lens mount still has a
slot for the
aperture simulator lever?
That just says to me that either they have an umpteen bazillion of
these lens mount components pre-machined in stock (they don't
need to
be any different for FA or DA lens contacts,
Time zones allow a form of time travel. If you fly from Detroit to
Sydney Australia, you will arrive almost two days later even though
the flight is less than 20 hours. And i've flow from Auckland, New
Zealand to Los Angles and arrived in L.A. on the same date, four
hours earlier than I
Hi folks,
the January PUG is open.
It can be viewed on http://pug.komkon.org
Happy new year all around.
Best
Adelheid
--
Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen!
Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think any of this proves a thing.
Aha?
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan. 10, 2005
Contarex - Kiev 60 - Horizon 202 - P6 mount
Obviously, no tougher test than ISO 1600 in fading light against a
shadowy darkish blotched background.
If this is an example of how bad it can get..I'm certainly OK with it.
I, also, appreciate your choice of subjects, Paul. 8-)
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A bit more
Aha.
On Dec 31, 2006, at 3:29 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think any of this proves a thing.
Aha?
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries -
Thanks Jack. Instinctively, I shot it as a vertical. But as you can
see, there was a garbage can a left, so I had to crop it horizontal.
But that gives us a tighter image area in which to count pixels:-).
Paul
On Dec 31, 2006, at 3:43 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Obviously, no tougher test than ISO
Looking good!
and Happy New Year to you as well, my dear
fondly,
ann
AvK wrote:
Hi folks,
the January PUG is open.
It can be viewed on http://pug.komkon.org
Happy new year all around.
Best
Adelheid
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 12/30/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope they gave you credit.
Yes, they did credit both photos, and plugged my website also!
Thanks to you all.
--
Cheers,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MichaelHamilton.ca
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Dec 31, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Bob W wrote:
Has anyne else noticed that the DA lens mount still has a
slot for the
aperture simulator lever?
That just says to me that either they have an umpteen bazillion of
these lens mount components pre-machined in stock (they don't
need to
be any
What kind of camera does James Stewart wield in Hitchcock's Rear
Window. He mounts something like a 400mm lens to shoot the salesman
neighbor with the butcher knife and saw. The pentaprism is obviously
taped over. It's a very early SLR. Doesn't look like a Pentax, and
the lens certainly
Apparently it's an Exakta. There's more about it than anybody could
possibly want to know here:
http://photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=009F9ptag=
One of my favourite films, though, and the main characters are
apparently based on Bob Capa and Ingrid Bergman.
--
Bob
-Original
Just like flashguns used to work back in the 1950s!
A Happy New Year to all.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
At first I thought I would have to part with this flash I am
having. But
William Kane wrote:
OMG, Time machines are the new wave of the future?
And they always will be!
(Either that or, as the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy notes, Time
travel, by its very nature, was invented at *all* points in history
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Bob W wrote:
Conversely I'd expect to be able to put more pixels on a larger area,
but there seems to be some limiting factor that prevents the
widespread use of 24x36 (or perhaps it's just a Machiavellian
marketing trick to make people buy new lenses).
The limit is that the pixel sites on
Speaking of time machines. Mark. I'm running mine fast forward, because I'm
waiting for your annual quote treat. Plese.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
Roberts
Sent: 31. desember 2006
Taken near my in-law's house, it is the front door of a community
thrift store.
Pentax K10D, Tamron 90/2.8 Macro
ISO 200, 1/60 sec @ f/9.5
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4203a.htm
Comments welcom
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Paul Stenquist wrote:
What kind of camera does James Stewart wield in Hitchcock's Rear
Window. He mounts something like a 400mm lens to shoot the salesman
neighbor with the butcher knife and saw. The pentaprism is obviously
taped over. It's a very early SLR. Doesn't look like a Pentax,
I thought it resembled a Praktica IV, but the prism is wrong. Follow
a few of the links in the thread Brain referenced. Exakta is probably
right.
On 12/31/06, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll have to dig up my copy and have a look. In the meantime, this
discussion suggests
I'll have to dig up my copy and have a look. In the meantime, this discussion
suggests Exakta.
http://photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00E1dZ
(you can find out anything with Google :-) )
Cheers and Happy 2007
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney
Nicely captured Bruce. I'll bet they'd like a copy of that.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Community Thrift Relief Store
Taken near my in-law's house, it is the front door of a community
thrift store.
Pentax K10D, Tamron
Thanks Bob. I'm watching it now.
Paul
On Dec 31, 2006, at 4:37 PM, Bob W wrote:
Apparently it's an Exakta. There's more about it than anybody could
possibly want to know here:
http://photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=009F9ptag=
One of my favourite films, though, and the main
What he said plus ...
may the light be with you may all your exposures be right on!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 11:49 AM
Subject: Happy New Year to all
I want to take this moment to say best wishes,
Taken on Danforth Ave in Toronto a few weeks ago.
I came around the corner and saw this group. Right up my alley, so i
HAD to get this one.:-)
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5393753
Comments welcome
K10D, 16-45, minor PS adjustment and sharpen.
Dave
Equine Photography in York
Nice composition Bruce
Dave
Quoting Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Taken near my in-law's house, it is the front door of a community
thrift store.
Pentax K10D, Tamron 90/2.8 Macro
ISO 200, 1/60 sec @ f/9.5
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4203a.htm
Comments welcom
--
Bruce
--
At 9am on New Years Day after celebrating the New Year with some friends until
about 2:30am, I'm not actually sure I can find my 'brain'. :-)
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I thought it
Cool pic. Nice angle.
Paul
On Dec 31, 2006, at 5:14 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Taken on Danforth Ave in Toronto a few weeks ago.
I came around the corner and saw this group. Right up my alley, so i
HAD to get this one.:-)
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5393753
Comments welcome
Nicely composed. Good verticals:-)
Paul
On Dec 31, 2006, at 4:54 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Taken near my in-law's house, it is the front door of a community
thrift store.
Pentax K10D, Tamron 90/2.8 Macro
ISO 200, 1/60 sec @ f/9.5
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4203a.htm
Comments welcom
That seems to be the consensus. The film just ended. Fantastic. I
hadn't seen it in at least thirty years. Certainly one of the best
films of all time. Wow.
Paul
On Dec 31, 2006, at 4:55 PM, Christian wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
What kind of camera does James Stewart wield in Hitchcock's
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I want to take this moment to say best wishes, good health and good
fortunes for all in the year to come.
I hope you have all had a fine holiday season this year, and look
forward to our continued conversation and discussion in the year to
come.
best,
Godfrey
On 01/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think any of this proves a thing.
It was discussed on dpreview in the first few days the camera was
actually in users hands, frankly I as inferred I hope its IR
sensitivity sucks. I've had too many IR induced colour problems due to
the
On 31/12/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the grain on that shot reminds me of the type of grain that cheap
Kodak ISO 200 film used to have. I disliked it and stopped using the
film for that reason, but it's interesting to see it replicated
digitally.
I'm not particularly enamoured with the
Just to demonstrate that the heavy noise seen in the pic of the two
girls isn't native to the K10D, here's a shot from about 20 minutes
previous when there was still some light. This one is with the DA
50-100 at 150 mm, ISO 1600, f6.3 @ 1/160th, but not underexposed.
Thanks Rob, that makes sense. It's much more clear than aha? :-))
Perhaps my D will become my IR camera. I think I'll try the same shot
with both bodies and see what I get.
Paul
On Dec 31, 2006, at 5:56 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 01/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
it was never like this on Brokeback Mountain!
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/6447/2963/1600/rifleman.jpg
git 'em up!
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Happy New Year to all. May it bring you happiness, the rewards and
satisfaction you seek, and peace - both personal and national.
Regards, Bob S.
On 12/31/06, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of time machines. Mark. I'm running mine fast forward, because I'm
waiting for your
Nice shot. I'm not sure it's that much of a solution when you read
about the state of the streets of London and other large cities when
horses were the main means of transports.
And think of the poor sods who had to work as crossing sweepers. This
is Mervyn Peake's drawing of Dickens's Jo, the
That figures!
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of mike wilson
Sent: 31 December 2006 18:42
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - Hertzlia Marina vs K10D
Bob W wrote:
Conversely I'd expect to be able to put
I got it at my local craft and art store - foam cutouts are the new fad
(taking over from felt) so the basic foam material is pretty common
Rod
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Markus Maurer
Hi David
that was me as well:
ray guns?
police boxes that are bigger on the inside than the outside?
bannannas?
On Dec 31, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Bob W wrote:
and since we're going forwards anyway, what's the point?
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Godfrey
Yes, that looks like what I'm getting with proper exposures. It's
pretty clean.
G
On Dec 31, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Just to demonstrate that the heavy noise seen in the pic of the two
girls isn't native to the K10D, here's a shot from about 20 minutes
previous when there
William Robb wrote:
I wish I had said that..
In fact, I think I'll just sign my name below, and pretend that I am erudite
as well.
As what?
keith
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi Subject: Happy New Year to all
I want to take this moment to say best wishes,
I hope 2007 is a happy and rewarding time for you all.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Bob W wrote:
it was never like this on Brokeback Mountain!
...I'll take your word for it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 01/01/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Rob, that makes sense. It's much more clear than aha? :-))
Perhaps my D will become my IR camera. I think I'll try the same shot
with both bodies and see what I get.
I've been toying with the thought of converting my *ist D to a true
Hi William and Jens
The foam he uses seems to be a more flexible solution than paper and the
Metz one because it can be bent in any position.
I will have a loook for some material.
happy new year.
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Many thanks for these profiles and the installation comment - at the moment
this is 'Cutting Edge' for me :))
Rod
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Savage
G'day Boris
C:\Documents and Settings\USER\Application
Happy New Year 2007 all:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594450794489/show/
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.16.0/610 - Release Date: 12/30/2006
--
PDML
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
