On 1/3/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 04/01/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Psalm 146:4 states: His spirit goes out, he goes back to his ground; in
that day his thoughts do perish.
In addition the concept of an immortal soul with a conciousness that
survives
Walter Hamler wrote:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/HDHweb.jpg
Maybe use it in an upcoming camera club contest.
K10D, FE zoom at 10mm
Walt
Point, Game, Set and Match! Quintessentially American! ;-)
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi Ralf
I looked up the camera and found pictures on a ebay sale. This is indeed an
impressive and nice one.
Could you explain how you measure the exposure time in such a shot? Is it
based pure on experience or do you bracket or do you have some other secret
;-)
Could you show an example of a
Hi!
You need to like dogs for this one.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/recent/bigtongue.html
I takes a long tongue to enjoy this kind of a bone, right? ;-)
I decided to do my own full moon picture tonight. I don't know why.
This was shot with the K10 behind the A600/5.6
I f you have another tele converter I would like to see shots at 2400mm :-)
Have you done any wildlife photography (not Jester!) with that lens yet or
what will you use it for?
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
William Robb
On 3/1/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm a
fan of photo vests as well. They look a little geeky, but they work well if
you just want to carry a couple of lenses and some small bric-brac.
Good point. Oddly enough I wear mine for work (I have several in
storage, break a new one
Why should Sigma do it? They didn't do that for Minolta A mount,
althought Minolta (now Sony) SSM lenses has existed for about ten years.
On 04.01.2007, at 00:41 , Thibouille wrote:
* I really don't think Sigma will go that route. If they do SDM
lenses, they will be SDM-only.
Cheers,
Sylwek
Doesn't that somehow just ask for a specific noise profile for the K10D for
the noise reduction software or are you profiling each image or just use the
defaults on the blue channel?
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Bruce
The backpack style are not convenient to work out of. Conversely, the
over-the-shoulder style are not convenient for carrying. I have 3 bags
which I used most often: Domke F2, LowePro Street Field Reporter
300, and LowePro SF Rover AW backpack.
The F2 is good for when I need to carry 2-3 SLRs
On 3/1/07, Norm Baugher, discombobulated, unleashed:
Your wife know about this?
She knows *everything*. Don't you know that all wives have a gene found
only in forensic scientists?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/03 Wed PM 10:56:00 GMT
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Taking Pentax Gear to the Edge
On 3/1/07, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Indeed. I have a friend who used to own a Big Healey
Amazing. At a set of traffic
In the end they will because if they do they will be able to develop
lens with only one AF system... lower costs - they will do it IMO.
2007/1/4, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why should Sigma do it? They didn't do that for Minolta A mount,
althought Minolta (now Sony) SSM lenses has
On 1/4/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
The backpack is useful if I'm going for a long walk, or travelling. I
used it when I travelled around South India, but I found it rather
inconvenient to work from, so I stopped doing that.
bob,
just curious, where exactly in south india? i will
Yes Godfrey if you re-read my post (maybe I wasn't clear enough):
DS does support TTL with 'external' flash but not RTF.
D does support TTL anyway
Every other DSLRs do only PTTL.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One of my brothers has just bought a Mercedes SLK 350:
http://www2.mercedes-benz.co.uk/content/unitedkingdom/mpc/mpc_unitedki
ngdom_website/en/home_mpc/passenger_cars/home/products/new_cars/slk_cl
ass_roadster_facelift/models.html
...which is a real
Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you explain how you measure the exposure time in such a shot? Is it
based pure on experience or do you bracket or do you have some other secret
Bracket? Oh sure. I start with one hour and then go -2, -1, +1, +2
stops. Works only in winter because
(Damn, I was hoping for the time machine...)
That was sold on Ebay I while back IIRC :)
John
The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed and may
Excellent, and not at all boring. I see no significant noise problems
in any of these. Great detail. Grace, who fancies the moon, is going to
love them. By the way, don't disparage moon pics. I sold one that
wasn't quite as good as these for over $200 through my stock house.
Paul
On Jan 3,
On 04/01/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I researched this a fair bit a while back, out of historical interest.
Did you discover anything interesting?
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/4/07, John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Damn, I was hoping for the time machine...)
That was sold on Ebay I while back IIRC :)
By your future self?
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks Boris. Wasn't expecting much here, but when I opened it in the
bridge, I liked what I saw. The reflections fell in the right place.
Paul
On Jan 4, 2007, at 2:52 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
K10D in Tva mode with FA 50/1.4, f6.7 @ 1/125th, ISO 400
I find that the D is also quite noisy when underexposed at high ISO.
Perhaps somewhat less, but I can't say for sure without testing. It's
close.
Paul
On Jan 3, 2007, at 11:59 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I saw some blue channel noise when I shot at 1600 ISO and underexposed
too much. It seemed
That was sold on Ebay I while back IIRC :)
By your future self?
Dave
LOL
John
The information transmitted is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed and may contain
On Jan 3, 2007, at 16:49, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
If you were going to buy anything more sophisticated than the Vivitar
285 or Sunpak 383, buy either the Pentax AF360FGZ or AF540FGZ.
Personally, I haven't yet seen the need ... I use the Sunpak 383 and
get excellent results from it.
I
On Jan 3, 2007, at 7:25 PM, John Francis wrote:
Within the US, if you are a working photographer, you are entitled
to a camera bag in addition to the normal carry-on allowance. You are
also entitled to have any film (whatever that is :-) hand inspected.
Yes, but that is only a TSA ruling
On Jan 3, 2007, at 10:16 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Very interesting stuff. Anyone else watching it?
http://www.pbs.org/previews/am-leibovitz/
I had work to do so I taped it. I'll watch it on the weekend.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 1/3/07, Daniel J. Matyola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very interesting stuff. Anyone else watching it?
http://www.pbs.org/previews/am-leibovitz/
I was too busy watching my beloved Fighting Irish go down to defeat to
LSU (who played a great game, BTW) in the SugarBowl. At about 10:30
my time,
On 1/3/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only the kind of clubs that allow Norm and Bill in. shudder
Like PDML?shudder
-frank
;-)
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Jan 4, 2007, at 4:04 AM, mike wilson wrote:
He should have gone to Poland and bought himself something _really_
unusual - a Mercedes Vision concept car built from an old taxi.
http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=848531page=1
I get an error message: The Requested URL Was Not Found
On Jan 4, 2007, at 3:19 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
I actually just picked up a Sunpak 383 for $10 and find that, for the
most part, I like it better than my Sigma EF-500 DG Super.
It lacks a few features that the Sigma has (High-speed sync, second-
curtian flash) for which I'll keep the
Hi Bruce,
I find this a somewhat odd photo. I don't see the Norman Rockell
comparison except as it being a scene from contemporary life, and that's
even a bit of a stretch for me. That the woman is wearing short-ish jeans
and warm boots is interesting, and gave me a little chuckle.
You
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So how well does TTL work on DS? What does one lose from P-TTL?
P-TTL with the built in flash does pretty well if you are not one of
those people whose eye-blink reflex timing is a problem.
How about with a flash on the hot shoe? How would the DS do
On Jan 4, 2007, at 5:25 AM, Mark Dalal wrote:
So how well does TTL work on DS? What does one lose from P-TTL?
P-TTL with the built in flash does pretty well if you are not one of
those people whose eye-blink reflex timing is a problem.
How about with a flash on the hot shoe? How would the
On 1/04/07 2:40 AM, Markus Maurer, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do some lenses go over infinity focus? What is that good for?
IIRC, this is done to compensate for the thermal expansion/contraction.
This is more profound in barrels made of aluminum such as Limiteds.
Longer FL lenses must have
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Thibouille wrote:
Not exactly ... the DS does support TTL with pre-A lens AFAIK but only
with external flashes. the RTF will do PTTL or full output. The D can
do TTL even with RTF flash and old M42 lens.
Everuthinf from DL, DL2 etc and newer do NOT support TTL in ANY way.
Cotty wrote:
On 3/1/07, Norm Baugher, discombobulated, unleashed:
Your wife know about this?
She knows *everything*. Don't you know that all wives have a gene found
only in forensic scientists?
Imagine what it's like living with a woman who *is* a forensic
scientist!
(Well, she used to do
For those interested in this matter, some comparison images samples between
two lenses.
This is a Chinese site and often heavy depending on time. Scroll near mid
section to see samples.
http://digi.163.com/06/1103/10/2V0DUTSQ001618EI.html
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Markus Maurer wrote:
Why do some lenses go over infinity focus? What is that good for?
greetings
Markus
For AF lenses, it allows for overshoot in the AF control
algorithm. That will make for a faster and more accurate AF lock than if
the lens hits a hard stop
Maybe he meant Ken Rockwell?
Dave ;-)
On 1/4/07, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I find this a somewhat odd photo. I don't see the Norman Rockell
comparison except as it being a scene from contemporary life, and that's
even a bit of a stretch for me. That the woman is
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 3/1/07, Norm Baugher, discombobulated, unleashed:
Your wife know about this?
She knows *everything*. Don't you know that all wives have a gene found
only in forensic scientists?
Imagine what it's like living with a woman who *is* a forensic
Bruce,
I forgot to mention that I see a distinct bluish cast to the photo. Do you
see that on your system as well? It's understandable given the scene, but
I cannot help wonder if it's intentional or if you just didn't see it.
Shel
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/snow2006_56a.htm
--
PDML
My preference is always for backpacks over shoulder bags. I have made
3 purchases over the years, and the most important factor for me has
been to have enough volume to cover present needs, but not more.
I recall when buying a pack for my 645 gear, I looked at various
models online, and tried to
Don't get too excited.
I've been told to dispose of (i.e. throw in a skip) most of the text books
here. So if you want any newish (up to about 20years old) biology, chemistry
or physics texts, they are yours for the postage.
Mostly for the 16-18 age group. Too many to list specific
On Jan 4, 2007, at 5:49 AM, K.Takeshita wrote:
For those interested in this matter, some comparison images samples
between
two lenses.
This is a Chinese site and often heavy depending on time. Scroll
near mid
section to see samples.
Thanks for the link Ken.
I prefer the bokeh of the 77.
Dave
On 1/4/07, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those interested in this matter, some comparison images samples between
two lenses.
This is a Chinese site and often heavy depending on time. Scroll near mid
section to see
On 1/4/07, Mark Dalal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So how well does TTL work on DS? What does one lose from P-TTL?
P-TTL with the built in flash does pretty well if you are not one of
those people whose eye-blink reflex timing is a problem.
How
I gather the 1600 ISO is the third shot down? Nice image and, at a
quick glance, the sharpest of the group. Likely a faster shutter.(?)
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While the fellas were out for their evening constitutional, I looked
at the
heavens and saw a very clear sky
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/04 Thu PM 12:55:11 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Taking Pentax Gear to the Edge
On Jan 4, 2007, at 4:04 AM, mike wilson wrote:
He should have gone to Poland and bought himself something _really_
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/04 Thu PM 02:07:04 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Occupations?
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 3/1/07, Norm Baugher, discombobulated, unleashed:
Your wife know about this?
She knows
For carrying lots of gear a backpack my be the better option, but when
just walking around town, I don't like having to take the bag off to
get at my gear.
For this reason I like my Crumpler 6 Million Dollar Home. It's a
shoulder bag (that doesn't look like a camera bag BTW), I wear with
the
On 1/4/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/04 Thu PM 02:07:04 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Occupations?
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 3/1/07, Norm Baugher, discombobulated,
Mark Roberts wrote:
My brother worked at a computer shop for a while and they
had a saying: The only thing anyone knows for sure about computers is
that computers suck. :-)
more specifically, every OS sucks:
http://www.deadtroll.com/index2.html?/video/ossuckscable.html~content
--
Has anyone tried any of the 'sling' bags? Say the Lowepro Slingshot 200 AW
?
- Peter
- Original Message -
From: Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: Bag for GFM Outing
My preference is always
http://www.heelysdealer.co.uk/shoes.shtml
My questions are what mother would allow their child to wear something
so obviously dangerous in this day of, (what I can only refer to as),
Safety Nazism? What tort lawyer isn't salivating just looking at
these things?
mike wilson wrote:
From:
Interesting. The DA 70 appears to be slightly sharper, particularly at the
edges, but the FA 77 has smoother bokeh.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For those interested in this matter, some comparison images samples between
two
The difference in bokeh is, in my opinion, more due to the additional
focal length of the FA77 than anything else.
G
On Jan 4, 2007, at 6:38 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. The DA 70 appears to be slightly sharper, particularly
at the edges, but the FA 77 has smoother bokeh.
The AF280T seems to work fine on the Ds in TTL mode. It's not as
powerful as I would like since the Ds is much like the D in that TTL
flash works best at ISO 400.
Mark Dalal wrote:
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So how well does TTL work on DS? What does one lose from P-TTL?
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer Subject: RE: A couple of PESOs
Why do some lenses go over infinity focus? What is that good for?
greetings
It allows the lens barrel to expand if it builds up heat inside it, and
still allow infinity focus.
William Robb
--
PDML
On Jan 4, 2007, at 5:50 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
So just to clarify... the -DS manual stating that P-TTL NOT
working with A (or pre-A?) is a typo? An external P-TTL flash does
indeed
work properly with A lenses or older?
The DS manual has a couple of discrepancies where it
Can't be, they look white, not like boiled lobsters.
-Adam
David Savage wrote:
Maybe he meant Ken Rockwell?
Dave ;-)
On 1/4/07, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I find this a somewhat odd photo. I don't see the Norman Rockell
comparison except as it being a scene
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer Subject: RE: Let Me Bore You a Second Time
I f you have another tele converter I would like to see shots at 2400mm :-)
Have you done any wildlife photography (not Jester!) with that lens yet or
what will you use it for?
I have a 2XS
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis Subject: Re: Let Me Bore You a Second Time
I gather the 1600 ISO is the third shot down? Nice image and, at a
quick glance, the sharpest of the group. Likely a faster shutter.(?)
Thanks Jack. I adjusted the shutter speed up as I ramped up the
mike wilson wrote:
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/01/04 Thu PM 02:07:04 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Occupations?
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 3/1/07, Norm Baugher, discombobulated, unleashed:
Your wife know about this?
She knows
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist Subject: Re: Let Me Bore You a Second Time
Excellent, and not at all boring. I see no significant noise problems
in any of these. Great detail. Grace, who fancies the moon, is going to
love them. By the way, don't disparage moon pics. I sold
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff Subject: RE: PESO - Chimping
Bruce,
I forgot to mention that I see a distinct bluish cast to the photo. Do
you
see that on your system as well? It's understandable given the scene, but
I cannot help wonder if it's intentional or if you
And neither of you have access to one of those forensic DSLRs with
enhancement capabilities to match an electron microscope?
I think they use PS 99.
Or digital data bases that catalog everything - don't you just love it?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL
I use it for those times when one needs a 600mm lens..
Or when you need to exercise lug around 20 or so pounds.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Let Me Bore You a Second Time
- Original Message -
From: Markus
They all look quite good Bill. First is the best though. I think they
look much better than the one you posted yesterday. For example, look
at the upper right part of the moon, in these new pics, you can see the
small craters clearly, in the previous attempt, you cannot.
rg
[EMAIL
Yes, that occurred to me. You're probably correct.
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The difference in bokeh is, in my opinion, more due to the additional
focal length of the FA77 than anything else.
G
On Jan 4, 2007, at 6:38
On 1/4/07, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am advised that registration for this year's GFM NPW is now closed.
Let's hope it stays that way! (re: last year's slaughter. That means
you, Cotty. g)
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
Shoot more film!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
I am advised that registration for this year's GFM NPW is now closed.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Walt,
I have a Tamrac Velocity 5, which was recommended by several list
members. It only has room for one body if you're going to be carry
extra lenses. If you're carrying a second body you would have to
remove the body in the bag to get to your lenses. The plus side is
that in addition to the
Hi peter,
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007 00:53:21 +1030, Peter Loveday wrote:
Has anyone tried any of the 'sling' bags? Say the Lowepro Slingshot 200 AW
Yes, I have used the 200 AW for my *istD kit.
It has enough room for the body with medium size lens (15-45) attached,
plus 3 or 4 other lenses. On top
On 1/3/07, Collin R Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Software developer: Lotus Notes/Domino.
The horror! THE HORROR!
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
Shoot more film!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 1/4/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 4, 2007, at 5:49 AM, K.Takeshita wrote:
For those interested in this matter, some comparison images samples
between
two lenses.
This is a Chinese site and often heavy depending on time. Scroll
near mid
section to see
On Jan 4, 2007, at 6:47 AM, Christian wrote:
My brother worked at a computer shop for a while and they
had a saying: The only thing anyone knows for sure about
computers is
that computers suck. :-)
more specifically, every OS sucks:
That's the one.
I bought one and a 24-90 at the same time a few years
ago, and shot one roll of slides with each (remember
slides???). The 24-90 was clearly better in contrast,
sharpness, and light fall-off (not to mention the
extra 4mm at the wide end), so I returned the 28-70.
Rick
--- David
I have a modest size Beseler sling bag, tried a Domke and a Tamrac as
well. I've looked at the Lowerpro 200 AW.
For some uses they are convenient, but for most I find them rather
awkward to work with.
i have a Lowepro CompuTrekker AW, which is a great bag when i want to
carry a ton of gear
Propaghandi is great, I liked the video.
Thanks Christian.
Markus
:-)
more specifically, every OS sucks:
http://www.deadtroll.com/index2.html?/video/ossuckscable.html~content
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
more specifically, every OS sucks:
http://www.deadtroll.com/index2.html?/video/ossuckscable.html~content
it's funny but a tired joke at this point.
Yes, you're right... I promise never to send it again. :-)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
I was young when I ordered mine. Who thinks about expansion pack then?
There is always the hit and run option. In this case, this was my plan B.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Russell
This straps getting in the way is very much a matter of habit. If you are
used to have it around the neck you will automatically protect it from
branches and other stuff when needed.
I'm very used to have things hanging from my neck, it is my second nature
carrying my dog strap around my neck
Mark Roberts wrote:
...or perhaps it should be What's the skinny on camera gear and air
travel this week?
I'm flying (within the U.S.) next week and would like to know about
carrying on camera gear. Any new issues? As long as my camera and
lenses aren't made of more than 4 ounces of
On 1/5/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
more specifically, every OS sucks:
http://www.deadtroll.com/index2.html?/video/ossuckscable.html~content
it's funny but a tired joke at this point.
Yes, you're right... I promise never to send it again. :-)
It's
On 1/4/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 4, 2007, at 6:47 AM, Christian wrote:
My brother worked at a computer shop for a while and they
had a saying: The only thing anyone knows for sure about
computers is
that computers suck. :-)
more specifically, every OS
I agree. I recall that when I was shooting a lot of motorsports, everyone hung
their cameras around their neck. Most used more than one, and when loading
film, a neck strap was essential. A good strap places the camera within easy
reach and there is never any concern about the strap slipping
So I went out
this afternoon to get her a nice Southwestern photo. The building is
known locally (in Corrales, New Mexico) as the Perea Dance Hall, and
dates I believe from the 1930s:
http://aycu01.webshots.com/image/9400/2003747306340199283_rs.jpg
OH god, an ironic juxtaposition shot!
Charlton Heston Voice=ONWe're Doomed!Charlton Heston Voice=Off
Christian wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
...or perhaps it should be What's the skinny on camera gear and air
travel this week?
I'm flying (within the U.S.) next week and would like to know about
carrying on camera gear. Any
Again, this series was shot with the A600/5.6 with the 2XL converter
mounted. I attempted to process each file as close to identically as I
could, though I gave the ISO 1600 file less sharpening as it was showing
noise at that point.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/moon/moons.html
My Norman Rockwell thought is that if he were around today, this is a
typical scene that he might portray. With the new technologies, our
slice of life has changed.
Thanks for looking.
--
Bruce
Thursday, January 4, 2007, 5:27:08 AM, you wrote:
SB Hi Bruce,
SB I find this a somewhat odd
It might be time to re-calibrate the monitor. Thanks for the mention.
--
Bruce
Thursday, January 4, 2007, 6:10:32 AM, you wrote:
SB Bruce,
SB I forgot to mention that I see a distinct bluish cast to the photo. Do you
SB see that on your system as well? It's understandable given the scene,
Ditto.
J
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might be time to re-calibrate the monitor. Thanks for the
mention.
--
Bruce
Thursday, January 4, 2007, 6:10:32 AM, you wrote:
SB Bruce,
SB I forgot to mention that I see a distinct bluish cast to the
photo. Do you
SB see
On 1/5/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/4/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 4, 2007, at 6:47 AM, Christian wrote:
My brother worked at a computer shop for a while and they
had a saying: The only thing anyone knows for sure about
computers is
I am an architect (graduated 1978) doing city planning for a municipality.
Mostly I do development briefs (local plans). I took a bachelor degree in
project management five years ago.
I also do strategic planning and city renewal plans and renewal plan project
management (industrial areas
From my limited experience of shooting in snowy winter conditions, it
looks about right considering the light.
Dave
On 1/5/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might be time to re-calibrate the monitor. Thanks for the mention.
--
Bruce
Thursday, January 4, 2007, 6:10:32 AM, you
Thanks for all the responses. I got enough good input to go to the store
this AM and found a ProMaster Sling Bag. It will hold all my lenses, even
the 350mm T-Mount, and the second body if necessary.
I likes the combo of over the shoulder/backpack, with the waist belt it
stays in place and the
On 4/1/07, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
Let's hope it stays that way! (re: last year's slaughter. That means
you, Cotty. g)
I have 5 months to plot my revenge.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
I always considered them a necessary evil ... they always got in the
way. Nothing to do with style or habit. I hate having *anything*
hanging from my neck or even from my belt.
When I need a place to set the camera aside while changing lenses, I
either put it on a table or hang it from the
Scott Loveless wrote:
If you're not shooting any film, the DA70 is a better option
(smaller, less expensive, just as good). Otherwise, the 77. Maybe,
just maybe, this will result in a few more 77LTDs on the
used market.
I doubt that. The 77 Ltd is one of those cold, dead fingers lenses. :)
Snow with a blue sky above always images with a blue tint and throws
that blue tint onto everything else. I usually reduce the blue a
little bit: our eye tends to filter it out where the camera just
records it.
G
On Jan 4, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
It might be time to
1 - 100 of 274 matches
Mail list logo
