- Original Message -
From: Dr E D F Williams
Subject: Re: BW film/developer combinations
I know it can be pushed. But I don't want to start all that
over again. It's
been six months at least since we discussed that topic.
You must have ignored my evidence to the contrary.
William
-Original Message-
From: Andre Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
- Original Message -
From: Dr E D F Williams
Subject: Re: BW film/developer combinations
I know it can be pushed. But I don't want to start all that
over again. It's
been six months at least since
- Original Message -
From: Dr E D F Williams
Subject: Re: BW film/developer combinations
I know it can be pushed. But I don't want to start all that
over again. It's
been six months at least since we discussed that topic.
You must have ignored my evidence to the contrary
- Original Message -
From: Andre Langevin
Subject: Re: BW film/developer combinations
I missed the discussion. Is a resume possible?
Like Tom says, discussion is pointless.
I will post some evidence in the near future.
William Robb
: Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax discussion group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: BW film/developer combinations
« Mike Johnston » Mike Johnston wrote :
Without a doubt, the chromogenic films. Ilford XP-2 is the one I've used
mostly. You can
Butch
C-41 processing is similar to processing photo paper in that it can NOT be
pulled or pushed.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax discussion group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: BW film/developer
Subject: Re: BW film/developer combinations
I'm surprised to hear that as I know for sure that C-41, like E-6,
can be played with at home or in a big commercial processor. Maybe
you wanted to say should not (for better results)?
Andre
C-41 processing is similar to processing photo paper
-Original Message-
From: T Rittenhouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
A mini-lab can not push or pull it. A pro-lab with dip and
dunk can, and you
can, of course, do it at home.
Some of the newer mini-lab machines allow a push.
tv
- Original Message -
From: Dr E D F Williams
Subject: Re: BW film/developer combinations
I know it can be pushed. But I don't want to start all that
over again. It's
been six months at least since we discussed that topic.
You must have ignored my evidence to the contrary.
William
Hi all...
Here's a quick poll for all you BW junkies out there: What's your favorite
film and developer combination for reduced or non-existent grain? I'm
thinking of 8x10 to 11x14 enlargements of portraits.
Thanks,
Tim
I processed APX 100 in D-76 last night and the negatives look great very
smooth. I making some prints this weekend I'll let you know how they come
out on Monday.
Evan
From: Timothy Sherburne
Subject: BW film/developer combinations...
Hi all...
Here's a quick poll for all you BW junkies
--- Timothy Sherburne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all...
Here's a quick poll for all you BW junkies out
there: What's your favorite
film and developer combination for reduced or
non-existent grain? I'm
thinking of 8x10 to 11x14 enlargements of portraits.
Delta 100 in PMK Pyro. Fuji Acros
« Mike Johnston » Mike Johnston wrote :
Without a doubt, the chromogenic films. Ilford XP-2 is the one I've used
mostly. You can shoot portraits at 200, 100, or even 50
The problem is that most of us don't do C41 at home. Should we ask the lab
for a pull-process when rated at iso 50 or should
The problem is that most of us don't do C41 at home. Should we ask the lab
for a pull-process when rated at iso 50 or should the standard development
be fine with 3 stops overexposure ?
Thibault,
I've never done anything but standard development. I'll send you a copy of
that scan; it was made
14 matches
Mail list logo
