>> http://tinyurl.com/2tat4n
> This is damn near the silliest thing I've ever seen. I hope you sell
> lots of them.
Sell? I had nothing to do with it, plus it's free to print and build on
your own. (I'm assuming anyway)
I don't plan on making one, but I hear paper models are big in places like
Yet another test with the Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm f2.8~4.0.
http://www.mindspring.com/~happydogsoftware/PESO%20--%20makeitpop.html
Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm f2.8~4.0 VMC Macro
Focusing Zoom
Note: So far the *ist-Ds has loved this lens. It handles well, hits the
expo
And there I thought you were going to put them in you on line store.
It's still silly.
John Celio wrote:
>>> http://tinyurl.com/2tat4n
>>>
>
>
>> This is damn near the silliest thing I've ever seen. I hope you sell
>> lots of them.
>>
>
> Sell? I had nothing to do with it, plus it
> "Classical" is often used in place of "Cliche".
Words and their connotations.
My photo is classical. Yours is stock. His is a cliché.
I am exploring my sexuality. You are promiscuous. She is a slut.
(Steven Pinker)
I am an adventurer. You are a traveller. He is a tourist.
I am firm. You are
That's a very nice collection, well presented.
--
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Tom C
> Sent: 07 October 2007 07:06
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: GESO - Trip to the Arboretum
>
> I took a trip to the Dallas Arboretum on S
Thanks for the link. This is the best opportunity to get me a black MX!
Maybe I put my grandkits at work.
Henk
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of John Celio
> Sent: 07 October, 2007 4:56 AM
> To: PDML@pdml.net
> Subject: Dirt-cheap MX
That is a most excellent linkm, John. I could open this and do a pattern
fill in Photoshop to have any skin I want.
And the M40 is in much better cosmetic condition than mine.
D
Henk Terhell wrote:
> Thanks for the link. This is the best opportunity to get me a black MX!
> Maybe I put my gra
Cute, though.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Quoting "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And there I thought you were going to put them in you on line
> store.
> It's still silly.
>
I like it very much. Lens testing can often produce some great shots :-)
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I really like the rendition of the Autumn Pink. My wife has some pink
flowering plants here and I can never get them to reproduce like that.
I wish there was an arboretum near me.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIB
Thanks Peter, that's a relief but also a puzzle.
The problem could be that I signed out at the end of my previous
session, but hadn't cleaned my web cache. Undeleted cookies might
tell google to require a signing in before I can proceed. Next time
I'll be sure to flush out my cache and then see
Beautiful. A nice collection.
Paul
On Oct 7, 2007, at 2:05 AM, Tom C wrote:
> I took a trip to the Dallas Arboretum on Saturday afternoon.
> Cooperative
> overcast skies.
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/presentation.tcl?presentation_id=358047
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cycling in England:
http://www.jimlangley.net/brake/lancsyorksrway.html
Cycling in France (Warning: pert bottom alert!):
http://www.campyonly.com/images/modbikes/2004/cl.jpg
Hmm.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
All good stuff, Tom.
If I were the proud photog of this image, I'd slide Autumn Pink a mite
left toward the center, but retain the same overall angle.
Jack
--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I took a trip to the Dallas Arboretum on Saturday afternoon.
> Cooperative
> overcast skies.
>
> ht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In a message dated 10/2/2007 4:55:20 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>It seems like the 28 mm still has the same depth of field given any
>given aperature when it is on the KX or the digital camera
>
>===
>It has nothing to do w
Mark Cassino wrote:
>>Hey, Mark
>>
>>Adam called it 1.6 in another post :)
>>
>>I'm using the old Pentax lenses on that dark side
>>camera you saw me with
>>at GFM
>>
>>
>
>Sorry - must of repressed the memory. :-)
>
Well I had covered up the words CANON on my camera with pieces of ye
I vote for France!
Evan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
WHY? Why Do you guys keep insisting on posting these links without any info? If
you were getting paid per hit I could understand. But why not just say here is
a
link to a cute paper cut out of a Pentax MX? Then the folks who are interested
can check it out and those who are not can save the ban
But, you should see what the English woman is wearing under the dress...
Bob W wrote:
> Cycling in England:
> http://www.jimlangley.net/brake/lancsyorksrway.html
>
> Cycling in France (Warning: pert bottom alert!):
> http://www.campyonly.com/images/modbikes/2004/cl.jpg
>
> Hmm.
>
>
>
--
Reme
No one's making you look at anything except yourself.
G
On Oct 7, 2007, at 7:33 AM, graywolf wrote:
> WHY? Why Do you guys keep insisting on posting these links without
> any info? If
> you were getting paid per hit I could understand. But why not just
> say here is a
> link to a cute paper
It would probably be amusing for the sadistic to watch the French woman
peddling in those high heel sandals.
P. J. Alling wrote:
> But, you should see what the English woman is wearing under the dress...
>
> Bob W wrote:
>
>> Cycling in England:
>> http://www.jimlangley.net/brake/lancsyorksrw
Different notions of what it means to be "formally introduced"? ]'-)
G
On Oct 7, 2007, at 5:30 AM, Bob W wrote:
>
> Cycling in England:
> http://www.jimlangley.net/brake/lancsyorksrway.html
>
> Cycling in France (Warning: pert bottom alert!):
> http://www.campyonly.com/images/modbikes/2004/cl.j
No sir, you are confusing the right to photograph it, and the right to make
money from it. They are two separate issues. Any income from ones property by
law belongs to the owner of the property unless he agrees differently. The only
issue involved is that it is clearly his property, if the phot
In a message dated 10/7/2007 12:35:41 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yet another test with the Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm f2.8~4.0.
http://www.mindspring.com/~happydogsoftware/PESO%20--%20makeitpop.html
Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/Vivitar Series 1 70-210mm f2.8~4.0 VMC Ma
> WHY? Why Do you guys keep insisting on posting these links without any
> info? If
> you were getting paid per hit I could understand. But why not just say
> here is a
> link to a cute paper cut out of a Pentax MX? Then the folks who are
> interested
> can check it out and those who are not can
Very nice.
G
On Oct 6, 2007, at 11:05 PM, Tom C wrote:
> I took a trip to the Dallas Arboretum on Saturday afternoon.
> Cooperative
> overcast skies.
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/presentation.tcl?presentation_id=358047
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/
The issue is not the right to take photographs, Peter. The issue is the right to
commercial gain from someone else's property. To legally sell photos of someone
property you need to obtain a Property Release, just as to sell photos of them
you need a Model Release (I use the same simple form for bo
Walt, could you please add "re:" to your responses to other people's posts?
I keep clicking yours thinking you're the original poster, but that's rarely
the case. Then I have to find the original post to see the link, since you
tend to remove it from your post.
It would just be a heck of a lot
In a message dated 10/7/2007 7:07:08 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One of the nicest things about putting the old lens on the new camera is
it feels and sounds like a film camera
that way -- because it becomes all manual. one of the unhappy things
is, about half the
- Original Message -
From: "John Celio"
Subject: Re: Dirt-cheap MX + 40mm
> Because it's a fun few seconds of amusement. At least, that's what I felt
> when I found it. I thought I'd pass it on, especially to people who might
> appreciate a little on-topic humor (or even a fun little
Do we know that? That is what the reporter said, but I would think the
attorneys
involved would know better. Just as some here seem to confuse copyright and
property rights, so do reporters, sigh! That is the problem with trying an
issue
via news reports, and why hearsay is not given much weig
> >
> > Sorry to offend (especially if you're on dial-up), but as
> my friends and I
> > used to say when we were kids, "Take a chill pill, bro."
>
> You to will find when you get old that you realize you don't
> have time to
> waste on frivolous things.
>
Chuck!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mai
Well those are rather different in time. But I remember there was an ad for a
French bicycle back in the 1890's that showed a nude lady hanging onto the
handlebars flapping in the wind like a banner, so your point is pretty accurate.
Bob W wrote:
> Cycling in England:
> http://www.jimlangley.ne
Hi,
The Pentax Roadmap lists a 60-250/4 lens as being in the works. Has anyone
heard when it is supposed to be released?
So far, my local rep, who apparently has no internet access, hasn't heard of
it.
Thanks
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailma
I'm rather curious about the object strapped to her handlebar. I
wonder what she's going to do with it later.
--
Bob
>
> But, you should see what the English woman is wearing under
> the dress...
>
> Bob W wrote:
> > Cycling in England:
> > http://www.jimlangley.net/brake/lancsyorksrway.htm
In a message dated 10/7/2007 8:58:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Sorry to offend (especially if you're on dial-up), but as my friends and I
> used to say when we were kids, "Take a chill pill, bro."
You to will find when you get old that you realize you don't have
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf"
Subject: Re: OT: Photographer Being Sued
> The issue is not the right to take photographs, Peter. The issue is the
> right to
> commercial gain from someone else's property. To legally sell photos of
> someone
> property you need to obtain a Prope
I find the facts of the case (at least as presented) make the suit without
merit. How was anything damaged so that "damages" could be claimed? If the
photographer had made $100/shot instead of the amount reported, there
probably would not be a suit. It's not about whether the photographer had
I believe the last release date I saw (someplace) was 12/07.
I'm, also, interested.
Jack
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> The Pentax Roadmap lists a 60-250/4 lens as being in the works. Has
> anyone
> heard when it is supposed to be released?
> So far, my local rep, who appare
At f3.1, (maximum aperture for this lens at 100mm) and 2.6ft, (minimum
focus distance), the DOF is about 6.8mm according to my DOF calculator.
I focused on the leading edge of the furthest right petal on the semi
circular group of petals in the lower right center. I should have
probably focused
In a message dated 10/7/2007 9:18:50 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At f3.1, (maximum aperture for this lens at 100mm) and 2.6ft, (minimum
focus distance), the DOF is about 6.8mm according to my DOF calculator.
I focused on the leading edge of the furthest right petal
That isn't quite true, there is an exception for Fair use and in most
cases art prints fall under fair use. We are getting further and further
from the case in question, but in that case copyright law is being
twisted out of recognition. You don't own a copyright ion your truck or
image. That's
Rights are a very very gray area. I think what graywolf wrote is overstated
as written. All property is owned by someone, therefore I would need a
release for any photo that was not of/on my personal property, if I wanted
to sell it? Bull puckey.
What if I was on my property but photons bounc
Look at the photograph. I don't believe the report entirely, but I did
look at every report I could find, (all pretty much identical). The
attorneys involved do know better, what they are engaged in is called
gaming the system, the law is whatever you can get a judge to agree to.
There's also t
On 07/10/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>You to will find when you get old that you realize you don't have time to
>waste on frivolous things.
That confirms it then - I'M GETTING YOUNGER :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|htt
>So far, my local rep, who apparently has no internet access, hasn't heard
>of it.
>
>Thanks
>
>William Robb
LOL. What?
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Let's see, when I last studied this over three decades ago, the logic
followed this path:
If you commit an illegal activity (trespass),
then any other action that you perform (photographing) while commiting that
illegal activity
is an action from which you are not allowed to profit (sales of s
The owner's request to hold the property sovereign is only binding on
its current custodians to press trespass charges which exist under
current law.
Jack
--- Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I find the facts of the case (at least as presented) make the suit
> without
> merit. How was anythi
Whups, sorry, that was supposed to be off-list.
:(
John
--
http://www.neovenator.com
http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto
- Original Message -
From: "John Celio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2007 8:30 AM
Subject: Re: GESO - Trip to th
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf"
Subject: Re: Very OT: Truth in advertising?
> Well those are rather different in time. But I remember there was an ad
> for a
> French bicycle back in the 1890's that showed a nude lady hanging onto the
> handlebars flapping in the wind like a bann
Time to time I experience the problem that it takes extremely long
time to render the image in Lightroom, i.e. I see the typical "JPEG-ish"
squares, both in the fit-on-screen size and when zoomed-in.
Then, if I adjust some parameters (e.g. sharpening), the picture
appears normally, but then, if I
I am giving Lightroom a second chance (it lost my whole library once, not
sure why. And, yes, it was only when I was just beginning to use it. But
setting up the library takes time.)
What I want is the library to MIRROR what I have on hard disk. And I want to
be able to use the Lightroom li
Sounds like a low memory situation. Try increesing your swap file size
and Lightroom, (I think Lightroom uses a separate scratch file), scratch
file size.
Igor Roshchin wrote:
> Time to time I experience the problem that it takes extremely long
> time to render the image in Lightroom, i.e. I see
No, I'm not.
If your property is on public property(Such as the street), it's fair
game for me to make money off of, identifiable or not, this is due to
the common law rights to public space. If it's on private property, you
are absolutely correct.
The common law in this case applies to the tr
I believe the last release date I saw (someplace) was 12/07.
I'm, also, interested.
Jack
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> The Pentax Roadmap lists a 60-250/4 lens as being in the works. Has
> anyone
> heard when it is supposed to be released?
> So far, my local rep, who ap
As luck would have it right now on e-bay, (1903 vintage actually)
http://tinyurl.com/33jeh9
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "graywolf"
> Subject: Re: Very OT: Truth in advertising?
>
>
>
>> Well those are rather different in time. But I remember there was an ad
>>
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Tainter"
Subject: Re: 60-250mm lens
> There are other QC problems. My first copy of the DA* 50-135 arrived
> with a loose lens element, rattling around inside like a marble. To
> their credit, Pentax USA replaced it for me after I posted a complaint
>
Evan Hanson wrote:
> I vote for France!
>
> Evan
>
Oh, I don't know. English cycling is rather appealing at times.
http://www.brookssaddles.com/ads/ad_2006.jpg (NSFW in the Puritanical
States of America)
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Something that every parent dreads - between the sticky fingers and
face and the inevitable bouncing off the wall from the sugar rush - it
is no wonder we always hesitate when the kids ask for it.
Pentax PZ-1p, FA 50/1.4, Handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/0132-11a.htm
--
Best regards,
Br
Detail of a building that is part of one of the wineries in Napa
Valley.
Pentax PZ-1p, FA* 200/2.8, Handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/0166-30.htm
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
I may have posted this long ago but I couldn't find anything online,
so for some this may be a first time - others may recall it.
Pentax MZ-S, F 17-28/3.5-4.5 Fisheye, Handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/0191-25.htm
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.ne
Bruce, I like this very much, I was looking at your page and saw this before
you sent the email to the group. I was taking some photos at a car show
yesterday with my 8 mm fisheye...Joe
http://www.photo.net/photos/pjjdxn
-- Original message --
From: Bruce Day
I like this one. It looks like fun, but I just keep wanting to ask, "Why
the long face?"
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> I may have posted this long ago but I couldn't find anything online,
> so for some this may be a first time - others may recall it.
>
>
> Pentax MZ-S, F 17-28/3.5-4.5 Fisheye, Handheld
>
Sweet stuff like that will rot your teeth, (so will cotton candy)
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Something that every parent dreads - between the sticky fingers and
> face and the inevitable bouncing off the wall from the sugar rush - it
> is no wonder we always hesitate when the kids ask for it.
>
>
> Pen
Lightroom has no scratch file or memory controls.
I usually start Lightroom and let it do whatever it does for a few
minutes before using it (like just now ... I browse email while it
does all of its maintenance and such, before I get to work in it). I
don't see this stop and start behavior
On Oct 6, 2007, at 10:51 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
> The Don gave me the two above mentioned lenses to test drive over the
> weekend. I'm presuming these are USM lenses. Right now, they seem
> to be
> using the body motor for focusing. Do I need to upgrade the
> firmware to
> utilize the lens'
Not especially my type of shot, but, although slightly hot, the detail
is fairly nice.
The very soft leaves at top and the left edge being a bit involved with
the window, detract considerably.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Detail of a building that is part of one of the winer
The article does NOT state that they are suing him for copyright
infringement. The defense counsel made reference to copyright infringement,
but that's just him talking - so far. You might be right, but your
assumption is currently unwarrented.
Regards,
Bob...
--
Initial schedule said availability in december 07. When it actually
surfaces ... possibly then or later.
Godfrey
On Oct 7, 2007, at 8:46 AM, William Robb wrote:
> The Pentax Roadmap lists a 60-250/4 lens as being in the works. Has
> anyone
> heard when it is supposed to be released?
> So far
This can be a fuzzy area. Apparently the photographer was on private
property and the photos were taken of that same private property; further,
it appears that the photographer did not have permission from the owner(s)
to even be there, let alone take photographs. Now, had he taken the photos
f
I do believe I saw the DA 60~250 12/07 release date on the 'roadmap'
some time back. As I now recall, and without dbl checking, I don't
believe the current 'roadmap' shows a date.
Jack
--- Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the last release date I saw (someplace) was 12/07.
> I
The downside about organizing my photos in Lightroom, is I'll be boring you
with some of my older and less inspired photos.
The upside is it lets me practice with PS (well, Elements 5). This one I
tried a B&W conversion with using a couple of adjustment layers, one using the
RGB channels.
Another one from Auburn. This one I played with Distort/Skew to straighten
out the light post a bit, to correct the distortion put in by a wide angle.
I found this mildly amusing. Old town Auburn is so tiny it seems to have
only two major types of business, antique stores and this...
http:/
There are about 20 articles some are more detailed than others, what
makes you think I got my information from only one source, (though most
simply regurgitate the AP wire story), I did a couple of web searches to
find them, No I don't remember my search terms.this is a mailing list
not a disse
Here you go, read the docket!
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-scdce/case_no-2:2007cv03264/case_id-153215/
Bob Blakely wrote:
> This can be a fuzzy area. Apparently the photographer was on private
> property and the photos were taken of that same private property; further,
> it appears th
Oh, it's two horses. Aha. Good one.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-
Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be censored.
** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
In a message dated 10/7/2007 12:19:49 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I may have posted this long ago but I couldn't find anything online,
so for some this may be a first time - others may recall it.
Pentax MZ-S, F 17-28/3.5-4.5 Fisheye, Handheld
http://www.daytonphoto
Hi all,
I've been absent from the list for quite a while. I've been
cleaning up the basement, and found a bag full of everyready cases.
I don't know what model these fit, though I think they'd fit the
SuperProgram or MX series. There are three with normal lens fronts.
One is emboss
So now we know where to get martinis...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Another one from Auburn. This one I played with Distort/Skew to straighten
> out the light post a bit, to correct the distortion put in by a wide angle.
>
> I found this mildly amusing. Old town Auburn is so tiny it seems to ha
Have seen the Auburn courthouse a number of times. Always give it a
couple looks, but haven't gone there with photos in mind.
I obviously don't know the lighting conditions, but on my screen it has
a low contrast, early evening, shady, appearance. If that's your
intent, you succeeded. :) (I would l
I was wondering what you were talking about, now that I understand I
guess you could get that effect with a horse that folds for easy storage...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Oh, it's two horses. Aha. Good one.
>
> Marnie aka Doe :-)
>
> -
> Warning: I a
You should send them to e-bay, with a BIN of about 20 bucks, someone
somewhere wants them.
William Kane wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been absent from the list for quite a while. I've been
> cleaning up the basement, and found a bag full of everyready cases.
> I don't know what model these
I think they're idiots by filing as a copyright matter, but what do I know.
Regards,
Bob...
“Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection.”
–Jean Luc Godard
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling" <
Frankly, the fact that you cited no other. I'm not going to go looking for
more myself. I just don't have the time. You make the allegations, you come
up with the references. Otherwise, yes, I do assume that only the references
previously cited that I can click to are the ones you've drawn your
In a message dated 10/7/2007 1:38:43 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have seen the Auburn courthouse a number of times. Always give it a
couple looks, but haven't gone there with photos in mind.
I obviously don't know the lighting conditions, but on my screen it has
a low
Let's see?
First it is almost always about money. Or if not money then what one perceives
as their honor.
Second, you can put almost any restriction in a land title and it is binding on
everyone who owns the land land thereafter. You can even put in a clause where
the title reverts if the clau
As if things were not tight enough The guy who just won the
darkside lens I had up for $85 (artphotodude) wrote
me that he didn't make a habit of not paying.. blah blah, and was VERy
sorry but he doesn't have the money
the job he expected to get for which he wanted the lens got pushed b
I will point out that I did say commercial gain, and with this I am through
with
this thread.
P. J. Alling wrote:
> That isn't quite true, there is an exception for Fair use and in most
> cases art prints fall under fair use. We are getting further and further
> from the case in question, but
Yep, that is the one I was thinking of.
P. J. Alling wrote:
> As luck would have it right now on e-bay, (1903 vintage actually)
>
> http://tinyurl.com/33jeh9
>
> William Robb wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "graywolf"
>> Subject: Re: Very OT: Truth in advertising?
>>
>>
>>
>>
That was my point all along.
Bob Blakely wrote:
> I think they're idiots by filing as a copyright matter, but what do I know.
>
> Regards,
> Bob...
>
> “Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection.”
> –Jean Lu
You should care you're a photographer. Besides I didn't post this god
damned thing, I only did a little research to know what the hell I was
talking about.
Bob Blakely wrote:
> Frankly, the fact that you cited no other. I'm not going to go looking for
> more myself. I just don't have the time.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton"
Subject: PESO - Detail
> Detail of a building that is part of one of the wineries in Napa
> Valley.
>
> Pentax PZ-1p, FA* 200/2.8, Handheld
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/0166-30.htm
This shot would work quite nicely if sufficient depth of
Indeed, I did not find any memory/swap file management in LR.
As for the computer memory, - this computer has 2GB physical memory
and I don't see the system hitting it while LR is working.
Somehow, it is indeed related to LR doing something of its own
in the first 2-5-10-15 minutes.. It is somewha
I can relate Ann. I just crossed 1 month of unemployment and I've
basically sold everything I can.
Evan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Yep, that's fun. Good fisheye application. Never saw it before.
Paul
On Oct 7, 2007, at 3:12 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> I may have posted this long ago but I couldn't find anything online,
> so for some this may be a first time - others may recall it.
>
>
> Pentax MZ-S, F 17-28/3.5-4.5 Fisheye, Han
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6505068
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Very nice lighting!
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6505068
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
>
Thanks Jack.
Paul
On Oct 7, 2007, at 6:49 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Very nice lighting!
>
> Jack
> --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6505068
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_
Ebay doesn't guarantee payment? PayPal only?
Jack
--- ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As if things were not tight enough The guy who just won the
> darkside lens I had up for $85 (artphotodude) wrote
> me that he didn't make a habit of not paying.. blah blah, and was
> VERy
> s
When you get old frivolity is all that's left.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/brianwalters
Quoting William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> You to will find
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
