Short time-lapse video of 4th of July fireworks in Los Angeles, shot
from Mount Wilson.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rvp-M7olDA
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Getting a 404 error.
On 7/10/2017 3:13 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Shown in the dim past, but thought it worth a second look. (?)
C
Mamyia6
J
https://www.photo.net/photo/18407086
--
America wasn't founded so that we could all be better.
America was founded so we could all be anything we
P. J. Alling wrote:
It's a nice composition. It's the kind of thing you might see printed
big and hung in a boardroom.
Thanks
On 7/10/2017 2:42 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
A lot of the time when I post a photo, I know why I like it. This is
one that I don't have a good understanding of its
P. J. did you ever receive a the
Wild Oats image?
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 3:05 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
> Getting a 404 error.
>
>
>> On 7/10/2017 3:13 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>> Shown in the dim past, but thought it worth a second look.
nice , Dan
ann
On 7/9/2017 7:29 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Thanks, Alan. I really like the FA 100 macro.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Jul 9, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Alan C wrote:
Very nice, Dan. I prefer that to the purple one. Tack
I wouldnt' crop it 'tighter" - looks like you cropped it some, as the
k-r5 doen't yield square format ..
maybe a bit off the top -- nailed the focus opbviously :-)
ann
On 7/10/2017 4:06 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Thanks, Larry!
Appreciated comment, but I checked that possibility prior to
I did my usual detail check by
pulling it up a bit. I began to
lose the sharp edges fairly
quickly.
Wish it had been shot with the 150-450.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 4:05 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> I wouldnt' crop it 'tighter" - looks like you cropped
Damn - forgot to hit Reply List...hope this gets it back on track.
I think it was better with the water included. It needs the wider view
to emphasize the line of the rocks leading to the water and loses
something with just the rocks and sand.
-p
On 7/10/2017 6:42 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
That is a super shot! I love the posture you captured and the fine extent
of detail.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> At the local Gray Lodge Wildlife Area.
> Likely taken with a K-5/DA
Yes, I would assume they were
different as the successful post
was sent later.
Thanks for the, "not bad."
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 3:51 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
> I looked at the image that Marnie commented on. The two URLs are different.
>
ann sanfedele wrote:
Cliff swallow for sure, say I...
Thanks Ann, that certainly seems to be the consensus.
ann
On 7/10/2017 8:44 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Perhaps cliff swallows
https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Cliff_Swallow/id
or a similar species.
Dan Matyola
Thanks, Ann. I thought you might like these more subtle flowers better
than the showy pink coneflowers.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 7:07 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
> nice , Dan
>
> ann
>
>
> On 7/9/2017 7:29 PM, Daniel
It's a nice composition. It's the kind of thing you might see printed
big and hung in a boardroom.
On 7/10/2017 2:42 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
A lot of the time when I post a photo, I know why I like it. This is
one that I don't have a good understanding of its strengths and
weaknesses, which
I did also initially but sent it again
and got a compliment on it from
Marnie.
I, also, have received the good post.(?)
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 3:05 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
> Getting a 404 error.
>
>
>> On 7/10/2017 3:13 PM, Jack Davis
I looked at the image that Marnie commented on. The two URLs are
different. It's not bad.
On 7/10/2017 6:36 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
P. J. did you ever receive a the
Wild Oats image?
J
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 10, 2017, at 3:05 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Cliff swallow for sure, say I...
ann
On 7/10/2017 8:44 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Perhaps cliff swallows
https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Cliff_Swallow/id
or a similar species.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:11 AM, Larry Colen
Firmware up to date?
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 10:35 AM, Mark C wrote:
>
> I just noticed that my DFA 28-105 f3.5-5.6 does not show up in EXIF data.
> I've tried it on the K1 and the K3 and in both cases when I view file info in
> Photoshop the lens field in blank. I
In the Pentax system, the lens doesn't report a readable name to the
camera, but reports a couple of unique numbers that are recorded in the
EXIF. Your software then has to be updated to map those numbers to the
user-readable name of the lens. According to this page:
I saw some little brown birds with mud nests in a gazebo near the Oregon
coast:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/35700256991/in/album-7215768336043/
If anyone wants to have a go at IDing them more precisely than LBB, the
whole set is here:
Thanks, Paul and Rick. I 'll let it cool
off and sneak another try or two.
Wish I had a better plan. :(
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 8:41 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Photo.net has been working okay for me since I figured it out. Some things
> are still
Thanks Dan, also Paul, and others who looked or will look.
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
There is a sense of tranquility.
It resembles a zen garden to some extent.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Alan C wrote:
Next time you bump into Larry, do a clandestine swap!
That's why I engraved my initials into the front element.
Alan C
-Original Message- From: Mark C
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:35 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: EXIF Mystery
I just noticed that my DFA
Den 10.07.2017 00.04, skrev Steve Cottrell:
On 7/7/17, Jostein, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.alunfoto.no/bloggposter/2017/07/paeremokkmose/
Already told you how good this is ;-)
Glad you did! :-)
And glad I got back to the cabin exactly on time for the second moss'
sporehouses
Thanks, Larry!
Appreciated comment, but I checked that possibility prior to posting
and decided to leave that up to the viewer.
J
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:59:36 PM
Subject:
Shown in the dim past, but thought it worth a second look. (?)
C
Mamyia6
J
https://www.photo.net/photo/18407086
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
At the local Gray Lodge Wildlife Area.
Likely taken with a K-5/DA 55~300.
C?
J
https://www.photo.net/photo/18407009
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Jack Davis wrote:
At the local Gray Lodge Wildlife Area.
Likely taken with a K-5/DA 55~300.
C?
Great shot, I think its clear enough that it could be cropped a lot tighter.
J
https://www.photo.net/photo/18407009
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est)
A couple odd Photo.net happenings.
Unable to upload images for posting.
Careful review of details and multiple attempts without success.
Also, deleted a Portfolio image and just noticed it's back in the portfolio.
?
Anyone?
J
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Photo.net has been working okay for me since I figured it out. Some things are
still not quite right, but it is functional. I don’t want to switch. I have
6000 images on photo.net.
Paul
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 11:37 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
>
> Photo.net got badly broken wit
Hi Mark,
Here are my thoughts (but you might have already had all of them
yourself..)
Your photoshop could have a problem if it's RAW module version is older
than the lens. But since Flickr doesn't show that name either, I'd assume
it is not there.
(A slim chance if that PS strips it out ...
Photo.net got badly broken wit the "upgrade" a few months ago. Nothing
seems to be getting fixed. The webmaster, Glenn Palmer, vanished
mid-March. Forum messages and emails aren't being answered.
So, don't hold your breath. I switched to SmugMug. Good luck.
Rick
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 11:26
Rick Womer wrote:
Larry, that's beautiful. The curving line on rocks and the quiet beach
are very tranquil;, the pools with the blue reflections are very
intriguing.
My only suggestion would be to trim a bit off the top; the thin strip
of ocean is distracting.
Thank you very much. I
actually _ I like cone flowers in general - but not so much the crop you
did on the pink one with the bee
you are right though - I'm not into gaudy
ann
On 7/10/2017 8:15 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Thanks, Ann. I thought you might like these more subtle flowers better
than the showy pink
What he said.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
On 7/10/2017 6:40 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
It's a pleasant scene with interesting detail and an excellent composition.
Paul via phone
On Jul 10, 2017, at 8:45 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
There is a sense of tranquility.
It
I went to Muskegon Michigan today to see an exhibit of Edwin S Curtis's
North American Indian prints. It was an excellent and massive exhibit,
well worth a visit. I doubt that many PDMLer's are nearby, but in case
anyone is passing that way...
All 723 of Curtis' prints were on display - the
You're right - I pulled a shot into Pentax's Digital Camera Utility and
it correctly shows the lens name and other info. So I won't worry about it.
Eventually I might have to update my software...
Mark
Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:38 PM, Mark C wrote:
Makes a very nice abstract as posted.
The draw for me is the progression of the foreground rocks leading you into
the image, across the top and then exiting in the URH corner with the wet
sand pools adjacent to the foreground rocks nicely filling the frame.
Well done.
Kenneth Waller
Thanks, Igor. The contacts on the lens look fine. Since this problem
only happens with this lens and appears on multiple bodies, it clearly
is the lens that is at issue. Since flicker shows a lot of exif info I
compared what it shows for shots with my lens verses Larry's copy of the
same lens.
That is odd, John. Sorry if it was
a bit confusing.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 5:39 PM, John wrote:
>
> Oddly enough, the link in the first post worked just fine. It's the link
> in the second post that gives me the 404 error.
>
>> On 7/10/2017
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:38 PM, Mark C wrote:
> His data shows lens name and lens model, data which is missing from images
> I've taken.
Larry's version of Lightroom is new enough to understand the 28-105
lens code, and the version he exports to Flickr has the
Thanks, Jack.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
On 7/10/2017 2:25 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
"Tiny temple" certainly dominates
the scene, but I agree with your
choice to shoot the two together.
J
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 10, 2017, at 2:16 PM, Marnie (aka Doe) wrote:
Last PESO from
Maybe just try Adobe's free raw converter
On July 10, 2017 6:01:40 PM PDT, Matthew Hunt wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 8:38 PM, Mark C wrote:
>
>> His data shows lens name and lens model, data which is missing from
>images I've taken.
>
>Larry's version
Thanks. With the pink coneflower, I was zooming in to feature the bee, and
the framing cut off much of the flower itself, which was a secondary
element there to me.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:12 PM, ann sanfedele
Yep - checked all my cameras about a week ago. K1 is at v1.41.
Stanley Halpin wrote:
Firmware up to date?
On Jul 10, 2017, at 10:35 AM, Mark C wrote:
I just noticed that my DFA 28-105 f3.5-5.6 does not show up in EXIF data. I've
tried it on the K1 and the K3 and in
Oddly enough, the link in the first post worked just fine. It's the link
in the second post that gives me the 404 error.
On 7/10/2017 18:59, Jack Davis wrote:
Yes, I would assume they were
different as the successful post
was sent later.
Thanks for the, "not bad."
J
Sent from my iPhone
On
Generous remarks, Dan.
Thanks!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 5:11 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> That is a super shot! I love the posture you captured and the fine extent
> of detail.
>
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
Great shot.
Marnie aka Doe
On 7/10/2017 12:52 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
At the local Gray Lodge Wildlife Area.
Likely taken with a K-5/DA 55~300.
C?
J
https://www.photo.net/photo/18407009
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Nice one. Like the way the barn leans and the weeds sway.
Marnie aka Doe
On 7/10/2017 1:16 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Shot with a Mamiya6/50mm lens.
What a great camera!
J
https://www.photo.net/photo/18407129
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Last PESO from 2011 (not necessarily the last GESO).
Accompanies Pillars (shown the other day).
http://www.mapphotography.org/PAWS/pages/temple.htm
Comments welcome.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
"Tiny temple" certainly dominates
the scene, but I agree with your
choice to shoot the two together.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 2:16 PM, Marnie (aka Doe) wrote:
>
> Last PESO from 2011 (not necessarily the last GESO).
>
> Accompanies Pillars (shown
Shot with a Mamiya6/50mm lens.
What a great camera!
J
https://www.photo.net/photo/18407129
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Much appreciated Marnie!
I shot this with the camera on a
very low tripod to emphasize the
wild oats. Hence the leaning away
barn, I suppose.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 1:59 PM, Marnie (aka Doe) wrote:
>
> Nice one. Like the way the barn leans and the
Generous, Marnie!
Thanks!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Marnie (aka Doe) wrote:
>
> Great shot.
>
> Marnie aka Doe
>
>> On 7/10/2017 12:52 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> At the local Gray Lodge Wildlife Area.
>> Likely taken with a K-5/DA 55~300.
>>
Perhaps cliff swallows
https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Cliff_Swallow/id
or a similar species.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:11 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> I saw some little brown birds with mud nests in a gazebo near
There is a sense of tranquility.
It resembles a zen garden to some extent.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> A lot of the time when I post a photo, I know why I like it. This is one
> that I
A lot of the time when I post a photo, I know why I like it. This is
one that I don't have a good understanding of its strengths and
weaknesses, which is why I didn't post it earlier. However a friend
just commented positively about it on flickr, so I thought I'd give it a
try. I cropped a
On 4/7/17, Brian Walters, discombobulated, unleashed:
>A smaller gallery this month but lots to like.
>
>As usual you'll find the gallery here:
>
>http://pug.komkon.org/
Small but perfectly formed.
I particularly like Rick's and Dan's offerings.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__UK Shoot /
Larry, that's beautiful. The curving line on rocks and the quiet beach
are very tranquil;, the pools with the blue reflections are very
intriguing.
My only suggestion would be to trim a bit off the top; the thin strip
of ocean is distracting.
Cheers,
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Mon,
I just noticed that my DFA 28-105 f3.5-5.6 does not show up in EXIF
data. I've tried it on the K1 and the K3 and in both cases when I view
file info in Photoshop the lens field in blank. I noticed this because
uploads to flickr with this lens also do not show any lens data. I tried
a couple
It's a pleasant scene with interesting detail and an excellent composition.
Paul via phone
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 8:45 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> There is a sense of tranquility.
>
> It resembles a zen garden to some extent.
>
>
> Dan Matyola
>
Next time you bump into Larry, do a clandestine swap!
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Mark C
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:35 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: EXIF Mystery
I just noticed that my DFA 28-105 f3.5-5.6 does not show up in EXIF
data. I've tried it on the K1 and
61 matches
Mail list logo