On 2/4/16, Igor PDML-StR, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I am trying to understand preferences of different people.
>Here are three different shots of flowers:
>http://42graphy.org/misc/FlowersToChoose/
>I would appreciate if you can tell me which of these three work or do not
>work for you. And,
I think what Mark said reflects my view better than I could...
ann
On 4/3/2016 9:28 AM, Mark C wrote:
I agree that the composition does not come together in in a pleasing
manner, but its a fascinating photo in how you have capture the bird
frozen in time giving the viewer a chance to see how
Appreciate it, Mark! Thanks!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 2, 2016, at 8:40 PM, Mark Stringer wrote:
>
> super shot!
>
>> On 4/2/2016 6:39 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>>
>> Last visit of the season to any of the local wildlife refuges.
>> Perhaps better some action
On 2/4/16, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Thanks, John and Steve.
I should have said, of course, that I enjoyed the image (and not just
for mermaidian bazookas). Fun pic!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
Thanks you, Carlos!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 3, 2016, at 1:41 AM, Carlos R. wrote:
>
> escribió:
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Very nice action picture, Jack. And a beautiful bird.
El 03/04/2016 a las 1:39, Jack Davis escribió:
Last visit of the season to any of the local wildlife refuges.
Perhaps better some action rather than just sitting on a limb staring blankly
into space.(?)
Yeah, I too climbed trees a lot as
I agree that the composition does not come together in in a pleasing
manner, but its a fascinating photo in how you have capture the bird
frozen in time giving the viewer a chance to see how it launches, how
the feathers deploy and how the coloration helps conceal it. For me it
still commanded
Thank you, Stan, Darren and Cotty for the feedback.
It's always interesting to me to compare people's reaction/impression.
I find that the are images that are (almost) obviously and universally
liked (or disliked) by most.
And then there are images that are somewhere in between, and with
A rule I always follow, is never take pictures of black airplanes
descending, at military installations, while surrounded by armed men.
On 4/1/2016 3:22 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Way back when I was flying around in military jet, we had occasion to
make an emergency landing at a USAF base.
None really "works" for me. The third one (_IR31967) seems the best of
the lot.
The transition from in focus foreground to out of focus background
appears smoother. The other two kind of lurch from in focus to out of focus.
On 4/2/2016 9:27 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Hi All!
I am trying to
A special "Thanks", Mark!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 3, 2016, at 6:28 AM, Mark C wrote:
>
> I agree that the composition does not come together in in a pleasing manner,
> but its a fascinating photo in how you have capture the bird frozen in time
> giving the
> On 03 April 2016 at 11:00 Steve Cottrell wrote:
>
>
> .mermaidian bazookas...
This second amendment stuff is getting out of hand.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
That's because back in the Good old days, of say 20 years ago,
electronics was like that. Defects would cause failures within weeks,
sometimes seconds of powering up complex electronics, but the actual
products were so over designed and over built for the actual work load
expected, that
Har! :) You can be sure I wasted no time shooting several frames when
I saw Molly move gracefully into this pose.
Thanks Dan! And thank you Jack and Mark too.
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> Great image.
>
> It's nice to have a model who will
Igor,
All seem to be lacking in contrast.
I like 66 the best, because it's clear that the subject is the whole
foreground of flowers. In the first and third, there are too many
large flowers in the foreground, and my eyes wander looking for a
subject.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On
Indeed and she knows it :-)
ann
On 4/2/2016 8:04 PM, Nicole Jacque wrote:
Looks like she's queen of the meowntain up on her ladder!
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 2, 2016, at 3:08 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Ashley joins the celebration
Hi Igor -
In the situation you describe I would first see if the destination
media could be changed to better accommodate the out of gamut colors.
For example,and image with lots of out of gamut colors on matte paper
may be fine on a glossy paper.
If you still have out of gamut areas then
On 3 Apr 2016, at 17:52, mike wilson wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 03 April 2016 at 11:00 Steve Cottrell wrote:
>>
>>
>> .mermaidian bazookas...
>
> This second amendment stuff is getting out of hand.
Mermaids would look silly if they didn't have
It is a "standard" (though advanced) yoga pose. Molly is apparently
demonstrating excellent form here, though I was unaware of it before
Googling. :)
I have the name wrong too: this is the "upward facing bow" or "wheel"
pose, aka Urdhva Dhanurasana. Supposed to be very healthy to do,
though I
>From our local St Patrick's day Parade:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18212479=lg
K-5 IIs, DA 18-135
Comments are invited.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
>From today's walking the dog:
Some mud:
http://www.repiuk.nl/content/murky-water-2/
and some blurred cows:
http://www.repiuk.nl/content/bokeh-cows/
Q-S1 and 15-45 zoom
Toine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Thanks, Ann! I hadn't read Mark's
very well said astute comments that
likely elevated it's general appeal.
Thank you, Mark and Ann!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 3, 2016, at 7:28 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> I think what Mark said reflects my view better than I could...
>
>From yesterday's walk...
First exposure was made while I was fitting the lens and doubler, and then
spied a hawk land on the telephone pole visible through my home office window.
http://flic.kr/p/FMV8iS
So I carried that lens and doubler for my walk.
http://flic.kr/p/FTNfgG
I think you really missed an opportunity by not titling the second GESO
a slug-fest...
On 3/31/2016 3:32 AM, Nicole Jacque wrote:
I finally got through processing my photos from the hike Larry and I took at
Fall Creek. One of these days, we’ll actually get there more than a few
minutes
On 2016-04-02 14:41 , Bob W-PDML wrote:
An interesting article for the computer people on the list:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-35924858
got me interested enough to find a photo of Booth's original magnetic drum
None of them really work for me. They would make a nice background bit don't
really say anything.
A rule I aspire to is that photos, like sentences work best with both a subject
and a verb. I'm afraid that those photos have neither.
On April 2, 2016 6:27:36 PM PDT, Igor PDML-StR
Thanks, Rick.
Actually, that is the Aqua String Band from Philadelphia.
I've never seen a Mummers club that wasn't from Philly.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
> Nice colorful pic. Your
I haven't been active in a long time. Started a 9to5 a little over a
year ago, had computer issues for several months and slowly getting back
into photography. For some reason I was getting group messages but it
stopped on my BellSouth account and then it stopped on my yahoo account.
Out of
The PDML list can see your post, Jeffery. Welcome back.
Did you receive this response to your post?
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Jeffery Johnson
wrote:
> I haven't been active in a long time.
Cool! I thought mummers were more of a new year's thing. You photo
On 4/3/2016 2:39 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
From our local St Patrick's day Parade:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18212479=lg
K-5 IIs, DA 18-135
Comments are invited.
Dan Matyola
Welcome Jeffery. Enjoyed your gallery.
J
- Original Message -
From: "Jeffery Johnson"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 7:32:01 PM
Subject: Still Around
I haven't been active in a long time. Started a 9to5 a little
Glad to hear from you and that you have a steady job. Hang in there and go take
some spring flower shots!
stan
> On Apr 3, 2016, at 10:32 PM, Jeffery Johnson
> wrote:
>
> I haven't been active in a long time. Started a 9to5 a little over a year
> ago, had
More SEDATE??? than elsewhere? YIkes !
ann
On 4/3/2016 8:12 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Nice colorful pic. Your central Jersey mummers seem a more sedate group that
their Philly brethren.
Rick
On Apr 3, 2016, at 2:39 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
From our local St Patrick's day Parade:
I thought that some PDMLers might like this story...
.. or, maybe, strongly dislike it ..
Childish it might look, I smiled while rea.. err. viewing it:
http://www.zippla.net/funny-photos-of-dog/
Cheers,
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Nice photos.
On 4/3/2016 9:32 PM, Jeffery Johnson wrote:
I haven't been active in a long time. Started a 9to5 a little over a
year ago, had computer issues for several months and slowly getting back
into photography. For some reason I was getting group messages but it
stopped on my BellSouth
That got me to think:
In photography, RAW does not clash with "well done", and both can be
tasty at the same time.
Igor
Steve Cottrell Sun, 03 Apr 2016 14:04:05 -0700 wrote:
I
don't shoot RAW but I suppose one day I'll get there to have a play with
that.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
That's the nicest photo of mud I've seen in quite some time. The other is nice
too
On April 3, 2016 8:43:08 AM PDT, Toine wrote:
>>From today's walking the dog:
>
>Some mud:
>http://www.repiuk.nl/content/murky-water-2/
>
>and some blurred cows:
Nice colorful pic. Your central Jersey mummers seem a more sedate group that
their Philly brethren.
Rick
On Apr 3, 2016, at 2:39 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> From our local St Patrick's day Parade:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18212479=lg
> K-5 IIs, DA 18-135
> Comments are
Unfortunately, without an actual center of interest in the photo, a
birdbath, a fence post, a tree, a naked girl, limited depth of field
works against this type of photo. The fact thatm in all the photos, all
of the flowers, aren't in apparent focus, just doesn't work for me.
On 4/2/2016
On 3/31/2016 9:31 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I think Darren was being facetious. While the state legislation goes too far in
some ways it was enacted in response to bad law from Charlotte pols. All of the
politicians
I prefer the first. Something harmonious about it.
The 2nd is out: distractions in the frame.
The 3rd is okay, but loses to #1.
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
>
> Hi All!
>
> I am trying to understand preferences of different people.
> Here are three
Igor PDML-StR wrote:
What do you do when the destination colorspace does not have the color
you need?
Let's say you have a photo, you look at the "soft proof" in LR (or in
PS), and you see that the "center-piece" color is way out of the
destination gamut. For example, I have the photo of
easy peasy on that one, Bruce - lots of Pentax snaps in that category
ann
On 4/3/2016 3:58 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
None of us will now. Submissions closed.
Now it's time to start meditating on what we won't do for Golden Hour.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 3:44 PM, P.J. Alling
Me too! What Ann said.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 3, 2016, at 1:14 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> I'm in the "none of the above" category too-similarly to P.J., I cant find a
> point of focus - add my problematic eyesight it becomes somewhat vexing
> to look at.. which
That was my idea, a quite road with a model, walking down the road, with
a giant table fork over their shoulder.
You can fill in any details your imagination wishes to supply, I will
not be held responsible.
If anyone wishes to use that idea, be my guest, I won't be able to.
On 4/1/2016
None of us will now. Submissions closed.
Now it's time to start meditating on what we won't do for Golden Hour.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 3:44 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> That was my idea, a quite road with a model, walking down the road, with a
> giant table fork over
I'm in the "none of the above" category too-similarly to P.J., I cant
find a point of focus - add my problematic eyesight it becomes somewhat
vexing
to look at.. which iswhy I didn't say anything sooner.. fields of
flowers alone look so wonderfulin person but are too busy to work on
paper or
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, at 07:04 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 3/4/16, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Now it's time to start meditating on what we won't do for Golden Hour.
>
> Hmmm - seeing as I can use a Pentax lens again, I might just have a stab
> at that!
Noted.
If that
I hope the PEN works out for you, they're really sexy cameras, but it
looks like I was right, no longer quite so compact a package with the
adapter.
Still it's probably smaller than the K-5II w/smc A 24mm f2.8.
On 3/31/2016 5:43 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
First impressions of Olympus Pen F
Well, thanks. It let's you read the magazine online up to page 15.
Unfortunately the comparison starts on page 89...
On 3/31/2016 7:34 PM, Paul wrote:
FWIW Issue 118 of Professional Photo (a UK magazine, for those here in
the states) has a comparison/review of the Fuji X-E2S and the Pen-F.
My other new adaptor arrived, so I can mount the M39 Voigtlander 15/4.5
onto my new Pen F. This lens works really well and gives an angle of
view similar to a 30mm lens on full-frame, pretty much ideal as a
general purpose lens for me. Notably small, and the adaptor has a lot
less physical depth,
On 3/4/16, Bruce Walker, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Now it's time to start meditating on what we won't do for Golden Hour.
Hmmm - seeing as I can use a Pentax lens again, I might just have a stab
at that!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video
On 4/4/16, Brian Walters, discombobulated, unleashed:
>If that happens I might just refrain from further mentioning of the
>hat...
Oh the hat will get eaten, rest assured.
When the vapourware starts shipping ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video
On 3 Apr 2016, at 19:15, steve harley wrote:
>
>> On 2016-04-02 14:41 , Bob W-PDML wrote:
>> An interesting article for the computer people on the list:
>>
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-35924858
>
> got me interested enough to find a photo of Booth's original
OK Igor, you've opened up a real can of worms here...
The first thing you need to do is get a copy of Real World Color
Management:
http://www.peachpit.com/store/real-world-color-management-9780321267221
Now the first question is "is your monitor capable of displaying the
color in question?" Even
55 matches
Mail list logo