NPR Gives 2 Minutes to WorldWide Protests, and 10 Minutes to Queen's Pants

While Pacifica radio devoted the entire day to coverage of the antiwar protests 
in DC and SF, "listener-supported" NPR spent exactly 2 minutes of its evening 
news coverage on the story. What did they cover instead? 10 minutes of idle 
transatlantic chitchat with a British journalist about the Queen's shocking 
public appearance in slacks following knee surgery.  Send your complaints to  
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and tell them you'll remember at pitch time.

http://discover.npr.org/rundowns/rundown.jhtml?prgDate=01/18/2003&prgId=2

------------------

A Stirring in the Nation
January 20, 2003
NY Times

A largely missing ingredient in the nascent debate about invading Iraq showed 
up on the streets of major cities over the weekend as crowds of peaceable 
protesters marched in a demand to be heard. They represented what appears to be 
a large segment of the American public that remains unconvinced that the Iraqi 
threat warrants the use of military force at this juncture. 

Denouncing the war plan as an administration idée fixe that will undermine
America's standing in the world, stir unrest in the Mideast and damage the
American economy, the protesters in Washington massed on Saturday for what
police described as the largest antiwar rally at the Capitol since the Vietnam
era. It was impressive for the obvious mainstream roots of the marchers - from
young college students to grayheads with vivid protest memories of the 60's.
They gathered from near and far by the tens of thousands, galvanized by the
possibility that President Bush will soon order American forces to attack Iraq
even without the approval of the United Nations Security Council. 

Mr. Bush and his war cabinet would be wise to see the demonstrators as a clear
sign that noticeable numbers of Americans no longer feel obliged to salute the
administration's plans because of the shock of Sept. 11 and that many harbor
serious doubts about his march toward war. The protesters are raising some
nuanced questions in the name of patriotism about the premises, cost and
aftermath of the war the president is contemplating. Millions of Americans who
did not march share the concerns and have yet to hear Mr. Bush make a
persuasive case that combat operations are the only way to respond to Saddam
Hussein. 

Other protests will be emphasizing civil disobedience in the name of Martin
Luther King Jr. But any graphic moments to come of confrontation and arrest
should be seen in the far broader context of the Capitol scene: peaceable
throngs of mainstream Americans came forward demanding more of a dialogue from
political leaders. Mr. Bush and his aides, to their credit, welcomed the
demonstrations as a healthy manifestation of American democracy at work. We
hope that spirit will endure in the weeks ahead if differences deepen and a
noisier antiwar movement develops. These protests are the tip of a far broader
sense of concern and lack of confidence in the path to war that seems to lie
ahead.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/20/opinion/20MON2.html?ex=1044066790&ei=1&en=
91842cd540162e62

------------------

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12152-2003Jan18.html

Thousands Oppose a Rush to War 
Chill Doesn't Cool Fury Over U.S. Stand on Iraq 

By Manny Fernandez and Justin Blum
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, January 19, 2003; Page A01 

Tens of thousands of antiwar demonstrators converged on Washington
yesterday, making a thunderous presence in the bitter cold and assembling
in the shadow of the Capitol dome to oppose a U.S. military strike against
Iraq.

Throughout a morning rally on the Mall and an afternoon march to the
Washington Navy Yard in Southeast, activists criticized the Bush
administration for rushing into a war that they claimed would kill
thousands of Iraqi civilians, spell disaster for the national economy and
set a dangerous and unjustified first-strike precedent for U.S. foreign
policy.

They delivered that message on a day when being outdoors tested everyone's
endurance. Men, women and children fought off temperatures no higher than
24 degrees in ski masks and goggles, stashes of hot soup in containers in
their backpacks. Many sneaked away momentarily to warm up on an idling bus
or to grab a cup of coffee.

"The world is cold, but our hearts are warm," Jesse Jackson told the crowd
to applause. He was one of many speakers, who included civil rights leader
Al Sharpton from New York, actress Jessica Lange and Rep. John Conyers
Jr. (D-Mich.).

Organizers of the demonstration, the activist coalition International
ANSWER (Act Now to Stop War and End Racism), said the protest was larger
than one they sponsored in Washington in October. District police
officials suggested then that about 100,000 attended, and although some
organizers agreed, they have since put the number closer to 200,000. This
time, they said, the turnout was 500,000. Police Chief Charles H. Ramsey
would not provide an estimate but said it was bigger than October's. "It's
one of the biggest ones we've had, certainly in recent times," he said.

Local and federal police presence was light, and Ramsey said there were
only a couple of minor incidents. A U.S. Capitol Police spokeswoman
reported two arrests, one for disorderly conduct and one for writing
graffiti on a Library of Congress building.

D.C. Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department officials said three
people were taken to hospitals, including a woman who had a seizure. The
health problems were not believed serious and were not weather-related,
officials said.

Thousands attended similar rallies in cities including San Francisco and
Tampa as well as in other countries. Organizers selected yesterday for
protests partly because of the approaching Jan. 27 deadline for the first
major report by weapons inspectors in Iraq, a date many activists said
could trigger war. The events were also meant to mark the Martin Luther
King Jr. holiday, and many speakers invoked his legacy.

Regardless of the exact number, the crowd yesterday on the Mall was the
largest antiwar demonstration here since the Vietnam era. For the 11
a.m. rally, much of four long blocks of the Mall was packed,
shoulder-to-shoulder in many sections from Third to Seventh streets SW
between Madison and Jefferson drives. The first marchers stepped off about
1:30 p.m., and when many had begun reaching the Navy Yard more than two
dozen blocks away about an hour later, others were still leaving the rally
site.

Those who hoped that President Bush and much of Congress would witness the
thousands in the streets of Washington were out of luck; the president was
at Camp David, and most members of Congress were away for the weekend.

It hardly mattered to some. Marchers spoke of a surging grass-roots
political power.

"The antiwar movement is now at a whole new level," said Tony Murphy, a
spokesman for International ANSWER, which was formed three days after the
Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks as a response to the Bush
administration's war on terrorism at home and abroad. "Now we're talking
about a force that can really stop the war. It's not just a hopeful
attitude. It's a real sense that it's possible," he said.

The demonstration drew people of all walks of life, from both coasts and
all points in between, as scores of college students, 30-something
families and senior citizens traveled to Washington by charter bus, car
caravan, plane, train and -- in the case of one determined Iowa State
University student -- foot.

On the snow-covered grass of the Mall and in the narrow streets along the
march through Southeast Washington, handwritten signs and banners bobbed,
distilling the day: "War is not a Christian belief," "No blood for
oil," "Freezing out here for peace."

"We want peace," said Mari Anderson, 59, of Titusville, Fla., a chemical
specialist at a power plant who drove 14 hours to Washington with a friend
and walked along Pennsylvania Avenue NW yesterday morning to join the
throngs rallying on the Mall. "We want diplomatic solutions. Saddam
Hussein hasn't done anything to us in 11 years."

Alex Maertens, 30, of Southeast Washington, made time in her day to join
the protest. "I don't like having to march with people who are sentimental
fools, but I happen to think that this war is an immense mistake," said
Maertens, a toxicologist studying at Johns Hopkins University. "The burden
of proof is on us, and that case has not been established."

Marching with a packed crowd along Independence Avenue SE was Nancy Paton,
49, who came to Washington with her 23-year-old daughter on one of four
busloads from her Westland, Mich., interfaith church. Paton said she had
never been part of a political protest before. "I kind of felt powerless
to do anything about this proposed war on Iraq," she said, adding that she
was moved to join the protest because the war "is more about oil than
terrorism. After this war in Afghanistan, it seems like Bush just wants to
keep going."

Through the day, the debate over whether the United States should use
military force against Hussein spilled onto the sidewalks and street
corners of the city's center and outside the gates of the Navy
Yard. Counter-protesters, some organized and others not, offered their
opinion of the antiwar activists.

"You guys should go get a job," said a man traveling in a black sport
utility vehicle that pulled over briefly to heckle protesters on
Pennsylvania Avenue NW. Later in the day, on the Pennsylvania Avenue SE
march route, a group of people sharing a bottle of champagne on a
second-floor balcony displayed a sign reading, "Hippies Go
Home." Protesters responded, "We are home."

When the march approached Eighth and I streets SE outside the U.S. Marine
Corps barracks, about 50 counter-protesters -- including veterans --
continued their rally, chanting "Swim to Cuba" and "We gave peace a
chance; We got 9/11." In return, the protesters shouted, "We don't want
your oil war." The march stopped for 10 minutes, and Ramsey walked up and
down the lines of officers separating the marchers and the
counter-protesters.

Exchanges proved far more civil elsewhere.

On a Blue Line Metro train headed for the Mall, one goateed, middle-aged
man loudly lectured other protesters -- and everyone else within earshot
-- about the history of Iraq and how the United States was complicit in
every development there in the past 50 years. Some fellow riders listened
intently and thanked him as he left the train at Smithsonian Station.

Activists cited a number of reasons why -- in the middle of a numbingly
cold Washington winter, for a $35 to $110 seat on a packed bus spending
anywhere from a couple to more than 24 hours on the road -- they came to
the capital. Some said they were pacifists opposed to war no matter the
circumstance. Others said they were moved to action because they felt the
Bush administration was rushing into an unjustified war with Iraq and that
they viewed the march as a kind of election in which to cast a vote
through their presence.

"I am here to tell people who might have questions about the war that
they're not alone," said Brian Harrison, 21, a Texas college student who
took a 27-hour, charter-bus ride from Houston to join the
demonstration. "So many people are so riled up about the war that they're
willing to travel great distances to physically testify their opposition."

The cold, though, was never far from the minds of the protesters,
including Harrison, who said he had never seen snow on the ground. "I've
actually never been this cold before," he said.

But Shelby Berkowitz, 32, a graduate student in psychology from Lansing,
Mich., asked, "What's the suffering from standing out in the cold compared
to the suffering inflicted by U.S. policies in the world?"

Antiwar demonstrations are scheduled to continue today in
Washington. Youths and students who took part in yesterday's march plan
their own demonstration, with an 11 a.m. rally and march from the
Department of Justice to the White House.

Civil disobedience is planned at the White House by D.C. Iraq Pledge of
Resistance and United for Peace. After an 11:30 a.m. rally at Farragut
Square, hundreds will risk arrest to show their opposition to war,
organizers said.

At the end of yesterday's march about 5 p.m., protesters said they were
pleased and hoped that the Bush administration would hear their
message. "It turned out very well despite the weather," said Jon Mays, 32,
an engineer from Clinton. "It made me proud that we have people that are
coming together for one cause."


Staff writers David A. Fahrenthold, Avram Goldstein, Hamil R. Harris,
Chris L. Jenkins, Carol Morello and Monte Reel and the Associated Press
contributed to this report.

Reply via email to