Mark, I think it work fine as part of a series of images. As a stand
alone image, it is not that strong...
Boris
Mark Roberts wrote:
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not completely happy
with either yet...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
K10D, 77 Ltd, ISO 400
On 1/22/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Savage wrote:
I notice the file is tagged for ProPhotoRGB colour space. It looks
much better viewed in PS IMO.
Aaaargh! No wonder people aren't seeing what I'm seeing!
Thanks for tipping me off, Dave.
No worries
One of the revisions
I notice the file is tagged for ProPhotoRGB colour space. It looks
much better viewed in PS IMO.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/22/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 21, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not completely happy
with
David Savage wrote:
I notice the file is tagged for ProPhotoRGB colour space. It looks
much better viewed in PS IMO.
Aaaargh! No wonder people aren't seeing what I'm seeing!
Thanks for tipping me off, Dave. One of the revisions I've been doing
to my web site is making sure all the images in the
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts Subject: Re: Another PESO from Florida
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
Try:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/oldtree.jpg
It's still a sucky picture.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not completely happy
with either yet...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
K10D, 77 Ltd, ISO 400
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Mark,
Methinks it needs a wider tonal range.
Rick
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not
completely happy
with either yet...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
K10D, 77 Ltd, ISO 400
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Jan 21, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not completely happy
with either yet...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
K10D, 77 Ltd, ISO 400
I like it, but it's a little dark overall. Also, a high frequency
image like that
Could also stand a not so tightly cropped view perhaps.
--
Bruce
Sunday, January 21, 2007, 9:54:29 AM, you wrote:
RW Mark,
RW Methinks it needs a wider tonal range.
RW Rick
RW --- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not
completely happy
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not completely happy
with either yet...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
In terms of the tones, I probably would have done something like this:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Could also stand a not so tightly cropped view perhaps.
The version on line is slightly cropped from the full image and
actually works much better than the uncropped version.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jan 21, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not completely happy
with either yet...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
K10D, 77 Ltd, ISO 400
I like it, but it's a little dark overall.
I tried a few
Mark Roberts wrote:
I've tried color and b/w versions of this one. Not completely happy
with either yet...
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
K10D, 77 Ltd, ISO 400
Hard to say, Mark. I htink I'm getting at what you are trying to convey
here - the brooding deep ancient tree
Mark Cassino wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/oldtree.jpg
Definitely not an image that works well at web size - which of course
means nothing since web size is the equivalent of a 4 x6 at best.
I'd probably try to play with the tonal ranges to boost the contrast
14 matches
Mail list logo
