You know, it's not even fall yet.
rg2
On 9/18/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/18/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Kennedy wrote:
Is the size limit still 600 longest side?
No, it's not. The upload form limits the photo to 256k. The software
I'm
i think it would be an interesting theme
rg2
On 9/19/07, Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess it stands for 7 themes:
e, t, c, ., ., ., ..
:-)
Igor
Wed Sep 19 16:23:01 EDT 2007
Rebekah wrote:
is etc a theme?
rg2
On 9/19/07, Walter Hamler whamler at cfl.rr.com wrote
is etc a theme?
rg2
On 9/19/07, Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Travel
Food
Shoes
Patterns
Love
Macro
Circles
etc
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
the subject of a photograph is far less
use flash. it seems to be so popular ;)
rg2
On 9/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Adam,
I missed this post earlier. I tried looking at the gallery using Firefox on a
Mac at work. Only the first image was visible. The others all appeared about
80% out of frame.
Paul
] wrote:
Apparently poorly...
Adam Maas wrote:
Rebekah,
The viewer in question is written in Flash ;-)
-Adam
Rebekah wrote:
use flash. it seems to be so popular ;)
rg2
On 9/19/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Adam,
I missed this post earlier. I
That's an interesting shot. I really like it in color - the orange
pumpkin really makes the orange in the rust stand out.
rg2
On 9/20/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I couldn't decide if this should be a BW conversion or not so I did both
s.
On 9/20/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HAH! So you do like color.
Rebekah wrote:
That's an interesting shot. I really like it in color - the orange
pumpkin really makes the orange in the rust stand out.
rg2
On 9/20/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
sweet. egrets are cool, you got a nice shot there. How'd you make
them fly away? the ones around here just lok at me like I'm nuts and
keep fishing while I take pictures of them (bad ones).
rg2
On 9/20/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Probably last PESO for a while. Here is a shot
so if a sensor is right where two film grains meet with very different
colors or values, what does the pixel do? Does it choose one color or
the other, or does it appear as an everage between the two?
rg2
On 9/19/07, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rebekah wrote:
Thanks Doug, I think
On 9/21/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rebekah wrote:
sweet. egrets are cool, you got a nice shot there. How'd you make
them fly away? the ones around here just look at me like I'm nuts
and keep fishing while I take pictures of them (bad ones).
How do you tell a bad egret from
rg2
On 9/21/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rebekah wrote:
How do you tell a bad egret from a good one?
the bad ones show up as blown out on the pictures ;) therefore, I've
concluded that they're all evil.
Har!
This must be a good one, but just barely:
http
wait, if you could decrease the distance between the sensor and the
film, would the average be more accurate? What if pixels were a
different shape, like hexagons? Would it look better?
rg2
On 9/21/07, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so digital pixels suck in comparison to film grain
so digital pixels suck in comparison to film grain ;) gotcha.
rg2
PS thanks for taking the time to explain all that to me :)
On 9/21/07, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rebekah wrote:
so if a sensor is right where two film grains meet with very different
colors or values, what
Fri AM 11:56:10 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO -- With even more egret...
Rebekah wrote:
sweet. egrets are cool, you got a nice shot there. How'd you make
them fly away? the ones around here just look at me like I'm nuts
and keep fishing while I
I think that in the next five years
you're going to see almost a retro backlash because of the things that
film gives you that you can't get with digital.
what, like good pictures? ducking for cover
rg2
On 9/21/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/09/07, Scott Loveless, discombobulated,
have you had a chance to try that on someone else's scanner? That
looks interesting
rg2
On 9/21/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/09/2007, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wait, if you could decrease the distance between the sensor and the
film, would the average
that's why they're evil ;)
On 9/21/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's hard to shoot egrets, they're very white and yours shows no detail
in the feathers at all.
Rebekah wrote:
nice! I love that purple-looking water...where did you take that
picture? The water around here
nice picture! I love the angle. and the blue sky looks really great.
Your title reminds me of a game we play on newbie carpenters - we
send them looking for a skyhook and/or and board puller. We had
one kid walking around Charleston from theater to theater asking all
the crews there and they
I'd say try spot metering the Egret add a couple of stops then let the
rest of the tones in the image fall where they may, but none of your
cameras has a spot meter, (and unfortunately a hand held spot meter is
quite pricey), then bracket like hell.
Thanks :o) I only have one camera, a P30t, and
matrix metering, no compensation
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/52755519
That is a good picture, I love the comparison. Is it just me or does
the smaller fellow have a green leg? Anyways, I guess they're not
evil - your picture looks great :)
rg2
On 9/21/07, Christian [EMAIL
/PESO%20--%20withevenmoreegrets.html
Rebekah wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo?authkey=W1C-i05p28o#5112635158088756322
Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/graphics/pages/7d400403.htm
I have a few egrets of my own... Can I join
that's one lewd lizard.
rg2
On 9/21/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tickled me.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/lancashire/6999470.stm
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
No, only on my scanners to date.
oh I didn't realize you had more than one...hmm
Doug, thanks again for your answer. :) You have great explanations.
rg2
On 9/21/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/09/2007, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have you had a chance to try
beautiful! that's quite a specific category.
rg2
On 9/21/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/09/2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exquisite.
Wherever did you come up with the concept?
Thanks Godfrey, I've been toying with the concept since about age
LOL!! Procrastinating can be fun. Why do you have three scanners?
Are they each for different things, or are they different models as
you've accumulated them?
rg2
On 9/21/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/09/2007, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, only on my
have you ever gotten a picture of the shiny fangs of a jumping spider?
They jump around too much for me ;)
rg2
On 9/21/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/09/2007, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
beautiful!
Ah thanks, beauty is definitely in the eye of the bee holder
I guess he wasn't wearing a bra.
I don't think having a prosthetic leg with lizards in it and wearing a
bra are necessarily mutually exclusive ;)
rg2
On 9/22/07, Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess he wasn't wearing a bra.
Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/22/2007 4:09 AM
I like this one a lot.
Has anyone figured out what let's baja might mean? :o)
rg2
On 9/21/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/39e.htm
Thanks guys! I'm liking it too. Actually, I'm liking Cotty's K17/4FE
fitted on the L1 too much, damn
crazy! makes ya wonder if it reached its destination. Good grab there :)
rg2
On 9/23/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/22/2007 4:38:31 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another from my trip to James Bay.
Our detour road was a farly
Looks like graywolf was painting at rush hour again.
Nice shot, I would have walked by it too :)
rg2
On 9/23/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This would fit well with Godfrey's Ground Signs theme. It is a rather
nice shot - I suspect I would not have even noticed it.
--
Bruce
Looks cool, I love the color of the snail. Very beautiful. Snails
are so shy!
rg2
On 9/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/23/2007 8:50:04 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Too bad about the OOF stalk!
Kenneth Waller
Looks cool!
rg2
On 9/25/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 25, 2007, at 5:17 AM, frank theriault wrote:
Comments always welcome. Thanks in advance.
http://tinyurl.com/2bagpu
Nice one. A little muddy on the darker values, you could fix that
easily with a curves
ewww. that was hilarious and disgusting at the same time. thanks for that ;)
rg2
On 9/25/07, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh that's a messy picture Doug! Regards, Bob S.
On 9/24/07, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Robb wrote:
I saw one on Saturday, though not
Beautiful! I especially like that last one, the lighting is so nice.
rg2
On 9/25/07, Roman Melihhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/?year=2007s=0category=blog=20070925153916
^^^ while the lane is still very green, first signs of the fall are
placing spots on that
[...] hilarious and disgusting at the same time. [...]
If I had a MySpace or Facebook page, that'd be my description of myself. :-)
I think it would be an appropriate description for most men ;)
rg2
On 9/25/07, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rebekah wrote:
[...] hilarious
Absolutely lovely! I hope you feel better soon :)
rg2
On 9/25/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Beautiful. You should get a cold more often!
--- Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I Have spent the day at home with a bad cold, I
couldn't recist doing
thsi little series:
That's funny! I certainly hope you didn't sail too close ;)
rg2
On 9/25/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cory, the sign is hilarious. However photographically speaking, the all
blurred foreground is giving me headache, almost making me feel dizzy,
you know...
Boris
cbwaters
Thus, I ask the supremely elementary question: how does one
turn the zeros and ones stored in the DSLR's memory into prints?
just think of it this way: you're going to end up enabling yourself
with a printer. Then you're going to need to buy special paper,
special ink, and a special program to
Do those create much verticle banding, I wonder?
rg2
On 9/25/07, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/marcwathieu/1008140999/in/set-809983/
Not the sharpest lenses, I assume. ;)
John
--
http://www.neovenator.com
http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto
--
Hey guys, another picture of the little rug rat. Title courtesy of my
father :)
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo?authkey=W1C-i05p28o#5114307944771333234
comments and critiques welcome
rg2
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
it was outdated anyway)...
Rebekah wrote:
Thus, I ask the supremely elementary question: how does one
turn the zeros and ones stored in the DSLR's memory into prints?
just think of it this way: you're going to end up enabling yourself
with a printer. Then you're going to need to buy special
Some of those old lenses still work pretty darned well.
It's all manual in my ~huge~ photo bag.
rg2
On 9/25/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Glen Tortorella
Subject: Re: Digital SLR Guide News - Best Budget DSLR
Wow, Rebekah, you have hit
a bandsaw, perhaps? ;)
rg2
On 9/25/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's no such thing as vertical banding, that's just an old saw...
Rebekah wrote:
Do those create much verticle banding, I wonder?
rg2
On 9/25/07, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http
fine :)~ sue me.
On 9/25/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wasn't trying to be so obvious...
Rebekah wrote:
a bandsaw, perhaps? ;)
rg2
On 9/25/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's no such thing as vertical banding, that's just an old saw...
Rebekah
Why do you need a ~huge~ photo bag?
film. ;)
rg2
On 9/25/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 25, 2007, at 6:29 PM, Rebekah wrote:
Some of those old lenses still work pretty darned well.
It's all manual in my ~huge~ photo bag.
Why do you need a ~huge~ photo bag?
I'm
, Rebekah wrote:
Why do you need a ~huge~ photo bag?
film. ;)
Hmm. I'm using the same Domke F5XB bag I used to carry my Nikon FM
and Leica M6 in...
Camera, two/three lenses, and a half dozen rolls of film fit without
too much problem.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Great grab! They look so sweet :o)
rg2
On 9/26/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess there are times that the one just feels the urge:
http://tinyurl.com/2apt6p
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RvpM9MA-_jI/Avk/BTTm0Lykn54/s1600-h/sept_25+001.jpg
Comments welcome.
again guys :o)
rg2
On 9/26/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/07, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys, another picture of the little rug rat. Title courtesy of my
father :)
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo?authkey=W1C-i05p28o#5114307944771333234
cut them out with a T-square and box cutter
Have you ever tried a rotary cutter? You can get pretty straight
lines with those.
rg2
On 9/26/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a mat room cutting board with one-inch increments marked. One
of the ad agencies I worked for let me
Frank, I think your photographs are beautiful. Screw the gallery.
rg2
On 9/27/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/27 Thu AM 03:24:42 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
Lovely :o)
rg2
On 9/27/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom C wrote:
Outside a Florist's shop.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6468680
Going all Godfrey on us, eh?
Nice work.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
cool, but I didn't see any purple flame designs. Count me out. ;)
rg2
On 9/27/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On topic for a change!
Interesting site - have a look:
http://www.cameraleather.com/
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
cool pictures ;)
rg2
On 9/28/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 28, 2007, at 9:14 AM, David Savage wrote:
I think it has something to do with the corellas effect.
Only if you're driving a Toyota Corellas.
I guess that it isn't the corellas effect.
I drive a
Beautiful, very nicely done.
rg2
On 9/28/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great image Tom, as usual
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Interplay
Wow, nicely caught and framed. Looks like that guy in blue is
seriously about to get it. Great colors too.
rg2
On 9/28/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/07, Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6471235
Comments/critique
Cool photo. I like your angle - at first I didn't but a second look
convinced me otherwise. The contrast is great. It almost looks like
it was taken in 1871 instead of 1971.
hehe
rg2
On 9/28/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rebekah wrote:
link! link...?
oops ooops
http
link! link...?
On 9/28/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just printed this one up and sold to the guy who is opeing a coffee bar
where the open Thursday only sign is.
Pentax kx - can't remember lens I had then...
Thinking now of doing a calendar of the east village in the 70's
It depends on what I'm taking pictures of. If I'm going to go take
pictures outside, I like fuji, it's greens are fantastic. But, kodak
has great reds. I try to stay away from 800 speed because I don't
like the grain, and I prefer 200 or 400 in either brand.
rg2
On 9/28/07, Glen Tortorella
BTW Glen -
I usually take my pictures with available light and use 400 speed fuji
or kodak gold, and I really feel like the Fuji outperforms the Kodak
in low light situations. Its contrast and grain hold up even when I'm
taking dim indoor pictures at 1/30 or even 1/4s. I like Kodak much
better
camera today. I just took a picture of my one year-old getting a
bath, and I I thought I was pushing it ay 1/45...
Thanks,
Glen
On Sep 29, 2007, at 7:44 PM, Rebekah wrote:
BTW Glen -
I usually take my pictures with available light and use 400 speed fuji
or kodak gold, and I really feel
Honestly? I've got them all stashed in a big photo box
rg2
On 9/30/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I frame a few, I sell a few, I give a lot away, and the rest get
packed in big boxes and stored on shelves in my dehumidified
basement. To be forgotten and rediscovered some rainy
including the boat tour of the swamps.
rg2
On 9/7/07, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
looks interesting, and I'm close enough to do that for a weekend
trip, but my schedule is pretty well full up in October. Maybe in the
spring?
I also want to try to get time to do a War Tour: Savannah (8th
That thing is adorable - I bet they're a nuisance tho. Nice grab!
rg2
On 9/30/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool. I worked in Queensland farm country for three weeks and never
saw one. I was bummed:-).
Paul
On Sep 29, 2007, at 11:21 PM, John Coyle wrote:
No, we don't
This is why women take so long to get ready:
http://picasaweb.google.com/rg2pdml/PESO/photo?authkey=W1C-i05p28o#5116085567975433026
We have little 'helpers'.
rg2
--
the subject of a photograph is far less important than its composition
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
thanks guys ;)
rg2
On 9/30/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very cute! If that is the reason, then it is a great one.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, September 30, 2007, 12:45:26 PM, you wrote:
R This is why women take so long to get ready:
R
Doug, if I reschedule, is there another day that's better for you?
rg2
On 9/30/07, Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rebekah wrote:
Hey, I'm going next Sunday if anyone's interested, if anyone decides
to come I'll serve up some homemade lasagna and maybe a decent wine.
Weather should
I love it! great colors and the water drops really make it :)
rg2
On 10/1/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 1, 2007, at 3:07 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
http://www.blognow.com.au/PESO/74336/A_Single_Leaf.html
quite beautiful! thank you. :-)
Godfrey
--
PDML
I have several rolls. I'll be shooting it soon, hopefully I'll turn
out a few shots and share them with the list. I've got my fingers
crossed :-)
rg2
On 10/1/07, Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What formats is it available in?
If that is true then that is truly good news.
Rgds
I like the second one very much, it has great detail and an
interesting angle. The first one is good but the sky kind of washes
it out. The color on the boats is great though :-)
rg2
On 10/1/07, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, strange.
I tried the links in the first message and
Just found this interesting, what do you guys think?
http://www.thestate.com/local/story/190126.html
rg2
--
the subject of a photograph is far less important than its composition
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
said, I'm somewhat ambivalent about being restricted
from
taking pictures of something which is on private property, but from
a
public property position.
Jack
--- Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just found this interesting, what do you guys think?
http
I don't see how this guy making money off of the photographs could be
considered damages. They certainly didn't lose any money just
because he made some - from what I can tell the clause on the property
said 'no photographs for commercial gain' - not, 'if you make some
money, you have to share'.
I think software copying is entirely different - if I were to copy
some software and give it to you, the company that made it would lose
money because you didn't purchase it from them.
On 10/8/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:23:09AM -0400, Rebekah wrote
?).
Again, the scanner route is still questionable for me. While it has
its advantages--in terms of control of print quality, etc.--it, to
me, seems like it is rather limiting, too. Then there is the *total*
start-up cost that few, with the exception of Rebekah, seem to
acknowledge. Yes
U, this sounds a little bit centrist to me. Some of us aren't
Christians, after all.
I don't celebrate Christmas either, I'm a Christian, but it certainly
doesn't mean that I can't find anything worth photographing during the
holiday season. There are several holidays celebrated at that time
Perhaps it shouldn't, but you are trying to make your point by quoting a
Christmas carol.
Like most things Christian, I'm willing to bet this song is borrowed
and twisted beyond recognition.
rg2
On 10/10/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps it shouldn't, but you are trying to
Hey, in line with the original topic, I brought some Ektachrome
tungsten film to Walgreens to have it mailed away to be developed, and
wherever on earth they sent it, they screwed it up royally.
rg2
On 10/10/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Walmart Legal here.
We respectfully request,
Hey. They probably ran it through C-41 chemicals.
Strangely they came back as slides as well as prints. Frankly, I
don't know what on earth they did.
rg2
On 10/10/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: cbwaters
Subject: Re: More film processing
Nice shots you've got there, I love hockey. I hope you had fun! Of
course, Rick is right, you can't shoot sports with Pentax ;)
rg2
On 10/13/07, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basketball - A truly Canadian sport. It was invented by a Canadian who
moved to the US to make money.
-Adam
this was the only BW film available and
would work with standard chemicals.
This was 2002 btw.
Big bummer was they were wedding shots.
Dave
Scott Loveless wrote:
Rebekah wrote:
Hey, in line with the original topic, I brought some Ektachrome
tungsten film to Walgreens to have it mailed away
Very interesting pictures, I also like the idea of them holding the
flash. Some really great angles you got in there :)
rg2
On 10/13/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:-)
On 10/12/07, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/12/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
shoot, I don't know anything about bones, but it looks like a 'clean'
break, or at least I don't see bone fragments everywhere. Sorry to
hear about your fall! I sure hope you get well soon. I'm glad you
got through the medical center quickly. I hate after-hours
emergencies - last time I had
I love that page. It's something I turn to very frequently when I
have questions or ideas. Sometimes I wish there were a space where I
could find a relative price range to expect on used lenses, but other
than that I think that page has never let me down when I serach for
information. Happy
great photos, some of them gave me a great laugh but they are all
fantasic photos - not just quick shots of funny signs but also
well-composed. :o)
rg2
On 10/13/07, Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I really enjoyed the images - wry and interesting
compositions. Manhattan Cafe is my
Well, I finally made it out to the gardens at the Magnolia Plantation.
I can't say enough about the place - everywhere I looked there was a
beautiful scene, animal, or flower to photograph, and the weather
turned out to be perfect - first foggy, then sunny with everything
covered in dew, and then
How funny! Keep on with that careful technique :) you subjects look
quite animated. Nice composition.
rg2
On 10/13/07, Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Made me look twice. If you had snuck a lit cigarette
in the front model's fingers, I would have looked
three times... :-)
- MCC
Beautiful, I love that picture, the texture is great :)
rg2
On 10/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup, think that is what it is.
Thanks, Jack.
Marnie :-)
===
Sandstone Lace. (looks like sandstone anyway) ;)
The affects of time and the elements are well
Velvia
pics.
Paul
On Oct 13, 2007, at 10:36 AM, Rebekah wrote:
Well, I finally made it out to the gardens at the Magnolia Plantation.
I can't say enough about the place - everywhere I looked there was a
beautiful scene, animal, or flower to photograph, and the weather
turned out
nice! I love the long foreground as well
rg2
On 10/15/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think so too. But then, who ever said you needed teeth to be a
photographer? ;-)
G
On Oct 15, 2007, at 7:27 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Not a bad shot for a toothless old republican...
This will stop the casual web browser. As has been mentioned before, nothing
can stop the serious people who are intent on grabbing your content no
matter what.
You know, I tried that out of curiosity, and although I couldn't
right-click, the little box that offers me the options to save, print
Great! I love the color in this one and the expressions are great :)
rg2
On 10/15/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what you mean, but I appreciate the comments. Thanks for looking.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David Savage
Nice colors in that one, the green is beautifully rich and I love the
reflection in between.
rg2
On 10/16/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/15/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Taken in
cool lighting! very creepy...
rg2
On 10/13/07, Evan Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great Shot!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
He looks either very tired, in deep thought, or possibly quite drunk
;) nice grab! :o)
rg2
On 10/16/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today seems to be profile day. ;-)
Toronto bike messenger Rob Zombie (In reality his last name isn't
Zombie - isn't there a rock star, perhaps
oh yeah, my one photo there is SO impressive ;)
no, I know what you mean, I browse through it when I'm bored and it
always makes me feel very eager to run out with my camera. Some of
the pictures there are downright magnificent.
rg2
On 10/16/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark
Beautiful! Nice detail, lovely color on that :o)
rg2
On 10/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 10/16/2007 11:52:22 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's one I caught in the last week of Sept. at the
World Famous San Diego Zoo:
.
:-)
Dave
On 10/13/07, Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I finally made it out to the gardens at the Magnolia Plantation.
I can't say enough about the place - everywhere I looked there was a
beautiful scene, animal, or flower to photograph, and the weather
turned out to be perfect
I abosolutely love the skateboarding shot. The action is fantastic,
all I can say is I wish you had gotten the rest of that arm in! Very,
very cool pictures :o)
rg2
On 10/17/07, Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just some fun stuff experimenting with trailing
curtain flash. Enjoy!
Strangely, I am unable to access this picture, neither explorer nor
firefox wanted to open it. :(
rg2
On 10/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice. Good detail in the highlights. He looks damned uncomfortable:-).
Paul
-- Original message
beautiful contrast, I abosolutely love this picture. I like the
design in the pool, it adds a nice texture contrast with the plants in
the top. Absolutely fantastic. :))
rg2
On 10/16/07, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Ok, a last photo for the week ...
1 - 100 of 714 matches
Mail list logo
