Hi Boris,
on 27 Feb 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
Darn, I've responded to the wrong address. I meant to be private
response. Not that there is any slip of tongue, but I simply meant it
to be private.
No problem - I also make this mistake regularly... ;-)
Cheers, Heiko
Hi Boris,
on 09 Feb 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
If you decide to sell it anyway, don't forget to give me a call,
that is send an e-mail...
If you are still interested in my 28-70/4.0 then you can have it. I've
decided to sell it as I prefer my 28-105 Powerzoom. I have also a SMC FA
There is only one version of Portra 800. The VC and NC options are for
160 and 400 only. There is also a C-41 BW Portra 400 BW.
Portra (For PORTRA(it), comes in VC and NC. As a
portrait film, it excels in skin tones.
Caution: with VC, fair skinned women look best,
average skin next and ruddy
-Original Message-
From: Michael Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Superior Pentax
There is only one version of Portra 800. The VC and NC
options are for
160 and 400 only. There is also a C-41 BW
From: Heiko Hamann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just want to tell you of an experience of success that I had on
Friday. We were invited to a wedding last summer and our friends did ask
me, if I could make some photos. I didn't feel like doing it, so I only
took my MZ-5n with the
Does it? I'd sure like to see some examples you've done with Portra 800.
Doug
At 4:24 PM -08002/9/03, Matt Greene wrote, or at least typed:
I have no idea of what film sped you were using. But
Iimprovesilm inproves your chances over any other
speeds. Nearly any camera/flash combination
Heiko,
If you decide to sell it anyway, don't forget to give me a call,
that is send an e-mail...
---
Boris Liberman
www.geocities.com/dunno57
www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=38625
On Sunday 09 February 2003 13:29, Heiko Hamann wrote:
Comparing camera's/lenses based on results of the prints from
(different) labs is .. well ... not so straightforward, I would say.
Of course you are right. I didn't want to make an objective comparison
but to tell you a nice anecdote of my
Hi, Heiko,
I wouldn't discount the photographer being part of the equation. Even with
auto-everything cameras, I wonder if maybe hand-holding with more stability
could account for much of the difference in sharpness you noticed.
regards,
frank
Heiko Hamann wrote:
Hi,
I just want to tell
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Peter Smekal wrote:
I had the same good experience with this combo in various situations. So
much for the 5n Bummer!
Bah, the viewfinder still bites.. :)
--
http://www.infotainment.org - more fun than a poke in your eye.
http://www.eighteenpercent.com-
Well, you can't always get everything you want. I am not a pro in
photography, but I have used Pentax-cameras in my work as anthropologist. I
have for instance used the 5n-combo (lense/flash) when shooting festival
sceneries at night. I was very satisfied with the result. I am not sure if
it had
On Sunday, Feb 9, 2003, at 12:53 Europe/Warsaw, Heiko Hamann wrote:
The experience of success was, that my pictures stick out regarding
best
sharpness, contrast and brilliance. The difference was significant! As
I
had used AF and matrix metering, this success cannot be attibuted to
the
On Sunday, Feb 9, 2003, at 14:05 Europe/Warsaw, Boris Liberman wrote:
Heiko, you've done a terrible thing. Now I want to buy 28-70/4 even
more than ever so that I can replace my Sigma 28-135/3.8-5.6 IF AF
Macro...
Hi Boris,
I don't think you will gain much by switching from this Sigma to
Frits,
I was also thinking of better films. Perhaps theirs were shot on a
poor film for the event. I recently had a friend assist me with a
wedding. He shot a Canon Rebel with Canon zoom (consumer grade), used
one of my AF360FGZ flashes in Auto mode on it and used film that I
provided him. I
--- Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, Feb 9, 2003, at 12:53 Europe/Warsaw,
Heiko Hamann wrote:
The experience of success was, that my pictures
stick out regarding
best
sharpness, contrast and brilliance. The difference
was significant! As
I
had used AF and
Congratulations... to Pentax! :-) Now you have a definite reason NOT
to get the MZ-S...
I think Heiko should do more tests to make sure his MZ-5n was not as good as
he thought then. ;-)
regards,
Alan Chan
_
The new MSN 8:
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Matt Greene wrote:
Kodak Portra 800 excels at indoor flash pictures.
Any idea how it handles skin tones?
chris
I am very satisfied with the skintones of Portra 800.
Chris Brogden wrote:
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Matt Greene wrote:
Kodak Portra 800 excels at indoor flash pictures.
Any idea how it handles skin tones?
chris
18 matches
Mail list logo