Hi Boris,
on 27 Feb 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
Darn, I've responded to the wrong address. I meant to be private
response. Not that there is any slip of tongue, but I simply meant it
to be private.
No problem - I also make this mistake regularly... ;-)
Cheers, Heiko
Hi Boris,
on 09 Feb 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
If you decide to sell it anyway, don't forget to give me a call,
that is send an e-mail...
If you are still interested in my 28-70/4.0 then you can have it. I've
decided to sell it as I prefer my 28-105 Powerzoom. I have also a SMC FA
frank theriault wrote:
I continue to be amazed at how many on this list are
unemployed/underemployed, yet are still able to pursue this pastime,
which, let's face it, isn't the cheapest around.
Good luck finding a job, Boris. g
cheers,
frank
Because we all bought our cameras when wer
There is only one version of Portra 800. The VC and NC options are for
160 and 400 only. There is also a C-41 BW Portra 400 BW.
Portra (For PORTRA(it), comes in VC and NC. As a
portrait film, it excels in skin tones.
Caution: with VC, fair skinned women look best,
average skin next and ruddy
-Original Message-
From: Michael Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Superior Pentax
There is only one version of Portra 800. The VC and NC
options are for
160 and 400 only. There is also a C-41 BW
From: Heiko Hamann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just want to tell you of an experience of success that I had on
Friday. We were invited to a wedding last summer and our friends did ask
me, if I could make some photos. I didn't feel like doing it, so I only
took my MZ-5n with the
Does it? I'd sure like to see some examples you've done with Portra 800.
Doug
At 4:24 PM -08002/9/03, Matt Greene wrote, or at least typed:
I have no idea of what film sped you were using. But
Iimprovesilm inproves your chances over any other
speeds. Nearly any camera/flash combination
Hi,
I just want to tell you of an experience of success that I had on
Friday. We were invited to a wedding last summer and our friends did ask
me, if I could make some photos. I didn't feel like doing it, so I only
took my MZ-5n with the SMC-FA 28-70/4 and the AF500FTZ and shot 4 or 5
Heiko,
If you decide to sell it anyway, don't forget to give me a call,
that is send an e-mail...
---
Boris Liberman
www.geocities.com/dunno57
www.photosig.com/viewuser.php?id=38625
On Sunday 09 February 2003 13:29, Heiko Hamann wrote:
Comparing camera's/lenses based on results of the prints from
(different) labs is .. well ... not so straightforward, I would say.
Of course you are right. I didn't want to make an objective comparison
but to tell you a nice anecdote of my
I continue to be amazed at how many on this list are
unemployed/underemployed, yet are still able to pursue this pastime,
which, let's face it, isn't the cheapest around.
Good luck finding a job, Boris. g
cheers,
frank
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Heiko, you've done a terrible thing. Now I
Hi, Heiko,
I wouldn't discount the photographer being part of the equation. Even with
auto-everything cameras, I wonder if maybe hand-holding with more stability
could account for much of the difference in sharpness you noticed.
regards,
frank
Heiko Hamann wrote:
Hi,
I just want to tell
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Peter Smekal wrote:
I had the same good experience with this combo in various situations. So
much for the 5n Bummer!
Bah, the viewfinder still bites.. :)
--
http://www.infotainment.org - more fun than a poke in your eye.
http://www.eighteenpercent.com-
Well, you can't always get everything you want. I am not a pro in
photography, but I have used Pentax-cameras in my work as anthropologist. I
have for instance used the 5n-combo (lense/flash) when shooting festival
sceneries at night. I was very satisfied with the result. I am not sure if
it had
On Sunday, Feb 9, 2003, at 12:53 Europe/Warsaw, Heiko Hamann wrote:
The experience of success was, that my pictures stick out regarding
best
sharpness, contrast and brilliance. The difference was significant! As
I
had used AF and matrix metering, this success cannot be attibuted to
the
On Sunday, Feb 9, 2003, at 14:05 Europe/Warsaw, Boris Liberman wrote:
Heiko, you've done a terrible thing. Now I want to buy 28-70/4 even
more than ever so that I can replace my Sigma 28-135/3.8-5.6 IF AF
Macro...
Hi Boris,
I don't think you will gain much by switching from this Sigma to
Frits,
I was also thinking of better films. Perhaps theirs were shot on a
poor film for the event. I recently had a friend assist me with a
wedding. He shot a Canon Rebel with Canon zoom (consumer grade), used
one of my AF360FGZ flashes in Auto mode on it and used film that I
provided him. I
--- Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, Feb 9, 2003, at 12:53 Europe/Warsaw,
Heiko Hamann wrote:
The experience of success was, that my pictures
stick out regarding
best
sharpness, contrast and brilliance. The difference
was significant! As
I
had used AF and
Congratulations... to Pentax! :-) Now you have a definite reason NOT
to get the MZ-S...
I think Heiko should do more tests to make sure his MZ-5n was not as good as
he thought then. ;-)
regards,
Alan Chan
_
The new MSN 8:
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Matt Greene wrote:
Kodak Portra 800 excels at indoor flash pictures.
Any idea how it handles skin tones?
chris
I am very satisfied with the skintones of Portra 800.
Chris Brogden wrote:
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Matt Greene wrote:
Kodak Portra 800 excels at indoor flash pictures.
Any idea how it handles skin tones?
chris
21 matches
Mail list logo
