Pål wrote:
PJ Not very likely I'm afraid. According to Pentax sources at this
PJ part of the world, out of 14 000 DSLR sold about 40 will be *ist
PJ D's. About 13 960 are Nikon or Canon models.
That accounts then to what? ... 500 units per month? Are they hand
assembled!? Then perhaps the
-
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: *ist-D in DPReview Pentax Forum
Mark wrote:
It looks like a number of brand-agnostic folks have compared the *ist-D
head-to-head against the Canon
Hi all,
I've been lurking in the DPReview Pentax forum. It's an interesting read.
It looks like a number of brand-agnostic folks have compared the *ist-D
head-to-head against the Canon 10D and Nikon D100 and have chosen the
*ist-D. This, along with the reviews that are being published,
Mark Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some people seem to be quite happy dropping US$1700 on a new camera body and
hanging a slow, cheap US$100 zoom on it. Amazing. In a way, Pentax seems
to be encouraging this kind of behavior by creating a mediocre kit lens to
go with the *ist-D.
Oh
I hope, hope, hope, hope that Pentax is sending the *ist-D
out to reviewers with good lenses (preferably at least one Limited),
rather than just the cheapo zooms.
Nope, it looks like it is being reviewed with the FAJ 18-35.
Joe
For the *ist D, the FA-J 18-35 is not bad at all, as its limited
zooming range and speed much help its optical quality! IMHO and from my
2-day experience the FA-J is as good as the chip of the *ist D requires
it to be.
Arnold
Joseph Tainter schrieb:
I hope, hope, hope, hope that Pentax is
6 matches
Mail list logo
