Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://snipurl.com/sccs

Democracy in chains
Greg Palast
June 23, 2006 05:03 PM

Don't kid yourself: the Republican party's decision [last week] to "delay"
the renewal of the Voting Rights Act has not a darn thing to do with
objections of the Republican's white sheets caucus.

Complaints by a couple of good ol' boys to legislation have never stopped
the GOP leadership from rolling over dissenters.

This is a strategic stall that is meant to decriminalise the Republican
party's new game of challenging voters of colour by the hundreds of
thousands.

In the 2004 presidential race, the GOP ran a massive, multi-state,
multimillion-dollar operation to challenge the legitimacy of black,
Hispanic and Native American voters. The methods used breached the Voting
Rights Act, and while the Bush administration's civil rights division
grinned and looked the other way, civil rights lawyers began circling,
preparing to sue to stop the violations of the act before the 2008 race.

So Republicans have promised to no longer break the law - not by going
legit but by eliminating the law.

The act was passed in 1965 after the Ku Klux Klan and other upright
citizens found they could use procedural tricks - "literacy tests", poll
taxes and more - to block citizens of colour from casting ballots.

Here is what happened in 2004, and what's in store for 2008.

In the 2004 election, more than 3 million voters were challenged at the
polls. No one had seen anything like it since the era of Jim Crow and
burning crosses. In 2004, voters were told their registrations had been
purged or that their addresses were "suspect".

Denied the right to the regular voting booths, these challenged voters
were given "provisional" ballots. More than 1m of these provisional
ballots (1,090,729 of them) were tossed in the electoral dumpster
uncounted.

A funny thing about those ballots: about 88% were cast by minority voters.

This isn't a number dropped on me from a black helicopter: they come from
the raw data of the US election assistance commission in Washington DC.

At the heart of the GOP's mass challenge of voters was what the party's
top brass called "caging lists" - secret files of hundreds of thousands of
voters, almost every one from a black-majority voting precinct.

When our investigations team, working for BBC TV, got our hands on these
confidential files in October 2004, the Republicans told us the voters
listed were their potential "donors". Really? The sheets included pages of
men from homeless shelters in Florida.

Donor lists, my ass. Every expert told us, these were "challenge lists"
meant to stop these black voters from casting ballots.

When these "caged" voters arrived at the polls in November 2004, they
found their registrations missing, their right to vote blocked or their
absentee ballots rejected because their addresses were supposedly
"fraudulent".

Why didn't the GOP honchos fess up to challenging these allegedly illegal
voters? Because targeting voters of colour is against the law. The law in
question is the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The act says you can't go after groups of voters if you choose your
targets based on race. Given that almost all the voters on the GOP hit
list are black, the illegal racial profiling is beyond even Karl Rove's
ability to come up with an alibi.

The Republicans target black folk not because they don't like the colour
of their skin; they don't like the colour of their vote: Democrat. For
that reason, the GOP included on its hit list Jewish retirement homes in
Florida. Apparently, the GOP was also gunning for the Elderly of Zion.

These so-called "fraudulent" voters, in fact, were not fraudulent at all.
Page after page, as we have previously reported, are black soldiers sent
overseas. The Bush campaign used their absence from their US homes to
accuse them of voting from false addresses.

Now that the GOP has been caught breaking the voting rights law, it has
found a way to keep using its expensively obtained "caging" lists: let the
law expire next year. If the Voting Rights Act dies in 2007, the 2008 race
will be open season on dark-skinned voters. Only the renewal of the Voting
Rights Act can prevent the planned racial wrecking of democracy.

Before the 2000 presidential ballot, then Jeb Bush purged thousands of
Black citizens' registrations on the grounds that they were "felons" not
entitled to vote. Our review of the files determined that the crime of
most people on the list was nothing more than VWB -- Voting While Black.

That "felon scrub", as the state called it, had to be "pre-cleared" under
the Voting Rights Act. That is, the US justice department must approve
"scrubs" and other changes in procedures.

The Florida felon scrub slipped through this "pre-clearance" provision
because Katherine Harris's assistant assured the government the scrub was
just a clerical matter. Civil rights lawyers are now on the alert for such
mendacity.

The burning cross caucus of the Republican Party is bitching that
"pre-clearance" of voting changes applies only to southern states. I have
to agree that singling out the old confederacy is a bit unfair. But the
solution is not to smother the voting rights law but to spread its
safeguards to all 50 of these United States.

Republicans argue that the racial voting games and the threats of the
white-hooded Klansmen that kept African-Americans from the ballot box
before the 1965 passage of the Voting Rights Act no longer threaten black
voters.

That's true. When I look over the "caging lists" and the "scrub sheets",
it's clear to me that the GOP has traded in white sheets for spreadsheets.

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or you 
can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will become disabled or deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to