I gotta say, that's pretty freakin' cool.
On Feb 4, 2007, at 3:03 PM, Mike Hamilton wrote:
http://www.canon.com/camera-museum/tech/l_plant/f_index.html
That's pretty intensive!
--
--
Cheers,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MichaelHamilton.ca
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The lighting does indeed give it a 3-d effect except for one spot
upper center - that part almost seems out of place as I look at it -
almost like the lighting got block right there.
Certainly makes me hungry!
--
Bruce
Sunday, February 4, 2007, 10:39:29 AM, you wrote:
JD Since we're into the
I thought so too. It in really great condition and had the original
caps and case.
On 2/4/07, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$99 is a good deal for an F135/2.8. .Regards, Bob S.
On 2/4/07, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a chance to buy a SMC-F 135mm 2:8 off of eBay
Tim, I'm not Godfrey either but unless you're trying to put your audience to
sleep, you better cut the size of your slideshow down or go thru them
really, really fast.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Where Lightroom stores settings,
In a message dated 2/4/2007 11:52:20 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The tomato shot is easily my favorite. Two very neat patterns - the
diagonal baskets holding them and the colors of the tomatoes. Very
nicely seen and framed.
--
Bruce
==
Thanks, Bruce. :-)
Nice composition subject matter. Not sure about the contrast between the
trees sky.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 12:18 AM
Subject: PAW 2007 - 05 - GDG
Out for the Saturday Morning Walk today ...
I like it.
You sure captured the details.
I'd prefer a little colder depiction.
The real proof will be in the print.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO:Swiss National Museum park view
Hi Pentaxians
I really like this b/w sepia
Yes, you're right, I could have dodged that area a bit.
Thanks for idea!
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The lighting does indeed give it a 3-d effect except for one spot
upper center - that part almost seems out of place as I look at it -
almost like the lighting got block
Thanks, Bob. Makes me think of whipped cream. YUM
Jack
--- Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack,
That's a good looking strawberry!
Part of you vegetables you can photograph at home series?
Regards, Bob S.
On 2/4/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since we're into the
Good thought Bruce.
Any one like the photo though.
Dave
On 2/4/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're probably right. Silkypix, which supports the K10D PEF, is
showing the color temperatures right about where I expect them, so
other programs will probably also do that as they
Somebody should get themselves over to Vietnam with their cellphone
and film Nguyen.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Micah Kleit
Sent: 04 February 2007 20:35
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT: How to make a
Thanks Bob.
I have only shot 200 pictures so far, but its showing full.
Dave
On 2/4/07, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave, Yes...using the K10D. That's why I have 3 batteries.Bob S.
On 2/4/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this with the K10D Bob.
I was hoping
The radio station has played around with some logo ideas and the owner
asked me to try something with the gifs he was given. One is some text
another is an old steam whistle with whistle noise and a radio
becon.
http://www.whistleradio.com
The res of these gifs is pretty low, under 80k and i am
On Feb 4, 2007, at 11:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.gdgphoto.com/windowpeople/
Really cool, Godfrey. Especially like They Discuss, They Know, and
They
Smile. Interesting concept and great presentation.
Thanks Marnie!
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Shouldn't that be in the combat photography thread? ;-)
G
On Feb 4, 2007, at 11:35 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I'd have hit him first...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Bob W wrote:
Was shooting today at a local Scottish Games event. This guy
looklikes like
he was ready for beddy bye! :-)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/naptimeweb.jpg
Nice shot. Really like it. While the woman thrower (heaver,
uh, not sure
what to call her)
LIke the photo - looks black and white to me -- not sepia toned. Or
did you just mean should I sepia tone it?
You ask should it be more blue... sepia is a brownish tint - is this a
lost in translation thing? :)
I forgot the name for the blue toner stuff
ann
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi
No sweat in Photoshop:
- create new document that is larger than both GIF files
- copy and paste one, copy and paste the other
- fuss layers around until they're where you want them, etc
- when done, flatten and output to whatever file type you want.
G
On Feb 4, 2007, at 1:46 PM, David J Brooks
I like the first and the third - the church shot is pretty ordinary.
the angels are a rip - nice geometry, there -
and I love old train engines so I'm not sure how impartial I can be
looking at your craft :)
ann
P. J. Alling wrote:
I've come to the conclusion that the software that Mark
Well, although the DA50-200 goes to f/5.6 at maximum tele, it is IMO
the best zoom available as yet that covers this focal length range
for the digital SLR line, and it is tiny/light weight. The
DA*60-250/4 will likely be a better performer and has more range, but
it will not be anywhere
I use the histogram when I'm working in difficult lighting. With the
K10D you can see either a combined histogram or multi-view with
luminosity, R, G and B channel curves all separately displayed, so
whether white balance is correct or not you get to see what the
channels are doing and
Thanks Adelheid and thanks Paul for your comment.
I also like Alastair fishermen, Henk Terhell's 'Cormorants' composition and,
although not particularly fond on macros, Gianfranco's contribution.
Regards,
Jaume
- Mensaje original
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para:
only if you hit him with the camera.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 04 February 2007 22:03
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Waitangi Angels
Shouldn't that be in the combat photography
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re: Peso: salt pepper shakers
I must say that the DA70 is on my short list at this time. Your shot
is very nice and only tempts me further.
She doesn't come with it.
(I asked).
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
OK kiddies, I know this is an international list, but the Chicago
Bears will start playing the Indianapolis Colts within the hour. We
are all excited here in Chicago, even the Lions in front of the Art
Institute.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/ArtInstituteLions
It was cold and clear
David J Brooks wrote:
The radio station has played around with some logo ideas and the
owner asked me to try something with the gifs he was given. One
is some text another is an old steam whistle with whistle noise
and a radio becon.
http://www.whistleradio.com
The res of these gifs is pretty
Well, although the DA50-200 goes to f/5.6 at maximum tele, it is IMO
the best zoom available as yet that covers this focal length range
for the digital SLR line, and it is tiny/light weight. The DA*60-
250/4 will likely be a better performer and has more range, but it
will not be
On Feb 4, 2007, at 3:07 PM, John Whittingham wrote:
Well, although the DA50-200 goes to f/5.6 at maximum tele, it is IMO
the best zoom available as yet that covers this focal length range
for the digital SLR line, and it is tiny/light weight. The DA*60-
250/4 will likely be a better
Thanks Mark.
I'll give it a whirl.
One question. I see sometime Gifs that have some action to them. I was
toying with making the transmission part of the whistle seen in the
logo at the link on my first post, come and go.
Is this something done in Image ready.
I have never used IR
Dave
On
Thanks.
The files they sent are under 80K. I tried to upres them using the 10%
method, but all i got was worser jags.Good english , eh.:-)
I hope i can get something a bit higher in res. Its our logo and
selling point. Gotta have something nice right.
Dave
On 2/4/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi
I like this one Godfrey.
The slightly off angles work for me.
Dave
On 2/4/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Out for the Saturday Morning Walk today ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/05.htm
Comments, critique, and the usual catcalls for good measure all
I have 0 and 0 on my football squares. Of course that means no field
goals, so i'm out.:-)
Dave
On 2/4/07, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK kiddies, I know this is an international list, but the Chicago
Bears will start playing the Indianapolis Colts within the hour. We
are all
Phatt, only a Kilo.
I use my Nikon 70-200 Vr f2.8 for weight in my pick up during the
winter to help keep the tires on the road during snow storms.:-)
My neck is extremely bent out of shape after a full day of shooting
horses with that lens and what ever Nikon body i use.
Those are heavy
I really need to repurpose my darkroom and use the space for other
things.
Has anyone here had any luck selling enlargers recently? Are there
forums and/or groups where I'd have more luck? I've mentioned them
here in the past and got no interest. One of them is a fully
automated
Good hips.:-)
I like the contrast between the twig, cut down in its prime, and the gravel.
Its an interest angle and subject.
Good eye,er, hip
Dave
On 2/3/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Took the K10D out with the DA21 lens for a walk today. Had fun, as
always.
You must have used a reversing ring, i see pepper and salt.:-)
Nice and sharp, good detail.
Nice one
Dave
On 2/4/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The diner was busy yesterday, breakfast took longer than usual.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/shakers.html
Shot with
Is this Mrs Who??
http://www.web-options.com/London3/content/_2033343_large.html
I like the Hendrix shot
Dave
On 2/3/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
went for another stroll around London to see how the newly acquired
14-54 lens performs. I'm quite pleased with it - it seems to be
Thanks Bob/Bob/Dave/Paul for your comments.
I see opinion is split as to which style is preferred. I wonder
if this corresponds to a preference for bordered or borderless
prints? Style one was an attempt to reproduce the look of an
old photographic print with that 1/4 border.
Replies to
I am still a bit unclear on this. I just tried importing some DNG
files from my lightroom library on my laptop into my desktop library
by connecting the two machines over a network and importing directly
off the laptops drive. I had made adjustments on the laptop but these
do not show on the
David J Brooks wrote:
Thanks Mark.
I'll give it a whirl.
One question. I see sometime Gifs that have some action to them. I was
toying with making the transmission part of the whistle seen in the
logo at the link on my first post, come and go.
Is this something done in Image ready.
I have
In a message dated 2/4/2007 1:52:51 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Whats the best way to join two gif files into one. Is it realtivly
easy in PS or should i look into image ready etc.
Dave
==
PaintShop Pro (version 7, not sure about later versions) comes with
If you want to get anything for them, head over to APUG.org and try
selling them there, that's basicly your market.
Frankly, darkroom equipment is damned near worthless today, as so many
labs have been dumping theirs. Only something truly interesting will net
any $$. There's just too many
Remember that you're working with beta version software just at present.
Right now, Lightroom v4.1 beta is not appending information into the
DNG files properly. To move rendered files that have been completed
from one system to another, you have export to a photo binder and
then import
thanks Godfrey
that confirms what I thought. I don't think anything is written to the
DNG files in beta 4.1 since the date modified field doesn't change.
Lets see what v 1.0 does.
PS I see another forum that binders aren't in v 1.0. Presumably with
the new folders - binders become redundant. I
Cyanotype.
ann sanfedele wrote:
LIke the photo - looks black and white to me -- not sepia toned. Or
did you just mean should I sepia tone it?
You ask should it be more blue... sepia is a brownish tint - is this a
lost in translation thing? :)
I forgot the name for the blue toner stuff
Thanks for the consideration on behalf on the audience Ken ;-)
The keyword in the first sentence is _based_ on 1500 pictures. I've
already got 1100 in the bin, more will follow. Don't worry. It's a lot of
crap.
What I tried to say is that Lightroom is efficient for sorting files, and
thereby
I've been wondering how they implement the transfer in and out of
Lightroom for finished work with the 1.0 release ... The Photo Binder
notion is a good first shot at it, but a little clumsy. I hope they
encapsulate all the RAW settings and other edit instructions directly
into the DNGs,
I don't know that I'd call the color of this sepia but it's a nice
effect. Overall, I like the photo a lot ... but it needs to be
printed VERY large to be effective. It loses too much in this small
rendering.
Godfrey
On Feb 3, 2007, at 11:14 PM, Markus Maurer wrote:
I really like this
Forgot to say: I like the photo, but I think it's rendered a little
on the bright/too light side ... a little deeper would give it more
depth and prove richer to my eye.
Godfrey
On Feb 4, 2007, at 8:08 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5550821
--
PDML
I like it too; it's reminiscent of those trees in a Godard film whose
name I can't remember, and the final scene in Woody Allen's Love and
Death.
Micah
On Feb 4, 2007, at 6:56 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
I like this one Godfrey.
The slightly off angles work for me.
Dave
On 2/4/07,
Bob:
I like the last one very much, with the skyscraper in the
background. And sorry about the Bears; as a life long Eagles fan, I
feel your pain.
Micah
On Feb 4, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
OK kiddies, I know this is an international list, but the Chicago
Bears will start
John Francis wrote:
I'm trying to get my photography a little more organized.
As part of this effort I'm attempting to get out of the house
at least once a week, camera in hand.
Your photos all look good. The page designs seem a little heavy handed.
On 2/2/07, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Man, the lens pickens are SLIM... There's like three lenses total at KEH,
Ebay looks to have been picked over like last week's kill, and nothing at
all offered on the PDML...
Well, I just put my FA 300mm up on ebay tonight...
Nice shakers!
Funny, I had my DA21 out yesterday and today too. When I first got
this lens I was a little reluctant as I didn't think I would use it
much. That was an error... I get so many good photos when I take it
out for a walk.
Go for the DA70 too. You won't regret it. I showed it to
On Feb 4, 2007, at 8:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/VEGETABLES/
They're all good, Marnie, but I'm particular for the Carrots. :-)
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I have the FA135/2.8 ... They look the same optically according to
Boz' site, but the mount on the F looks rather different from the FA.
For $99 it seems quite a good deal, though.
I haven't used mine on the K10D yet, but it never seemed to focus
very slowly on the DS. I guess I should take
101 - 156 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
