Re: GESO - PDML Refus?s

2010-05-11 Thread phil
This one was my favourite for inclusion in the book, with the other two just making up the numbers. But it is the editor's job to put together a cohesive collection and of course Mark has a different perspective, probably more objective in this case, than me. K10D DA* 50-135mm ISO 1000 1/25sec

Re: GESO - PDML Refus�s

2010-05-10 Thread mike wilson
Graydon gray...@marost.ca wrote: I rejected this one by not sending it in: http://picasaweb.google.ca/lh/photo/Sq0e0U5ChP1EJoH8TViR2A?feat=directlink These two were rejected by the editors, presumptively because they're not cormorants:

Re: GESO - PDML Refus?s

2010-05-09 Thread Steve Sharpe
At 1:07 AM +0200 5/10/10, eckinator wrote: 2010/5/10 Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com: My reject: http://decluttr.com/3898189541 No wonder with all that orange peel distortion, especially in the center of the image - looks like your lens coating may be coming loose Cheers Ecke Here's

Re: GESO - PDML Refus?s

2010-05-09 Thread Steve Sharpe
At 5:00 PM -0700 5/9/10, Tim Bray wrote: 2010/5/9 Steve Sharpe d...@eastlink.ca: Here's one of mine - http://earth.delith.com/bluenoseflag.html Obviously you picked the wrong country. -T I wondered about that... ;-) (I think we should follow the quickly-established tradition of

Re: GESO - PDML Refus�s

2010-05-09 Thread Graydon
I rejected this one by not sending it in: http://picasaweb.google.ca/lh/photo/Sq0e0U5ChP1EJoH8TViR2A?feat=directlink These two were rejected by the editors, presumptively because they're not cormorants: http://picasaweb.google.ca/lh/photo/1kGTPYcvc64EnB7H2hafow?feat=directlink