Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

He's a total Arse. It's bad enough that he tries to evaluate something when he's never had his hands on it, but disparaging those afflicted with a handicap really goes over the line... -p On 2/20/2016 1:32 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: His ignorance of photography is well known, but I didn't

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

On 2/21/2016 9:58 AM, Bill wrote: On 2/21/2016 8:52 AM, Christine Aguila wrote: On Feb 21, 2016, at 8:45 AM, Bill wrote: On 2/21/2016 8:31 AM, Christine Aguila wrote: That piece is spectacularly ridiculous! And by the way, that’s a crappy looking blog.

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

On 2/21/2016 9:45 AM, Bill wrote: On 2/21/2016 8:31 AM, Christine Aguila wrote: That piece is spectacularly ridiculous! And by the way, that’s a crappy looking blog. Cheers, Christine But apparently he makes 11k per month off of it, so he must know what he is talking about. Who says he

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

I should probably read the article before criticizing it, but given that it's kennyboy ... On 2/20/2016 4:38 PM, Rob Studdert wrote: He really should give up both writing and photography immediately, he has obviously wasted his 40 years. On 21 February 2016 at 06:35, Bruce Walker

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

On 2/20/2016 1:35 PM, Kim Tang wrote: FWIW... http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/00-new-today.htm Must be taken with grain of salt. Kim NaCN -- Science - Questions we may never find answers for. Religion - Answers we must never question. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

On 2/21/2016 8:52 AM, Christine Aguila wrote: On Feb 21, 2016, at 8:45 AM, Bill wrote: On 2/21/2016 8:31 AM, Christine Aguila wrote: That piece is spectacularly ridiculous! And by the way, that’s a crappy looking blog. Cheers, Christine But apparently he

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

> On Feb 21, 2016, at 8:45 AM, Bill wrote: > > On 2/21/2016 8:31 AM, Christine Aguila wrote: >> That piece is spectacularly ridiculous! And by the way, that’s a crappy >> looking blog. Cheers, Christine >> > > But apparently he makes 11k per month off of it, so

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

On 2/21/2016 8:31 AM, Christine Aguila wrote: That piece is spectacularly ridiculous! And by the way, that’s a crappy looking blog. Cheers, Christine But apparently he makes 11k per month off of it, so he must know what he is talking about. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

That piece is spectacularly ridiculous! And by the way, that’s a crappy looking blog. Cheers, Christine > On Feb 20, 2016, at 12:35 PM, Kim Tang wrote: > > FWIW... > > http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/00-new-today.htm > > Must be taken with grain of salt. > > Kim > >

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

On 20/2/16, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed: >I always knew he was a waste of bandwidth. Now I realize he's a waste >of oxygen as well. Er MARK -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production -- _ --

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

On 20/2/16, Kim Tang, discombobulated, unleashed: > >http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/00-new-today.htm > >Must be taken with grain of salt. "I can do without Pentax' primitive DSLRs unless I was some Aspergers case hoping to use my ancient manual-focus Pentax lenses" He's a complete moron. I'm

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

The fifth point should read "... the lost points off your IQ..." I only just skimmed the first paragraph, and you can see the effect it had on me. On 2/20/2016 4:45 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: On 2/20/2016 1:35 PM, Kim Tang wrote: FWIW... http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/00-new-today.htm Must be

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

Finally scrolled down his page, it's nice to see that he's started to post mostly B renderings so he can no longer insult those of us with normal color vision with his version of reality. On 2/20/2016 1:35 PM, Kim Tang wrote: FWIW... http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/00-new-today.htm Must be

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

Long and hard? Dick? Oh dear! Cheers, frank On February 20, 2016 2:35:28 PM EST, Bruce Walker wrote: ><<< I've been shooting long and hard for over 40 years >>> > >What a dick. > > >On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 1:47 PM, David Parsons > wrote: >>

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

On 2/20/2016 2:35 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: <<< I've been shooting long and hard for over 40 years >>> What a dick. Calling him a dick is an insult to dicks. On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 1:47 PM, David Parsons wrote: Ken Rockwell is an idiot. I really don't understand

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

On 2/20/2016 1:35 PM, Kim Tang wrote: FWIW... http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/00-new-today.htm Must be taken with grain of salt. Kim Kennyboy is a master of the hands off review. Basically he's the trap for photo noobs, where he turns them into nubes. I was going to say Kennyboy is

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

He really should give up both writing and photography immediately, he has obviously wasted his 40 years. On 21 February 2016 at 06:35, Bruce Walker wrote: > <<< I've been shooting long and hard for over 40 years >>> > > What a dick. > > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 1:47

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016, at 06:32 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > His ignorance of photography is well known, but I didn't think he would > mock those with a neurological disability. His sponsors should be made > aware of those demeaning and woefully inappropriate references. Yes - I didn't think it

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

Paul Stenquist wrote: >His ignorance of photography is well known, but I didn't think he would mock >those >with a neurological disability. His sponsors should be made aware of those >demeaning and woefully inappropriate references. I always knew he was a waste of bandwidth. Now I realize

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Toine wrote: > I need a bucket! "Get me a bucket" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzxf0mZNsv4=PLcmDauFQMJbTZxUgLYgOH6JjKnYSAIgd8=1 -- “The Earth is Art, The Photographer is only a Witness ” ― Yann Arthus-Bertrand, Earth from Above -- PDML

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

<<< I've been shooting long and hard for over 40 years >>> What a dick. On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 1:47 PM, David Parsons wrote: > Ken Rockwell is an idiot. I really don't understand why anyone who > isn't a complete noob would ever read his site. > > I feel bad for

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

His ignorance of photography is well known, but I didn't think he would mock those with a neurological disability. His sponsors should be made aware of those demeaning and woefully inappropriate references. Paul via phone > On Feb 20, 2016, at 2:08 PM, Toine wrote: > > I

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

I need a bucket! On 20 February 2016 at 19:47, David Parsons wrote: > Ken Rockwell is an idiot. I really don't understand why anyone who > isn't a complete noob would ever read his site. > > I feel bad for giving him the page view to read that garbage. > > On Sat, Feb

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

That's an amazing piece of writing. A good example of "not even wrong". B > On 20 Feb 2016, at 18:48, David Parsons wrote: > > Ken Rockwell is an idiot. I really don't understand why anyone who > isn't a complete noob would ever read his site. > > I feel bad for

Re: Ken Rockwell on the K-1

Ken Rockwell is an idiot. I really don't understand why anyone who isn't a complete noob would ever read his site. I feel bad for giving him the page view to read that garbage. On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Kim Tang wrote: > FWIW... > >

Ken Rockwell on the K-1

FWIW... http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/00-new-today.htm Must be taken with grain of salt. Kim -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.