Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18182370=lg
K-5 IIs, DA 18-135
Comments are appreciated
Very interesting shot. It looks like you were wrestling with some
challenging dynamic range there. Normally, putting him in the center
like that would be problematic,
Jack Davis wrote:
Beautifully exposed. Dan!
Believe I'd prefer it as a vertical accomplished
by cropping 'prox 1/3 from the left side.
I can see many potential crops for this photo, each one would be a
different and valid interpretation.
The three alternatives that leap to my mind start
I was testing an old Argoflex TLR yesterday and had to pull out a
partially exposed roll of film when it stopped advancing - figured I
shoot some cat photos with the part of the roll that was not ruined.
Here's one:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/black-cat
or on flickr:
Beautifully exposed. Dan!
Believe I'd prefer it as a vertical accomplished
by cropping 'prox 1/3 from the left side.
J
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 1:27:57 AM
Subject:
> In other words: Demand for used gear drives up the prices of used
> gear. Which in turn makes the purchase of new gear a relatively
> smaller step up, economically.
> If a particular new lens costs $1000 and the used equivalent costs
> $500 then buying used is an very attractive choice.
Kim Tang wrote:
>
>
>> In other words: Demand for used gear drives up the prices of used
>> gear. Which in turn makes the purchase of new gear a relatively
>> smaller step up, economically.
>
>> If a particular new lens costs $1000 and the used equivalent costs
>> $500 then
As part of finding my three to submit to the annual, I put together my
favorites from 2015. I had a lot going on last year, since I was
spending so much time preparing for my shodan exam in Aikido, that
didn't leave me as much time for photography, so most of what I
photographed was just
Larry,
I enjoyed all of them (and remembered seeing some).
Enough keepers for a year, I think.
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
In this case it was advertised as used LN- condition.
On 2/2/2016 4:13 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
IIRC, I've seen gear advertised as 'new' being sold @ KEH.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: "P.J. Alling"
Bulent Celasun wrote:
Larry,
I enjoyed all of them (and remembered seeing some).
Enough keepers for a year, I think.
many thanks
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpress.com/
Thanks, Bulent. I see what you mean about Flickr - looks OK on my phone
but very grainy on a larger screen. Flickr seems to apply some strong
sharpening to images - which doesn't always work well with extremely
grainy film exposures.
On 2/2/2016 4:08 PM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
Beautiful
Beautiful image.
A much better look at your site; Flickr somehow damages the image.
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
At my camera club meeting last night the main speaker gave a
presentation on wet-plate collodion process photography. He's doing both
tin-type & glass negatives. He said most people who try it only last
about 6 months and never touch it again. He's been doing it as a
professional portrait
On 2/2/2016 11:35 AM, Bill wrote:
On 2/2/2016 10:06 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Kind of make me happy to be in the backwater of Pentax. No need to
worry that the my newly pre purchased Nikon has suddenly been eclipsed
by the behemoth from Canon. I have noticed that both have opted for a
20mp
IIRC, I've seen gear advertised as 'new' being sold @ KEH.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "P.J. Alling"
Subject: Re: Converting bad SDM to screw drive AF
On 2/2/2016 12:40 PM, Mark Roberts
> On Feb 2, 2016, at 4:53 PM, John wrote:
>
> At my camera club meeting last night the main speaker gave a
> presentation on wet-plate collodion process photography. He's doing both
> tin-type & glass negatives. He said most people who try it only last
> about 6 months
On 2/2/2016 11:35 AM, Bill wrote:
On 2/2/2016 10:06 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Kind of make me happy to be in the backwater of Pentax. No need to
worry that the my newly pre purchased Nikon has suddenly been eclipsed
by the behemoth from Canon. I have noticed that both have opted for a
20mp
On 2/2/2016 12:10 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I need to get back into shooting and developing my own B film. Even
if I just scan the negatives and print digitally.
My department is considering adding a Photography Minor to our
program. As far as I can tell, having a B film photography course is
Very good shots in a wide range of subject matter, Larry. (Much wider
than my own year's product.)
My favourites would have to be the two performer portraits/closeups,
but the silhouetted birds and signs in the orange sky (sunrise?) is a
real eye-catcher.
Here's to a successful 2016!
On Tue,
On 2/2/2016 4:28 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
On 2/2/2016 11:35 AM, Bill wrote:
On 2/2/2016 10:06 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Kind of make me happy to be in the backwater of Pentax. No need to
worry that the my newly pre purchased Nikon has suddenly been eclipsed
by the behemoth from Canon. I have
Majestic creatures for sure - well captured.
On 1/30/2016 2:38 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18180085=lg
Comments are invited
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
Bruce Walker wrote:
Very good shots in a wide range of subject matter, Larry. (Much wider
than my own year's product.)
Thanks a bunch. Your 2015 catalog shows the benefits of working very
deeply in one genre.
My favourites would have to be the two performer portraits/closeups,
They
Our resort in Rarotonga made use of some convenient mounting posts for their
wi-fi access points.
http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/945/#peso
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
On 2016-02-02 16:34 , Mark C wrote:
I also think that there is a
perception that there is a lack of authenticity when digital processes are
used to mimic analog processes (a notion that I personally reject.)
i thought it was interesting that the Chris Earnshaw exhibit i linked to
recently was
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Just for Ann.
A Zebra Dove, the smaller of the two mourning doves that are found
everywhere in Hawaii and fill the air will their constant cooing:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18180393=lg
K-5 IIs, DA 18-135 zoom
Can you bring up the shadows a bit, and
I find myself agreeing with most things that Mark C says, and this
post is no exception. I also believe that there is something more to
wet prints than scanned (more about that in a moment) but that does
not mean that one way is Good and the other way is Bad. There are so
many avenues to
A neat image Daniel. The colors and texture are quite striking. I can
decide if the shadows going across the subject are detracting or make
the image that much more striking. Looks like Golden Hour light.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> A true
Now THAT's an image for our times.
:)
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 5:56 PM, David Mann wrote:
> Our resort in Rarotonga made use of some convenient mounting posts for their
> wi-fi access points.
>
> http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/945/#peso
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>
>
> --
> PDML
An interesting collection, Larry, but I must say I expected a car shot to be
included. You shoot such a wide variety of stuff whereas I tend to be rather
myopic. You've sort of inspired me to widen my horizons in 2016.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen
Sent: Tuesday,
That's lovely.
Cheers,
Dave
> On Feb 3, 2016, at 9:08 AM, Mark C wrote:
>
> I was testing an old Argoflex TLR yesterday and had to pull out a partially
> exposed roll of film when it stopped advancing - figured I shoot some cat
> photos with the part of the roll that
Thanks, Larry
I know I have to work on the image, but I'm on vacation, so I put it
together quickly. The shadow was of course what drew my eye, and it
needs to be brought out somewhat.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Larry Colen
Thanks, Larry and Jack.
I may indeed try cropping it to a square or portrait format when I get the time.
This is another angle on the same subject:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18180597
but it doesn't convey the way the rock juts out from the surrounding hillside.
Dan Matyola
Thanks for the tips, Collin.
I found one of these (with a bunch of scales) for $5 at a thrift store
(Just need to fashion a way to keep it around my neck):
Hi all,
Semi stand-in is the way to go.
I got some interesting results (also some craps with Lucky film), and at
least 2 cases, when top 1/4 part was with different contrast (perhaps
temperature difference).
Rodinal 1:100 works great. Just do one inversion after 10-15 minutes or
so, and
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18182370=lg
K-5 IIs, DA 18-135
Comments are appreciated
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
The camera is nice.
Get a good focusing loupe. You'll really come to appreciate it.
And a really good focusing cloth.
And a changing tent. A bag is ok, but a tent is wonderful.
And a good lens. The 135/235 is fine for b but that's it's limit. (I had
one.)
A modern NIkkor or Rodenstock makes a
Gasha wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Semi stand-in is the way to go.
>I got some interesting results (also some craps with Lucky film), and at
>least 2 cases, when top 1/4 part was with different contrast (perhaps
>temperature difference).
>
>Rodinal 1:100 works great. Just do one
>We all spend what we may spend on camera gear and that can be different for
each. I was hoping to say
>that buying used saves us money, but does that equal helping Pentax? What
if most of used Pentax gear is
>sold to fund switch to other brands? Then used purchases do not help Pentax
and money
Kind of make me happy to be in the backwater of Pentax. No need to
worry that the my newly pre purchased Nikon has suddenly been eclipsed
by the behemoth from Canon. I have noticed that both have opted for a
20mp sensor. I've also noticed that the Canon has been described as
feeling like a
On 2/2/2016 10:06 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Kind of make me happy to be in the backwater of Pentax. No need to
worry that the my newly pre purchased Nikon has suddenly been eclipsed
by the behemoth from Canon. I have noticed that both have opted for a
20mp sensor. I've also noticed that the
"Collin B" wrote:
>>We all spend what we may spend on camera gear and that can be different for
>each. I was hoping to say
>>that buying used saves us money, but does that equal helping Pentax? What
>if most of used Pentax gear is
>>sold to fund switch to other brands?
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I've got one that some friends bought for me to carry gear around the pits at
the racetrack, and then they painted it hot pink.
I guess we know what they think of you, Larry.
Team Fizzball's
On 2/2/2016 12:40 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
"Collin B" wrote:
We all spend what we may spend on camera gear and that can be different for
each. I was hoping to say
that buying used saves us money, but does that equal helping Pentax? What
if most of used Pentax gear
That's a lovely image. That 105mm f/2.4 is a thin DOF lens of creamy
wonder. I'm to lazy to do the technical comparison right now, but it
HAS to be the equivalent of an f/1.2 on 35mm. The difference is you
still get a good center of nice sharpness even wide open with the 6x7.
I dont' care for most
Beautiful setting and interesting subject which, unfortunately,
becomes an unnecessarily static image by its center placement. When a
subject is looking in a given direction, don't we long to see more of
what he's looking at (that side of the image) and less of what is
behind? Fortunately, this
I have used more film in the past year and a half than in the previous decade,
and process it all myself. But wet lab printing for me was never fun, it was
always just tedious work. I make far better prints by scanning and rendering
digitally, outputting to the Epson than I ever could in a
A very solid collection - I remember most of these but must have missed
some. The concrete ship (I think it is concrete), the snake and the red
head singer are my three favs, but every image there is enjoyable.
On 2/2/2016 3:29 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
As part of finding my three to submit to
> I just checked my junk folder on Gmail and poor Kim had three emails one
> of which was a reply to one of my threads. I hope he didn't think I was
> being a dick and was just ignoring him.
Dear PJ,
No I did not think you resembled a certain male body part or private detective.
Thank
48 matches
Mail list logo