On Oct 1, 2013, at 5:32 AM, Don Guthrie shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
Frankly that is closer to a lion than I would care to get. But the furry
rooster was kind of spooky also.
Thanks Don, and everyone else who had a look. For someone who likes cats it's
quite an experience but I was glad to
On Oct 1, 2013, at 4:16 PM, knarf knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
One of my favourite doorways in Toronto, 1313 Queen West is a former police
station:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2013/09/1313.html?m=1
Sure it's not the Munsters' house?
It is a nice doorway... what is the building
On Oct 1, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/5242fc7d69bedd5e276cd2d4-1200/a-wall-of-fog-between-the-boats-and-the-bridge.jpg
Bah, it's been Photoshopped: the wrong boat is in front.
;)
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML
On Oct 1, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Philip Northeast rnort...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
One of the early Australian challengers for the America's cup in 1970.
An all wooden boat she is now more at home as a cruising yacht.
One of her crew in the unsuccessful challenge was a John Bertrand later to
On Oct 1, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
https://dan-matyola.squarespace.com/danmatyolas-pesos/2013/10/1/mantis-portrait
Well done. Interesting colours, I don't think I've ever seen shades of red on
one.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Quoting David Mann dmann...@gmail.com:
On Oct 1, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Philip Northeast rnort...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
One of the early Australian challengers for the America's cup in 1970.
An all wooden boat she is now more at home as a cruising yacht.
One of her crew in the unsuccessful
Really enjoyable shot - I'd love to something like that in the wild. I've never
been to Scandinavia - must make more effort.
B
On 30 Sep 2013, at 20:34, SV Hovland pdml...@heime.org wrote:
Thanks, Mark and all the others who commented on the Finland pictures.
I read somewhere that there
Nice doorway. I would also like to see more pictures of that building.
--
Attila
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Startling, Dan. Nice macro work.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
https://dan-matyola.squarespace.com/danmatyolas-pesos/2013/10/1/mantis-portrait
smc FA 100mm F2.8 Macro
Comments are invited.
Dan Matyola
Headed to Westminster Cathedral last Saturday we happened on to a protest
against cuts to assistance to the disabled.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/eeweir/10016974314/in/set-72157636043938866/
--
Eric Weir
On 30/9/13, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
I should have
focused it a bit better, rather than just relying on hyperfocal distance.
The pictures is, I am afraid, not as sharp as it could be. It was quite
a challenge getting both the necklace and the text on the shirt in the frame.
On 30/9/13, John, discombobulated, unleashed:
Shouldn't need a signal booster for cable.
Aha yes, cable. I assumed that she was referring to an original image
pre-cable box.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
On 30/9/13, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
I got a new HD one .. and , jsut for good measure ... a nicely
inexpensive HD TV 24 as large as I could tolerate.. Now I have
the 24 in the main viewing area (my office) , the old sd set in the
kitchen attached to the cable box with RCA
Thanks, Attila.
Actually, I feel lucky to get those shots at all. Those little dudes are
tough to get a focus on at 15+ feet with a 50/1.7.
-- Walt
On 9/30/2013 3:39 PM, Attila Boros wrote:
The links from flickr are working. Looks like they are trying to scare
off each other. I know
Thank you, Dan!
It was a fun little exercise in focusing. I'm just glad I got something
to share out of it.
-- Walt
On 9/30/2013 8:03 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I must disagree, Walt; I think they are very good images, especially
the first one. Thanks for sharing them with us.
Dan
Thanks, Frank!
-- Walt
On 9/30/2013 10:10 PM, knarf wrote:
Cool!
cheers,
frank
Walt ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Recently, I've shared photos of both a mantis and a hummingbird. So, I
guess it's fitting that I should post these two shots of the inevitable
confrontation 'twixt the two. (No
That is an effective documentary image. The police are prominent
enough show individuality and intensity; the buildings in the
background set the scene dramatically, and the other photographers add
a sense of Something is going on here.
Dan Matyola
WHOA!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:43 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I first noticed this lady's stormtrooper and crossbones pendant, it wasn't
until we'd been chatting that I noticed what the T-shirt said.
I did take the
Thanks to all for the suggestions.
As I mentioned, I've completely decided on the ball head. I think the
Arca-Swiss p0 (zero) is a brilliant design and I wasn't even aware of
it until yesterday.
Using a full ring instead of a small knob to tighten/loosen the ball
is very glove-friendly (and even
Thanks, Frank, David and Bruce!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:39 AM, knarf knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Great shot!!
Cheers,
frank
Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
I like that - especially as I consider 13 a lucky number , not an
unlucky one
on my monitor this is a tad dark and low contrast.. however given
your tag line...
ann
On 9/30/2013 23:16, knarf wrote:
One of my favourite doorways in Toronto, 1313 Queen West is a former police
station:
terrific! much better than the other one
Maybe I'll post my vintage ones... main mascot Cormorants, secondary
mascots, Mantids?
ann
On 10/1/2013 00:59, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
https://dan-matyola.squarespace.com/danmatyolas-pesos/2013/10/1/mantis-portrait
smc FA 100mm F2.8 Macro
Comments
Thanks, Ann.
Where I live, we have more mantids than cormorants. G
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
terrific! much better than the other one
Maybe I'll post my vintage ones... main mascot
Looks legit. Lots of speculation over the bump and larger prism assembly.
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-news-rumors/238387-another-new-image-k-3-a.html
No rounded canon look, ala K-50/K-500. In fact I think it looks
downright sexy. Time to start dreaming..
--
PDML
Hi Walt - This was shot in the Henry Doorly zoo in Omaha. It's a
pretty interesting place. A person could spend several days there. gs
George Sinos
www.GeorgesPhotos.net
www.GeorgeSinos.com
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Walt ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
I like that a
While doing a little research on the M* 300mm I purchased from CollinB
I tripped across this amazingly abused A* 300mm (same optical
configuration). Don't look if you are squeamish about the condition of
your lens optics:
Yep, that's got to be for realsies. It also appears that whoever did
the bad photoshop job on the earlier K-3 image you shared HAD indeed
seen one, to make some of the modifications he made (which appear to
be accurate). We should only be a week to 10 days away from the
official announcement. I
Every once in a while you find a comment on PF that makes a LOT of sense:
If rumors are true that the k-3 body is to be shared with the future
FF body than this makes sense. A larger design volume for the mirror
and viewfinder assembly will allow for:
- a bigger viewfinder for the APS-C model
-
The bulge in front of the pentaprism is where the AF-points display is. See
previous models:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/news/pentax-k30-k-5-cross-section.html
Hence the K-3 can truly have a newer AF system, needing a larger AF-point
display module.
That's all. I can se no evidence of a larger
That element is bad, but not bad enough to destroy sharpness. I bet
there is certainly some loss in contrast on that lens. Also night
shots or anything with point light sources in the frame would be very
problematic IMO.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, fascinating to hear that the M*300 is so corrected. I expected 1
ED element, not 3.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
That element is bad, but not bad enough to destroy sharpness. I bet
there is certainly some loss in contrast on that lens. Also night
This was on Petapixel the other day, but in case you missed it - it is
pretty funny.
Every stock image has a flaw. We're here to point them out.
http://www.gettycritics.com/
--
Nothing is sure but death and Pentaxes.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I agree with you Dario. The AF mode button above the AF/MF switch
would seem to indicate a dial-switchable AF system.
I'm expecting something much more similar to the Nikon D7100:
http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d7100/features01.htm
though maybe not QUITE so many AF points.
I also think that
I think there is a new flash system if the rumor I read is correct.
You might be right about the points display, but the D7100 has like 5
million points and doesn't have a large pentaprism housing. Time will
tell for sure!
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, the M* was a ground-breaking lens for Pentax in many ways. It is
an astoundingly small and light lens for its aperture and focal
length. The only thing it doesn't yet have (1981-1984) is internal
focusing. The introduction of IF allowed Pentax to use a smaller
diameter front lens group (the
It would be way cool if it accepted the same battery and the same grip
as K-7, K-5, K-5ii(s)... Other than that - it is good to see that
flagship is being truly updated.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks legit. Lots of speculation over the bump and
The M and A * 300mm lenses look good enough for astrophotography IMO
based on that image. I love the size of the M actually. Very nice and
compact.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, the M* was a ground-breaking lens for Pentax in many ways. It is
an
It's an interesting design. I'd have to work with it a bit to see if it
actually worked as well as the description suggests. The compactness is
definitely a merit. However, for me, it MUST be fully compatible with standard
A-S type plates so I'd need to add a compatible clamp, which ruins the
http://detail.zol.com.cn/334/333580/param.shtml
If you use Chrome or otherwise translate that to english, it is
stating 24MP and 27 AF points.
It seems that Ricehigh has gotten one thing right (as seen in the comments).
http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2013/09/safox-xi.html#idc-container
Those of you
This video demonstrated just the p0 a little better:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wP24yVv6on0
Arca-Swiss also makes a p1.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
It's an interesting design. I'd have to work with it a bit to see if it
actually worked as well as
I use the 394 system at work.
Camera is attached firmly and there is space on the right side to remove
the battery for recharging.
Removing the camera is convenient.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
I'll put another guess out there that I haven't seen anyone make yet.
I'll bet the K-3 has a faster-than-1/8000th shutter speed and a
butt-kicking FPS continuous.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
http://detail.zol.com.cn/334/333580/param.shtml
If you use
I much rather Pentax really invented in alleged Prime III picture
engine. If they merged the capabilities of Ricoh GXR in terms of tone
and color to Pentax K-mount DSLRs - we may be up to a very pleasant
surprise.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll put
Invented should read inveSted
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
I much rather Pentax really invented in alleged Prime III picture
engine. If they merged the capabilities of Ricoh GXR in terms of tone
and color to Pentax K-mount DSLRs - we may be up to a
Boris, the chinese page I linked to states in the K-3 specification:
Image Processor : Prime III
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Invented should read inveSted
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
I much rather Pentax
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 10:54:20AM +0100, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 30/9/13, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
I should have
focused it a bit better, rather than just relying on hyperfocal distance.
The pictures is, I am afraid, not as sharp as it could be. It was quite
a challenge
The fisheye does 3-D. To quote the late Jack Paar Madam your net
doesn't quite cover your gross.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:43:21 -0700
From: Larry Colenl...@red4est.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Subject: Die Rebel scum
Now that's just too close to a mantis. I must insist on a bug warning
label on such photos or I shall change my email reading time to late
evening after all meals. No wait that might induce nightmares. Oh well I
guess if bugs bought portraits the mantis would like this one.. I would.
Boris has hit on the perhaps the biggest upgrade that makes possible
the K-3. What Pentax calls Prime III is actually 7th generation of
the Milbeaut processor, which Fujitsu just made *public* in Sept.
http://jp.fujitsu.com/group/fsl/en/release/20130904-1.html
Of course, Fujitsu partners have
The K-3 is going to be a *significant* upgrade from the K-5 family in many
respect[s].
And upgrade is the word. These specs mean that it will not replace the K5
series cameras. It will surpass them.
If Ricoh treats Pentax well, this level of upgrade could be a step toward
pro-grade units to
While doing a little research on the M* 300mm I purchased from CollinB
I tripped across this amazingly abused A* 300mm (same optical
configuration). Don't look if you are squeamish about the condition of your
lens optics:
http://forums.steves-digicams.com/attachments/pentax-lenses/147886d12647643
Evolution:
K-7 14.6MP Samsung sensor, PRIME II, 12-bit, Dynamic Range 10.6 EV
K-5 16.3MP Sony sensor, PRIME II, 14 bit, Dynamic Range 14.1 EV (HUGE leap)
K-3 24.3MP? Sony sensor, PRIME III, ???, ???
The 7th gen image processor claims The chip delivers greatly improved
optical correction
This might be useful to somebody here. How to support a roll of
seamless or a muslin background if you don't have a real system but do
have a couple of lightweight stands free. Yes, it's an IKEA hack too.
:-)
http://blog.brucemwalker.com/2013/10/diy-backdrop-support-for-under-10_1.html
--
-bmw
Would work well with my PVC + squeegee extention handles light stands
for the adjustable height poles:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/3698796828/in/pool-1156395@N25
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
This might be useful to somebody here. How
Looks sand blasted.
On 10/1/2013 9:26 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
While doing a little research on the M* 300mm I purchased from CollinB
I tripped across this amazingly abused A* 300mm (same optical
configuration). Don't look if you are squeamish about the condition of
your lens optics:
Thanks, that's interesting.
The ability to level the head for panorama work independent of the tripod looks
great. However, the thin ring control for ball tension seems a little fiddly.
It just looks kinda awkward in the video, but might work beautifully in use.
(One of the Acratech heads
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:54:40PM -0400, Bruce Walker wrote:
This might be useful to somebody here. How to support a roll of
seamless or a muslin background if you don't have a real system but do
have a couple of lightweight stands free. Yes, it's an IKEA hack too.
:-)
If Ricewhine gets this right, he'll be a great pundit with inside
information, while everyone forgets all of the other things he's gotten
wrong, and his all too apparent suppressed Canon love.
On 10/1/2013 10:34 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
http://detail.zol.com.cn/334/333580/param.shtml
If you
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks legit. Lots of speculation over the bump and larger prism assembly.
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-news-rumors/238387-another-new-image-k-3-a.html
Here's my take on three notable differences between this and
And if you use Larry's idea of the conduit hanger and you need to
drill out the hole a little bigger... do not hold it in your hand
while doing so, use a pliers.
DAMHIKT.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:54:40PM -0400, Bruce Walker
Yes it would. If you don't have 1/4 studs at the top, you could
simply tie-wrap the vertical part of the bracket to the PVC. That was
my original plan before I remembered the threaded bolt builtin to the
stand.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Would work
Sure, but you still need the horizontal rod. And without the rubber
strips that IKEA provides your rod will slide around dangerously while
you're hoisting the stands individually to their max height. And these
IKEA hangers are insanely cheap, and most important: they are _black_.
:-)
On Tue, Oct
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:42:12PM -0500, Darren Addy wrote:
And if you use Larry's idea of the conduit hanger and you need to
drill out the hole a little bigger... do not hold it in your hand
while doing so, use a pliers.
Bench vice.
DAMHIKT.
I sense the voice of experience.
On Tue,
Spinning ... metal ... sharp!
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 12:42:12PM -0500, Darren Addy wrote:
And if you use Larry's idea of the conduit hanger and you need to
drill out the hole a little bigger... do not hold it in your hand
And that right-angle bracket -- I'll bet many of us have a couple of old
flash brackets in a junk box just waiting to be used.
That's one less thing to purchase.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
On 1 Oct 2013, at 10:54, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 30/9/13, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
I should have
focused it a bit better, rather than just relying on hyperfocal distance.
The pictures is, I am afraid, not as sharp as it could be. It was quite
a
Marc Newson's token contribution?
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:34 PM, John Celio
neo.venator.com+p...@gmail.com wrote:
- Lump under the K-3 logo.
My first inclination is to assume this has something to do with the
mechanism that flips the mirror up and down, such as a stronger motor
to make it
On 1 Oct 2013, at 10:51, Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Headed to Westminster Cathedral last Saturday we happened on to a protest
against cuts to assistance to the disabled.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/eeweir/10016974314/in/set-72157636043938866/
Just had a quick glance at the
He's already posted it to his Facebook profile.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Don Guthrie shark50...@gmail.com wrote:
Now that's just too close to a mantis. I must insist on a bug warning label
on such photos or I shall change my email reading time to late evening after
all meals. No wait
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
On 1 Oct 2013, at 10:54, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 30/9/13, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
I should have
focused it a bit better, rather than just relying on hyperfocal distance.
The pictures is, I
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 01:48:24PM -0400, Bruce Walker wrote:
Sure, but you still need the horizontal rod. And without the rubber
strips that IKEA provides your rod will slide around dangerously while
you're hoisting the stands individually to their max height. And these
IKEA hangers are
I'd like to piggy-back on this thread with two questions:
1. Doug and Stan gave praises for Kirk plates.
So, what makes them different (and good)?
2. I like the idea of the universal (arca-swiss + RC2) clamp plate that
Larry has referenced:
https://peakdesignltd.com/plates/
I wonder if
I found this nice description page that has nice summary and many useful
links about arca-type-compatible products:
http://www.dentonimages.com/page.php?id=Arca-Swiss_Arca-Type_Systems_Explained
It might be helpful to other PDMLers.
I especially like the summary:
... once you start buying
- Lump under the K-3 logo.
My first inclination is to assume this has something to do with the
mechanism that flips the mirror up and down, such as a stronger motor
to make it move faster. I really don't know what it is, though. I
don't think I've ever seen anything like it on a camera
On 10/1/2013 2:05 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Marc Newson's token contribution?
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:34 PM, John Celio
neo.venator.com+p...@gmail.com wrote:
- Lump under the K-3 logo.
My first inclination is to assume this has something to do with the
mechanism that flips the mirror up and
Yeah, no, CollinB.
O-GPS1 will not work with the 24MP sensor and so that the lump is the
functionality of the O-GPS1 *built-in to the K-3
.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:32 PM, CollinB coll...@brendemuehl.net wrote:
- Lump under the K-3 logo.
My first inclination is to assume this has something
On 10/1/2013 2:32 PM, CollinB wrote:
- Lump under the K-3 logo.
My first inclination is to assume this has something to do with the
mechanism that flips the mirror up and down, such as a stronger motor
to make it move faster. I really don't know what it is, though. I
don't think I've ever seen
The mushroom version:
http://flic.kr/p/ginBVP
Q with 01 lens and popup flash
Toine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Somehow I thought this was going to be camera related...
On 10/1/2013 1:43 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I first noticed this lady's stormtrooper and crossbones pendant, it wasn't
until we'd been chatting that I noticed what the T-shirt said.
I did take the photo with my little stormtrooper K-x, and
A hump rumor
Originally posted by moray-eel-bite
Okay, so before the reality dampens the rampant speculation:
The hump is a wifi receiver and sending unit. This is needed, because
the LCD screen is removable and usable as a remote with full depth-of
field preview as well as focus peaking.
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 03:02:56PM -0400, Zos Xavius wrote:
A hump rumor
Originally posted by moray-eel-bite
Okay, so before the reality dampens the rampant speculation:
The hump is a wifi receiver and sending unit. This is needed, because
the LCD screen is removable and usable as a
Using it for astrophotography will moot the M*/A* 300mm f4.0's main
weakness, in my opinion, it's relatively long close focus distance. For
quite some time now I've been looking for an extension tube set with A
contacts. I figure that a 12-13mm extension ring would bring the
minimum focusing
Go early, and get the cheap breakfast to make up for it.
On 10/1/2013 2:17 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 01:48:24PM -0400, Bruce Walker wrote:
Sure, but you still need the horizontal rod. And without the rubber
strips that IKEA provides your rod will slide around dangerously
How perfectly silly, and requires that the rear screen have it's own
independent power supply. I just don't buy that part. It's much more
reasonable to suppose that if WiFi is involved that Ricoh would supply
an APP/application for a tablet device, (Phone, iPad/Pod, etc.), or
PC/MAC laptop or
Yeah. Not all that practical, but awesome sounding IMO.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:20 PM, P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
How perfectly silly, and requires that the rear screen have it's own
independent power supply. I just don't buy that part. It's much more
reasonable to suppose
If we go back to the original fuzzy picture posted by Zos (which now
appears to really be of the K-3 but with a different lens photoshopped
on the front) and you look at the right side of that hump, you will
see a thin line and what appears to be a larger slot at the bottom
(for opening with a
Possibly! The plot thickens LOL
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
If we go back to the original fuzzy picture posted by Zos (which now
appears to really be of the K-3 but with a different lens photoshopped
on the front) and you look at the right side
A hump rumor
Should have saved it for tomorrow when its..
HUMP DAY !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: New K-3 Image
A hump rumor
Originally posted by moray-eel-bite
Can we get over this hump ;)
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:43 PM, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
A hump rumor
Should have saved it for tomorrow when its..
HUMP DAY !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: Zos Xavius
Maybe Pentax marketing should be licensing The Black Eyed Peas song?
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Zos Xavius zosxav...@gmail.com wrote:
Can we get over this hump ;)
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:43 PM, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
A hump rumor
Should have saved it for tomorrow when
Funny comment on PF:
The hump is for the new and proprietary Pentax PDIS, the Pixie Dust
Injection System. The cover on the end allows it to be refilled.
If you think Limited lens prices are high, wait 'til you find out how
much a pixie dust refill is!
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Darren
Don't worry, soon there will be a thriving aftermarket in a unicorn fart
substitute.
On 10/1/2013 4:14 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Funny comment on PF:
The hump is for the new and proprietary Pentax PDIS, the Pixie Dust
Injection System. The cover on the end allows it to be refilled.
If you think
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 01:48:24PM -0400, Bruce Walker wrote:
Sure, but you still need the horizontal rod. And without the rubber
strips that IKEA provides your rod will slide around dangerously while
you're hoisting the
Yes! I should retitle my article to include the
so-cheap-it's-almost-free breakfast.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 3:22 PM, P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Go early, and get the cheap breakfast to make up for it.
On 10/1/2013 2:17 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at
Taken on a mountain trip. Someone decided to build a pension and
restaurant on the side of the mountain in the middle of nowhere. Looks
interesting, with a nice view, but somewhat out of place. It was still
under construction when I was passing by. The framing is a little
tight to keep out various
Larry: do you use 9-foot seamless roll on your background stand? I'm
curious how well the light stands work for that, which is presumably
the heaviest load the support would encounter.
I've been assuming it would work, but now I'm wondering ...
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Larry Colen
Very nice!
Godfrey
On Oct 1, 2013, at 11:53 AM, Toine to...@repiuk.nl wrote:
The mushroom version:
http://flic.kr/p/ginBVP
Q with 01 lens and popup flash
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Nicely done, Toine. DOF was able to get a fine sky.
Jack
From: Toine to...@repiuk.nl
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 11:53 AM
Subject: PESO Parasol
The mushroom version:
http://flic.kr/p/ginBVP
Q with 01 lens and popup flash
Toine
--
PDML
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 06:19:26PM -0400, Bruce Walker wrote:
Larry: do you use 9-foot seamless roll on your background stand? I'm
curious how well the light stands work for that, which is presumably
the heaviest load the support would encounter.
I've been assuming it would work, but now I'm
That is lovely and a nice use of the DOF available with that small sensor.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Nicely done, Toine. DOF was able to get a fine sky.
Jack
From: Toine to...@repiuk.nl
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday,
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
