I've had an Epson 3200 for a month or so now, and ever since, I haven't
use the lab to do a print. Scan straight off neg, tweak and print on the
inkjet.
It scans rollfilm beautifully. Only gripe I have, the holder for MF only
allows you to do one frame at a time (the 4x5 holder is on the same
JC,
Sorry for the late response, but I've only just been catching up on PDML
mails since Nov.
Love the 3200. No big issues with it, scans beautifully. Only minor
quibbles:
* Wish the 120 film holder could do strips instead of one frame at a time.
* The Epson photoshop driver could be better.
Hey,
I did find a quirk with the 3200 that I must share with you.
I tried scanning a 8x10 negative assuming I would be able to
get a 4x9 crop of it because that is the size of the overhead
lamp. I did not use any of the film holders, I just laid the
negative on the glass.
Result?
I thought the
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Nothing great here in terms of photos, but some fun pics from Grace's
third birthday. Note also the cake built around a Barbie doll. My
wife used to be the head pastry chef at a very good bakery. She still
knows how to do it. Enjoy.
I'm sure this has come up before, but I can't find it in the archives.
Have a lovely Voigtlander 40/2 ultron in M42 mount. Not the best lens on
a digital (quite a lot of CA, I've found), but a sharp little lens
otherwise, with beautiful build quality. Problem is I can only shoot
wide open
I've been enjoying browsing through the New York Times website now that
the pay area has come down. Here's an interesting column, going over
that well discussed area of the decline and fall of the music industry
http://tinyurl.com/2of6uh
P. J. Alling wrote:
I just finished reading Kenny Boy's page on film formats, and my God he
almost made sense. I mean there must be something wrong with me, I found
myself agreeing with him, at least most of the time. He's still cocky,
annoying, and more sure of his own opinions, (and
David Savage wrote:
On 9/25/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/09/07, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
That cow does not appear to be a cow.
That sentence gives me the horn.
What udder nonsense.
Cheers,
Dave
You wag, you (yes, it's Good Food
frank theriault wrote:
Comments always welcome. Thanks in advance.
http://tinyurl.com/2bagpu
http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/Rvj7z8A-_hI/AvU/tnTLMbsopos/s1600-h/sept_25.jpg
cheers,
frank
I don't know why, but Michelangelo Antonioni comes to mind when I see
this. Maybe
Peter Fairweather wrote:
This is as much a monetary as a photographic question. I have found
the Grand Prix model of the K10D complete with upgraded software and
winder for less than £600.
Opinions seem divided here on the value of the winder. I've even seen
it blamed for VPN, but that was
mike wilson wrote:
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/27 Thu PM 10:29:08 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Camera Leather
Cotty wrote:
On topic for a change!
Interesting site - have a look:
http://www.cameraleather.com/
Ugh. I
Derby Chang wrote:
Heartbreaking. When the monks first started protesting, this was going
to be inevitable.
http://tinyurl.com/2r8enn
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23414112-details/The+last+moments+of+photographer+gunned+down+by+Burmese+troops+as+nine+die/article.do
The AFP
Heartbreaking. When the monks first started protesting, this was going
to be inevitable.
http://tinyurl.com/2r8enn
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23414112-details/The+last+moments+of+photographer+gunned+down+by+Burmese+troops+as+nine+die/article.do
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Whittingham wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 17:13:11 -0400, ann sanfedele wrote
Rebekah wrote:
link! link...?
oops ooops
http://tinyurl.com/yst4le
:)
ann
Wonderful shot Ann, full of atmosphere, great composition.
John
I love the two chorus lines of
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You might hunt for a Pentax 16/3.5 ... I don't buy Sigma lenses and
the difference between a 17 and an 18 isn't worth the expense IMO. A
better lens might be worth it, however.
However, I suspect the Pentax DA14/2.8 or DA12-24/4 are better
performers on the DSLR
Scott Loveless wrote:
Evan Hanson wrote:
Well, I was rearranging the bookcase this morning when I found 5
rolls of exposed 120 in a bag behind Winton Churchill's Triumph and
Tragedy. Now I have no idea when this was shot, so i don't want to
invest a whole lot seeing what on these
Tom C wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6471532size=lg
Just rediscovered this. Taken in the spring.
Tom C.
Holy cow. Just rediscovered? You didn't see this one right out of the
camera? Beautiful.
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML
Bill Owens wrote:
When I could get it, I shot Agfa 200. Otherwise I shot Fuji Superia 200,
though I think Kodak Gold 200 is also excellent. I liked Agfa because it
seemed to render neutral colors more naturally.
Bill
Has anyone seen the resurrected Agfafilm in the flesh? Doesn't look
Christian wrote:
So I've got some nice panos I'd like to print such as:
http://photography2.skofteland.net:8080/displayimage.php?pos=-68
I'd like to print it about 8 x 60 My home printer does only 8.5x11
and I don't want to use multiple sheets.
Does anyone know of an online printing
I'd noticed this for a while, but hadn't got around to confirm it.
* Epson R1800 v6.50 driver
* Adobe CS3
When I print with borderless turned off, the sizing is perfect. When I
turn borderless on, it doesn't just print more of the image, but it
sizes it up. Most of the time, this is ok. The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took these pictures about 14 months ago.
Where I live, Contra Costa County, doesn't have much that is old and funky.
Expect for Port Costa, a tiny town beyond Martinez. At one time it was a
major port in the California SF Bay Area, now it no longer has a pier
Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On topic for a change!
Interesting site - have a look:
http://www.cameraleather.com/
Ugh. I really like their stuff. And so does Cesar, apparently. Since
getting the 645 I thought it would look
I think I like this guy. This line makes me smile:
Tri-X was the greatest industrial acheivement of the 20th century
He has a 645N kit and is a foodie.
http://www.thatsmymonkey.com/0222spotlight.html
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
As I stated in my previous post, I am back home. This should be for
quite a while.
After sending my last message I went out to my back porch - it is nice
and cool out.
This is my view:
Not much of a shot, but a good test subject. Came across a 2nd hand
Nikon Coolscan while looking for a Voigtlander lens hood of all things.
Scanner is a little flakey, but so much fun. To think of all the hours
and days I wasted scanning without ICE, I just have to weep.
David Savage wrote:
I was going to say the same thing as peter, but as noted some of the DA's
cover the full 35mm frame.
I think the best way to classify them is in regards to the variations in
the lens mount.
FA: KAF2 lens mount.
FAJ: KAF mount (crippled), minus aperture simulator
P. J. Alling wrote:
F FA FAJ Full frame 35mm
D FA Full frame (24x36mm) Digital (what ever that means special coatings
at the very least) with a f stop ring for film bodies.
DA Reduced frame digital
The definitions are fairly simple. Full frame will be guaranteed to
cover 24x36mm Reduced
I think we were asking the same when question when Canon and Nikon
digital SLRs were catching the headlines and Pentax were still in the
vapourware zone (and pushing out more variants of the MZ line). Then the
*istD series came along.
I, for one, am more than happy to have caught 10s of 1000s
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 4:03 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
Not much of a shot, but a good test subject. Came across a 2nd hand
Nikon Coolscan while looking for a Voigtlander lens hood of all
things.
Scanner is a little flakey, but so much fun. To think of all the hours
Few more scans of old Sydney Town. Coolscan IV ED again.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_10/07_10_mos/index.htm
I'll get off this retro kick soon and take some new shots.
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
frank theriault wrote:
Riding to work through Toronto's Wychwood Park area. As some of you
may already know, this is part of an ongoing series:
http://tinyurl.com/2bjvek
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RwOGZ8A-_sI/Aws/rMx-oGfcPXk/s1600-h/oct_3+002.jpg
Comments always welcome.
Semi-off-topic.
(this link skips the flash intro)
http://www.homebake.com.au/2007/index.html
My little friends just made it onto Homebake (local indie music
festival). Click on Bridezilla for their bio. So proud of them.
On-topic bit: The band shot taken with *istDS and FA*85
Oh boy,
PC power supply self destructed on Thursday night. Acrid smell in the
room took me right back to my engineering days working on inverters for
implantable defibrilllators. Just managed to resurrect the PC this evening.
So, a PESO.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
One of my older shots.
Pentax PZ-1p, F 17-28/3.4-4.5 Fisheye
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/0048-21.htm
Gorgeous colour. And an example of rules that are made to be broken.
Horizon line is just about through the centre. But the should wouldn't
work as well if it
David Savage wrote:
Warning: This is not a 100% smut free site (it's pretty tame smut
though :-), but the main images are quite interesting.
http://www.spynet.ru/2007/09/13/amerikansikie-soldaty-posle-vojjny-v.html
Anybody who starts a political slanging match is a Nazi (I hear by
declare
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/3/2007 1:56:02 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is really pretty good! I have never been able to capture fall
colors involving a larger number of trees - only small isolation
stuff. This is better than anything I
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 6, 2007, at 4:30 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_10/07_10_sundew/01.htm
I love simple compositions like this, Derby, but this one just
doesn't hold my eye. There's not quite enough to make it work, imo: I
have
That is a most excellent linkm, John. I could open this and do a pattern
fill in Photoshop to have any skin I want.
And the M40 is in much better cosmetic condition than mine.
D
Henk Terhell wrote:
Thanks for the link. This is the best opportunity to get me a black MX!
Maybe I put my
Scott Loveless wrote:
PUG's up. Sorry for the delay. http://pug.komkon.org/ November's
theme is opposites. You can submit photos at http://pdmlpug.org/?cat=4.
We have a large field this month. 35 damn fine photos. I guess you
guys really don't like John Denver much.
I fixed the
and guess which one is number 1.
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/top-ten-new-camera-recomm.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Hi all,
I've seldom contributed to the list for some time. That could be a possible
reason for the low interest raised by my pictures postered here, or perhaps
they are just pure crap. That's a possibility I take into serious account
(and I'm not kidding). So I've
Doug Franklin wrote:
How do I get better at doing my own gallery editing? I'm not talking
about the fine points of bending Photoshop to my will. I'm talking
about choosing the images that end up in the gallery for a collection
and the characteristics of the gallery itself.
Good
Cotty wrote:
Cotty, you have to admit, you stepped right into it...
I like to lay down a challenge...
Ok, lets really pile it on...
You just don't give a shit, do you?
This is really OT but Slate posted a cool article today.
David Mann wrote:
The X-ray sheet was too big for my scanner as it obscured the
calibration area. I wasn't willing to cut it up, so I put it on my
light box and set up the K10D on a tripod.
Enjoy :)
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/temp/xray.html
- Dave
On Oct 13, 2007, at 8:12 PM,
On 10/14/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a superb lens that I don't use often enough: the K 135/2.5.
Here's a K10D shot at f2.5/1.500th ISO 100.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6528958
Paul, I completely agree about this lens. I have neglected mine for
Man, I really hate Boz's site. It (and Stan's site
http://stans-photography.info/) has been the source (sinkhole) for so
much lost funds due to LBA. (Of course, by hate, I really mean love love
love).
Happy birthday, k-page. And thanks Stan.
D
David J Brooks wrote:
I used Boz's site
Adam Maas wrote:
And to William - I'd probably be a Republican if I was an American, it's
a more comfortable party to a small-l libertarian like me.
-Adam
Republican, libertarian? Really
(OK, I'm Australian, but I could raise the same eyebrow about the
Liberal Party of Australia, a
frank theriault wrote:
On 10/12/07, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.neovenator.com/2007/10/mr_11.html
Completely natural shot (lighting and everything) that I nearly stepped on
while hiking through a small redwood forest in Santa Cruz, CA. It's
sufficiently creepy to be
Bob Blakely wrote:
It's a hard roe for him to hoe.
Regards,
Bob...
Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection.
-Jean Luc Godard
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nice lens. Fast becoming my favourite macro.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_10/07_10_vivitarmacro/index.htm
And an OT PESO (it was taken with a Fuji F20)
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_10/07_10_fashionistas/01.htm
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
For those who like 360 degree panoramas, I took this last night after
work (~480kb Quicktime VR, not spherical):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/pano_02.mov
K10D, FA 31mm f1.8, f11 @ 0.4 seconds, ISO 100. 27 frames
The original .psb file is
. A
difficult shot with a great result. I wish my attempts were so
successful.
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/20/07, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice lens. Fast becoming my favourite macro.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_10/07_10_vivitarmacro/index.htm
And an OT PESO (it was taken
Every year, during Good Food Month, there is a public art festival here
in Sydney. One of the favourite events is the Sydney Life photo comp.
The promo always describes them as bedsheet size prints hung under the
wide avenue in Hyde Park. Only just managed to catch it yesterday, while
the
Me too, graywolf.
Adorama have generally been ok for me, except when I bought the P67
100mm macro, which I am sure the listing said w/ life converter. When
it arrived, no converter. They said they packed everything that came
with the lens. The listing of course wasn't on the site any more
/SL/
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/brianwalters
Quoting Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Every year, during Good Food Month, there is a public art festival
here
in Sydney. One of the favourite events is the Sydney Life photo
comp.
The promo always describes them as bedsheet size
://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_10/07_10_vivitarmacro/06.htm
I like the big OOF highlight in the background
And if you like the Vivitar you'd love the Voigtländer 125mm f2.5
(although maybe not the price so much ;-)
Cheers,
Dave
On 10/20/07, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice
David Savage wrote:
HA!
I could resist no longer either.
(Warning: some cat photos within)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/V125/V125.htm
Cheers,
Dave
Har :)
Cats are always better resolution targets than brick walls.
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like this snap, but there were sad consequences after right after this
shot. Had forgotten to charge the liths before the fest. So with the
camera juiceless, I had to watch many photo ops walk by. Pleasant
afternoon though.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_10/07_10_beer/01.htm
D
--
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Meet Fluffy...
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/PESO02/photo#5123874132768234114
I told my wife we had two skunks who occasionally came by at night. I
told her one was white. She threw out leftover popcorn this morning
and was thrilled to finally meet Fluffy up
I'll third that. She'll have lots of aunties and uncles around the globe
when she travels.
D
Bob Sullivan wrote:
I'll second that Bill.
She should be our adopted granddaughter.
Nice picture Paul...
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/21/07, Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lovely shot.
frank theriault wrote:
Still not sure about this one; sometimes I don't like it, sometimes
it's okay, sometimes it's better than okay.
Any thoughts?
http://tinyurl.com/34srg3
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RxyWRFjUSXI/A1M/gqjX5arUvnU/s1600-h/oct_22+006.jpg
cheers and
Part of Good Food Month, Hat's Off are special nights were restaurants
around town present a degustation off their normal flight path. We
booked early to avoid disappointment, and disappointed we were not.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_10/07_10_atelier/index.htm
Oh boy.
D
--
[EMAIL
wakka-chikka-wakka-chikka
In Sydney, it is hard for us to get to Grandfather Mountain. So GFM for
me is Good Food Month. Avert your eyes if ye must, because there is more
pork ahead.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_10/07_10_galileo/index.htm
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I know that there are a lot of flowers photos, but I'd like to share
with mine.
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=19305
Critique is wellcome!
Yuriy
I like it. Very theatrical lighting.
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rick Womer wrote:
A photo from our trip to Germany in June 2006.
I was wandering the back streets near the English
Garden when I was almost run over by this car
careening around the corner. I managed to get this
one shot. On the back there was a car that said Just
Married in two
Cotty wrote:
Haven't posted anything for ages, so must be about time. I took my lad
to Mercedes-Benz World at the former Brooklands racing circuit near
London on Monday (school holiday here this week) where he had a one hour
driving lesson in a Merc A-class. They do kids driving lessons, and
John Celio wrote:
http://www.neovenator.com/2007/10/am-now-officially-29.html
I've been getting some good buzz on this one, so I thought it might bee okay
to post here.
Specs:
*istD, ISO 400, D-FA 100 Macro, f2.8, 1/200
Thanks,
John
(for anyone who might have reason to contact me
I am not ashamed to say, I like looking at frocks.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_10/07_10_racefrock/01.htm
BTW, I know I am slack about thanking people for bouquets or brickbats,
but please be assured I always appreciate the time you take to comment. TIA.
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob Blakely wrote:
Make that:
http://www.bob.blakely.com/Garter.jpg
Regards,
Bob...
Art is not a reflection of reality. it is the reality of a reflection.
-Jean Luc Godard
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL
Cotty wrote:
On 27/10/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
However, it doesn't really matter about the difference, and it's not
Ann's eyes that are at fault. The important thing is that you're using
one of the combinations that every design guide recommends against
because of its
Roman Melihhov wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/r-rated/900x600-_IGP72730185.jpg
^^^ Colors and stones. Critique and feedback appreciated.
Well exposed and composed, Roman. But I have to say, where is the
humanist interest? Seems like a scene in search of an actor.
D
--
[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/27/2007 1:42:59 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not ashamed to say, I like looking at frocks.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_10/07_10_racefrock/01.htm
BTW, I know I am slack about thanking people for
Beaker wrote:
Snip:
I'd be a bit surprised if they were sending Old Peculier to Canada -
it generally doesn't travel well.
--
Bob
A buddy once had an Old Peculier in Washington DC.
He made a face, and said it was flat.
Everybody else asked How can you tell? That's
I already knew the DA40 was pretty good as a full frame lens. The DA70
isn't bad either - tiny bit of vignetting up to f2.8.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_10/07_10_DA/
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hello!
I finally bought a new DFA 100/2.8 Macro lens and found that
the clamp switch does not provide rock solid clamping.
It does provide a bit of dumping, and switches of AF, but
I can still manually change the focus without much of a problem.
Question to the happy
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Oct 5, 2007, at 14:24, Norm Baugher wrote:
Part two of the saga...
http://morris.blogs.nytimes.com/?themc=th
For those keeping up, I clicked on this old mail here and see that
Episode III of the Cannon Ball saga is up now.
-Charles
and a
If you are in Sydneytown, I highly recommend you drop by Paddington and
have a look at the Walkley photojournalism awards. A modest exhibition
of some superb work. Closing next week.
http://exhibitions.acp.org.au/exhibitions/gallery_3.php
I used to be a member of the ACP for the darkroom but
Comments welcome.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_11/07_11_pacifier/01.htm
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_11/07_11_siobhan/01.htm
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Jim King wrote:
Adam Maas wrote Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:24:24 -0800:
Both of these lenses have been available in the past in F mount, with
excellent reputations. The 40/2 is not one I'd pick over the 43,
but the
58 is very intersting as it duplicates a standard 35mm length that's
mostly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 11/3/2007 12:17:31 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There were a number of possible titles for this one, and a number of
different crops.
http://www.mindspring.com/~happydogsoftware/PESO%20--%20heartsoul.html
Equipment:
. There's a line below her
left eye however. You may want to remove that.
I love her name, too. My daughter Teagan was going to
be a Siobhan. But then, no one in America would spell
nor pronouce it correctly.
Teagan is bad enough it turns out.
-Brendan
--- Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Derby Chang wrote:
Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hello!
I finally bought a new DFA 100/2.8 Macro lens and found that
the clamp switch does not provide rock solid clamping.
It does provide a bit of dumping, and switches of AF, but
I can still manually change the focus without much of a problem
Yep, that's the K.
The seller says it is for both the SMC and the FA versions. The A* has a
narrower barrel and a bulbous front, so I guess doesn't fit the ring.
D
Bob Blakely wrote:
Actually, it's an smc PENTAX 1:4 300mm (that is: K)
Regards
Bob...
Don't know if there is any Pentax content in here, but there are some
great pics. I like the bird with a swirl for a head.
http://sawse.com/2007/11/02/25-photographs-taken-at-the-exact-right-time/
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_11/07_11_dive/01.htm
With the marvellous Voigtländer 180/4. Sharp, sharp, sharp.
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Sorting through the pics I shot for Lindsey's portfolio this
afternoon. At 5'91/2. size 4, she says she was too short and too
hefty for New York. (They want 5'11, size 2!). But she's doing well
in Detroit modeling circles. Shot many frames. Just started looking
Thibouille wrote:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/photographers-marketplace/14439-fs-lester-dine-105-2-8-macro.html
Funny :) :)
I think the Lester Dine is the same as the Vivitar Series 1, but with
extra markings. I love the Vivitar.
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yep, what Peter said. I admit I don't use the M135/3.5 much (I have a
few other 135s), but it is a great performer. I like the M200/4 (and
it's slightly more convenient brother A200/4) a lot. Both work well on
digital, and are really convenient walking-around lenses. Picked up the
M135 for
Jens Bladt wrote:
I did this logo proposal this evening:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/?saved=1
What do you think?
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 /
Paul Stenquist wrote:
If any one is still interested, these are the selects that Lindsey
wants to send to her agents. Comments welcome.
Paul
http://photo.net/photodb/folder.tcl?folder_id=782169
Hi Paul,
Much better to see a selection than just ones-and-twos. FWIW, my comments:
David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
I took this last weekend:
Small (1852x350 pixels, ~115kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/RBAR_002_sml.jpg
Medium (3175x600 pixels, ~310kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/RBAR_002_med.jpg
Large (4234x800 pixels, ~630kb)
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
I hope you can share some of your photos, even if they're from the
non-Pentax world.
Cory
Nice to hear from you again. Show us some photos.
Regards, Bob S.
Since there are so many pictures being posted here, I'm surprised to get
requests for even
Mark Roberts wrote:
Spent some time this afternoon scanning some medium format slides. For
your perusal:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704702.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704703.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704704.jpg
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d704706.jpg
How is everyone?
It's been a while, and I've missed the chat. Had a look at the new sleek
PUG too. Lovely work.
Nice to be back
Derby
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks Rick, I'd love a beer. Been out and about, taking the odd pic.
Anyway, enough about me. Did you see Albano mentioned in Mike Johnston's
blog? Good stuff. Is Albano still a list member?
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2007/09/random-excell-1.html
D
mike wilson wrote:
flinch
Brad?
/flinch
Oh! Sorry. Nice to see you back. What were you doing on the outside?
Wrestling with Panosaurus monsters :)
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_09/07_09_blackwattle/01.htm
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
Wow...I hear Lohengrin playing in my head when I see this.
D
Mark Cassino wrote:
Great ethereal quality to the light in this. I really
like the trees in the distance.
And shot on film too...
- MCC
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some long-time PDML folks might
mike wilson wrote:
From: Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/18 Tue AM 10:47:15 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Coming home
mike wilson wrote:
flinch
Brad?
/flinch
Oh! Sorry. Nice to see you back. What were you doing on the outside
I don't recall reading this manual, and found it accidentally when
shooting a show one night.
Set the K10D to digital preview, and take a preview shot. Then use the
up/down button to toggle between full histogram and RGB histogram. That
setting will be used for all instant review shots (if
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 18/09/2007, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't recall reading this manual, and found it accidentally when
shooting a show one night.
Set the K10D to digital preview, and take a preview shot. Then use the
up/down button to toggle between full
1 - 100 of 2417 matches
Mail list logo
