This monitor/card I am using (Dell/Sony P991radeon) easily does
1600x1200 at 75 Hz progressive. And text
is crystal clear and there is no sharpness or flicker
problem at 75 Hz which makes it even the
slightest bit hard to read text. I must
admit that this monitor is WAY better
in terms of
Leftover from a pre-release firmware. Some of the test bodies had ISO 50
and 3200 available.
-Adm
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Pentaxians
In the german manual of the K10D is an ISO setting of 50 shown on page 155
under exposure warning.
Any comments on that?
Greetings
Markus
--
Hello Bruce - thanks for noticing and answering..
You have got a very good point about hte DOF, Bruce.
I guess, I was not comfident enough, that I could focus correctly enought to
go down to F.3.5-4.5.
I shot all shots at F. 5.6 - F8. Basically I used Tv and chose 1/1250 or
1/1000 sec's.
I used AF
Hi Russell
As others have commented, it seems dark but, in any case, there doesn't seem to
be any strong feature in the image that grabs attention.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Russell Kerstetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is
Well, they have yet to arrive, but I've made two enabling purchases
lately: a Domke F-803 bag for carrying around the city,
You must live in a very small city...
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Hamilton
Sent: 02
Hi Markus, and Bill
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 04:44:48 +0200, Markus Maurer wrote:
Glad you liked the first one. Photography ist a lot about emotions for me ,
the second one just seems not to touch you.
I looked back at the image when reading Bill's comment,
it may be the clipped window arches (at the
Hi Marnie,
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007 17:24:28 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While testing the new Manfrotto-393 and monopod with
the 300mm f/2.8 I witnessed another Grebe fish meal:
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=217
It was shot using this setup (on a monopod):
Hi Jco
This turns into one of the communications I don't want to participate in.
You must have the eyes of an eagle or a mole.
Just a last puzzle for you: What does T in an Eizo's monitor name stand for?
I'm back to Pentax topics and will not respond to that thread anymore.
Greetings
Markus
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/02 Mon AM 02:35:05 GMT
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PESO:The Whisky cellar
Hi Brendan
Thanks, I would love to take some photos at events for her and taste some
more of the finest stuff.
She works with
I see, thanks Adam.
Greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam
Maas
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 8:03 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K10D ISO50
Leftover from a pre-release firmware. Some of the test bodies had
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/01 Sun PM 11:12:47 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Yearning for Frank
Thats Frank all right.
Dave
I nearly didn't recognise him in his Holiday in SF mode.
On 4/1/07, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL
Hi Jan
That could well be but maybe a person sitting or standing somewhere would
have given a bit of life to that photo.
BTW, why does your email program add JunkEmail: to your response, that
does not sound very inviting ;-)
Greetings
Markus
PS: please don't delete the links in your messages
Hi Boris
I appreciate that you had a look despite your previous experiences.
Maybe if not overdone HDR can help with certain scenes, but I agree that
most photos I saw so far just looked unreal and more like paintings.
Greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/04/02 Mon AM 04:01:30 GMT
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO:HDR Federal
Hi Pentaxians
The light in the Zurich main rail station is extremly contrasty and it's
hard to get the big blue windows well exposed
My take...the 2nd photo should be vertical and taken from the ground
level (well not really maybe when you use the Tamron 17mm...). It
seems you were on the balcony or the choir loft at the back. Old
European cathedrals were designed to pull you up to the divine, that
is what I feel is missing.
Last Saturday, I decided that I would take my PZ20 out for a spin, for a
change. Unfortunately, we didn't get very far. After just 4 pictures,
the -20 decided it was time to rewind the film. This has happened once
before, and I believe I got exactly 4 shots last time, too. I've used
this body
Thanks, good news. I may have to sell my '55 if I don't land a job soon.
Paul
On Apr 2, 2007, at 12:06 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I think the one you are talking about went for $73K
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Paul
Good one. Well composed. Nice use of the light.
Paul
On Apr 2, 2007, at 12:14 AM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
I am not normally inclined toward street photography, but Tokyo's
Ginza
District sure got me interested. Fascinating place:
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/5659/display/8466041
Heading to Las Vegas Sunday and will be taking a very light bag. Just
the K10D, the 16-45 and 50-200 with maybe the A 28 and A50.
No flash.
I think its still ok to carry on a camera bag that fits under the seat
or in the over head, is it not.
In 2005, the US custom guy didi not care about my
I'm not sure I understand the controversy here. I see nothing
negative in Shel's post. It's just a funny picture. I'm sure Frank
will get a smile out of it, as did I.
Paul
On Apr 2, 2007, at 12:34 AM, David Savage wrote:
On 4/2/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/1/07, Shel Belinkoff
Possibly, as the film has been sitting for some time partially wound, the
effort to wind it exceeded some force limiter, making the camera think it had
come to the end. Try reloading, putting the cap on the lens and running it
right the way through.
From: Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On a somewhat happier note, it looks like I've just got myself two good
lenses for 350 Norwegian Kroner + a few hours of playing around with
screwdrivers, a drill, various solvents and some oil... That's an
M28/2.8 and a 135/3.5 - the original K version.
I've sort of been thinking I should get
Markus, with great reluctance :-) I should admit that this one is
among the very few very select shots that look totally natural to me.
Thus, you really succeeded applying HDR this time ;-).
Well done!
My sentiments exactly. Usually, HDR images I've seen look like
weird, pastel
Thanks for the replies. Godfrey and Thibouille, I'll go looking for a
case for the K10D. I've been thinking nothing was out there to fit
it. Thanks for the suggestions. My desire is to travel much like
Godfrey suggested, laptop w/power adaptor, K10D, 3-4 lenses flat bag
packed in a rolling
On 4/2/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, they have yet to arrive, but I've made two enabling purchases
lately: a Domke F-803 bag for carrying around the city,
You must live in a very small city...
Well, it's mostly the southside.
--
Cheers,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MichaelHamilton.ca
Dave,
No problem with the camera/lenses on the plane.
No problems with digital thru the x-ray screening.
Makes life a lot easier.
(Don't lose too much in Vegas.)
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/2/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heading to Las Vegas Sunday and will be taking a very light bag.
You *caught* the moment, Fernando! Excellent.
Boris
Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
I went to see my first hockey game last Sunday (I'm kind of lame,
three years in Canada and this is the first hockey game I go and I'm
not even talking about NHL, I know...). Shooting conditions were not
the best,
Ok sounds good.
What about cell phones. Can they be in the bag aswell or have to be checked.
I would not even bring mine, but the daughter and her boyfriend plan
on renting a car for one day and go for a drive to California, and i'm
a bit nervous about that, so i want my phone.
Dave
On 4/2/07,
if you are interested in the prices of '55's,
search the www.barrett-jackson.com website
as it lists the final prices of all cars
sold this year. the values of the cars are
highly dependent on the level of restoration,
whether they are numbers matching, and
of course, the drive train it has.
jco
Rick, I am not sure that your classification is complete and thus I
shall refrain from making my choice from the list below.
I bypassed it because it did not catch my eye. I mean - it is
technically good though I think it could use a wider angle of view to
show more context. But it is like an
What hubris ...
Putting the pics on the web ruins them.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: J. C. O'Connell
I guess I didnt make this clear enough, I dont
do lowest common denominator web photos, if your
screen cant show them fully as I want them to be seen,
then you simply dont GET to see
- Original Message -
From: John Celio
Subject: Re: Web Gallery
:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach...
JCO wrote:
I guess I didnt make this clear enough, I dont
do lowest common denominator web photos, if your
screen cant show them fully as I want them to be seen,
Phones are ok too. Just turn the phone off when you enter the plane
and turn it back on when you're back on the ground.
G
On Apr 2, 2007, at 6:35 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Ok sounds good.
What about cell phones. Can they be in the bag aswell or have to be
checked.
I would not even
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer
Subject: RE: PESO:Waterchurch - K10D + A24mm in low light
Hi William
Glad you liked the first one. Photography ist a lot about emotions for me
,
the second one just seems not to touch you.
I know that (missing) feeling with photos, there
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The light in the Zurich main rail station is extremely contrasty
and it's
hard to get the big blue windows well exposed and the hall not too
dark.
I used a raw file with a photo of the restaurant Federal and some
reflections in it's windows for a
Thanks
I'm a wreck when i fly anyway, just trying to bring the stress level
to 99 from 100
:-)
Dave
On 4/2/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Phones are ok too. Just turn the phone off when you enter the plane
and turn it back on when you're back on the ground.
G
On Apr 2,
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: RE: Web Gallery
:Barrett-JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach...
What hubris ...
Putting the pics on the web ruins them.
After reading your email and the one from John Celio, I decided I had to go
and see what moronity
I didnt bugger it up, these people want
me to optimize it for low spec PC
systems which I wont do for quality reasons.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 9:46 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I agree, thats why I didnt want to go any smaller
than 1200 pixels wide, it already is degraded
even at that resolution, going smaller makes
it worse, not even to mention having to convert
them to sRGB for PC usage.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, dont respond, but you are not going to get away
with the bad eyes comments and me not respond. I have
excellent vision and this monitor is truly exceptional
for a CRT of it's size.
This isnt my sole opinion. Everyone who has seen it
makes the same remarks, they cant believe how clear
the fine
From: Mike Hamilton
Well, they have yet to arrive, but I've made two enabling purchases
lately: a Domke F-803 bag for carrying around the city, and a Logan
301 Compact mat cutter. The bag is thanks to PDML, and the mat cutter
is thanks to the workshop that I attended on Saturday, learning how
On 2/4/07, Mike Hamilton, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, they have yet to arrive, but I've made two enabling purchases
lately: a Domke F-803 bag for carrying around the city, and a Logan
301 Compact mat cutter. The bag is thanks to PDML, and the mat cutter
is thanks to the workshop that I
My heart goes out to you ... I can only imagine that your torment and
anguish is akin to that of Van Gogh's.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: 4/2/2007 7:24:04 AM
Subject: RE: Web
In a message dated 4/1/2007 9:22:14 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Many thanks to those of you who took the time to comment. This shot
evoked some mixed feelings. I have taken Ken's suggestion and tried a
crop:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616a.htm
Original:
Hi Bong
That is indeed a very good observation and I'm quite sure your proposal
holds the key to success.
I was taking the photograph from the entry stairs and not from the ground
and I will need the 17mm Tamron to get the ceiling that way.
I will try again from the same distance but from the
In a message dated 4/1/2007 9:24:25 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks to all who have commented on this shot. There have been
several suggestions on crops that might improve the shot without
taking away from the original intent. Here is a crop based on those
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/womanonbench.html
istDS w/K85/1.8 @ f5.6
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi William
I found Bongs comment very useful and clever and I will try again with the
Tamron 17mm from the ground to see if the photo get's more divine.
The A24mm (36mm) is not wide enough there.
Greetings
Markus
-
In a message dated 4/1/2007 3:06:03 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to see it larger - there is a criss-cross effect to the
vineyard that is intriguing. Nice simple shot - not everything has to be
be high impact. I like how you avoided over-saturating it, but
Not bad photos at all, Markus.
Of course, by now someone has told you that commas slipped into your urls
(my). I easily found them, removed them, and was able to view your pages.
In the future, I suggest you do what I do. I set up my PESO pages, then view
them in a browser, and at that
Thanks Godfrey.
It's called Hauptbahnhof so you where really close ;-)
Greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 4:02 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO:HDR Federal
In a message dated 4/2/2007 7:43:05 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/womanonbench.html
istDS w/K85/1.8 @ f5.6
Shel
=
Nice one, Shel. It does make one wonder what is upsetting her.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
Hi Cory
Thanks.
If I or the programs default setting set brightness too high and try to
recover too much detail in Photomatix the photos look like you described
them.
So, less is more here and maybe I was kind of lucky with that scene too :-)
Greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From:
I need a mat cutter too...
Godfrey
I just bought a small hand held mat cutter a few weeks ago. Something like
15.00. Having only used the big pro models in a large photo lab in the
navy, I didn't have any idea it would work.
Pleased to say it works really good. The key to success is a good
Excellent. Nicely composed.
Paul
On Apr 2, 2007, at 10:01 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The light in the Zurich main rail station is extremely contrasty
and it's
hard to get the big blue windows well exposed and the hall not too
dark.
I used a raw file
My apologies to the list but I have no way to reach Jim King privately per
email, because I got the following email with 3 attempts:
---
These recipients of your message have been processed by the mail server:
Diese
Oh, I do care, but these are just web images, and everyone here understands
that the pics are just representative of a full size print. Why bother to
post anything to the web when it won't equal the quality of a good print.
I want people to easily view my work, and if they want to see larger
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach...
My heart goes out to you ... I can only imagine that your torment and
anguish is akin to that of Van Gogh's.
Perhaps in his angst he will pluck out his own eyes and out us out of his
misery.
In a message dated 4/2/2007 8:02:47 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just bought a small hand held mat cutter a few weeks ago. Something like
15.00. Having only used the big pro models in a large photo lab in the
navy, I didn't have any idea it would work.
Pleased to
OK, Mr. Photo Critic, I already stated these
were simple documentary photos and if
you had a freaking clue as to how these
events work, you would know that its
a miracle I even GOT any photos. There
were tons of people strolling the grounds,
which means I had to do grab shots whenever
the crowd
Thanks. Much appreciated.
Paul
On Apr 2, 2007, at 9:44 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
if you are interested in the prices of '55's,
search the www.barrett-jackson.com website
as it lists the final prices of all cars
sold this year. the values of the cars are
highly dependent on the level of
One other thing need mentioning. I have been
to many car events in my life but hadnt been
to one in about 5 or 6 years. What has changed,
is that about 2/3 or more of the cars now are
restored to BETTER THAN NEW condition. Its
unbelievable what they are doing now with
the body work and paint.
Nice photo. What's HDR?
Marnie aka Doe
==
Hi Pentaxians
The light in the Zurich main rail station is extremly contrasty and it's
hard to get the big blue windows well exposed and the hall not to dark.
I used a raw file with a photo of the restaurant Federal and some
In a message dated 4/1/2007 3:54:51 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frank has been mostly absent from the PDML for the past few months. I
understand that some people miss his presence.
I usually don't get into the spoofs about Frank, nor do I even enjoy the
ditto
On 4/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/2/2007 7:43:05 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/womanonbench.html
istDS w/K85/1.8 @ f5.6
Shel
=
Nice one, Shel. It does make one wonder
Both decent shots, Markus, but I like the soloist the best. If it was me, I
might return to the church and try for some closer ups of the pipes.
Interesting subject matter.
Later, Marnie aka Doe :-)
=
Hi Pentaxians
For the price of some sharpness I got these two photographs
If you see ANY photo at 1500 pixels wide which
is how I view them usually for full image, going smaller
like to 800 pixels wide really hurts the details a LOT.
Apparently you dont care or think it matters, but then why buy a 6/10Mp
camera and not care whether your photos are reduced in details way
huh? I dont follow. What I am saying is EVEN IN A WEB
photo, there is a huge difference in what you can
see/image quality between a 1200 wide image and a
a 800 wide image. (2.25 times the resolution) this has nothing to do
with
full rez. prints which of course are better than
either size web
In a message dated 4/1/2007 10:53:58 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Fascinating indeed. Joe, may I suggest that if the woman was in focus
you could have obtained different and in my eyes better picture.
Boris
==
What he said.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 4/1/2007 3:47:58 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My home town is going to build a new football stadium.
So, the planning department (that's where I work) wants photographs from the
old one - for a public meeting on the subject.
I haven't photographed a
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
JacksonCollectorCarAuctions2007WestPalmBeach...
Oh, I do care, but these are just web images, and everyone here
understands
that the pics are just representative of a full size print. Why bother to
post anything to the web when it won't
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
huh? I dont follow. What I am saying is EVEN IN A WEB
photo, there is a huge difference in what you can
see/image quality between a 1200 wide image and a
a 800 wide image. (2.25 times the resolution) this has nothing to do
with
full rez. prints which of course are
In a message dated 3/31/2007 12:52:51 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Several interesting submissions, but I think that Why Did the Salmon
Cross the Road?,
by Harald Rust is not only a great photograph, but also best fits the
theme of the month.
Dan M
=
Ditto.
In a message dated 3/31/2007 5:54:17 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The gallery seems to be suffering from lack of participation more and
more... I'm guilty, too, though
I had planned to do this one -- just too much stuff going on for me to
dig something up... and as
I'd love to see how you managed to get all that into that bag! Don't
get me wrong. I love my 803, but mine doesn't hold that much. ;D
On 4/2/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/4/07, Mike Hamilton, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, they have yet to arrive, but I've made two enabling
In a message dated 4/2/2007 8:59:53 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I liked this one. Is simple but with lots of curves and tiny patterns.
I would've liked to try less sky and more grass just out of
experimentation, although that would've been a different photo I
I liked this one. Is simple but with lots of curves and tiny patterns.
I would've liked to try less sky and more grass just out of
experimentation, although that would've been a different photo I
guess.
Nice.
Fernando
On 4/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated
On Apr 2, 2007, at 8:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just bought a small hand held mat cutter a few weeks ago.
Something like
15.00. Having only used the big pro models in a large photo lab
in the
navy, I didn't have any idea it would work.
Pleased to say it works really good.
Cotty tinkered with it in his shed and gave it a TARDIS upgrade.
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/2/07, Nick Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd love to see how you managed to get all that into that bag! Don't
get me wrong. I love my 803, but mine doesn't hold that much. ;D
On 4/2/07, Cotty [EMAIL
William Robb wrote:
the bottom line for publishing web images is to make them
easily viewable by as many people as possible. This means
sticking to a few accepted norms and procedures.
The most important one is to ensure that your image can be
viewed in full by the majority of viewers.
If an
Possibly, as the film has been sitting for some time partially wound, the
effort to wind it exceeded some force limiter, making the camera think it had
come to the end.
So, you think the film may have settled in such a way that winding it
was heavier than usual?
Try reloading, putting
I dont send them to be easy for very low spec
computers/displays and ruin them in the process.
THAT is a waste of time. you guys should be more
concerned with image qualiy but apparently you
are more concerned other things I dont give
a rats ass about...This was a quick and dirty
photoshop web
Samsung has 1.11 firmware out now.
If someone wants to play crossflashing firmware or try to find differences ...
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Yeah there are specialised tools.
It happened to me one time but buying the tool just for that was a bit
steep. My local dealer did for me in 2 seconds. Free. Happy me :)
2007/4/2, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Possibly, as the film has been sitting for some time partially wound, the
Thanks Boris, your 77 limited would have helped in this one ;-)
On 4/2/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You *caught* the moment, Fernando! Excellent.
Boris
Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
I went to see my first hockey game last Sunday (I'm kind of lame,
three years in Canada and
Personally I always use 1024x768 as my assumed baseline resolution for
preparing web images, even though my system runs at 1280x1024. If I
think a particular shot suffers because of this, then I add a link to
a higher resolution file.
And BTW John, 240 ppi for a web image is massive overkill,
http://www.climaxphoto.com/film/film_supplies/film_extractors.html
Just a small sample of what's available. Over the years I've used a few
styles and found the simple stainless steel to be the best for my needs and
skill level.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Toralf Lund
Good idea. Maybe
If you cant actually rebutt anything the post, I suggest you shut the
hell up!
These type of now your in the trash bin, but I cant say why replies
are absolutely USELESS
and unethical to boot.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott
Happened to me with my MZ-M years back. Same thing, it got shelved
for an extended period of time (I got an MZ-5n) and when I used it
again it began rewinding the film after about maybe 4 shots. I took
it to the local Pentax shot and they ended up replacing an actuator
motor of sorts...wasn't
I bought one for about $7.00, carried it in my camera bag for years. Saved
me a lot of $$, time, and grief ... seemed cheap enough. The ones I've
seen on the web recently were under $10.00. If you're shooting film,
sooner or later one of these things will come in handy, and be very useful
in
On 4/3/07, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Possibly, as the film has been sitting for some time partially wound, the
effort to wind it exceeded some force limiter, making the camera think it
had come to the end.
So, you think the film may have settled in such a way that winding it
On 4/3/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/3/07, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Possibly, as the film has been sitting for some time partially wound, the
effort to wind it exceeded some force limiter, making the camera think it
had come to the end.
So, you think
On 3/4/07, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty tinkered with it in his shed and gave it a TARDIS upgrade.
Close. Think 'wormholes' ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
On Apr 2, 2007, at 8:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... What's HDR?
High Dynamic Range ... a technique where layering several identical
exposures made at different EV settings can be used to increase the
effective dynamic range able to be captured.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Film to the rescue ;-).
You did just fine using so called old gear. Excellent photo. Be sure
to give it to your friend. I believe she may like it.
Boris
Bong Manayon wrote:
I was supposed to cover a friend's recital in and in a case of
overpreparedness I made sure to download the photos in
Ah, Non-Euclidean geometry. I always suspected Cotty had somehow
tapped into a different universe.
David Savage wrote:
Cotty tinkered with it in his shed and gave it a TARDIS upgrade.
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/2/07, Nick Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd love to see how you managed to
Markus,
HDR seems to work perfectly with this shot(s). It
doesn't look artificial at all to me. I wouldn't know
that you had combined your shots to get the skylight
if you hadn't said so.
-Brendan
--- Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pentaxians
The light in the Zurich main rail
I dont know where you are getting 240ppi number from but
on a typical 19 monitor even a 1200 pixel wide image
is only about 100ppi which is NOT overkill, I can easily
see the improvement over 800 or even 1024 pixels wide.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
On 2/4/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Ah, Non-Euclidean geometry. I always suspected Cotty had somehow
tapped into a different universe.
How fortunate then that I should meet you there Peter.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/31/2007 5:54:17 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The gallery seems to be suffering from lack of participation more and
more... I'm guilty, too, though
I had planned to do this one -- just too much stuff going on for me to
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
