Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=425&row=0

TONY BLAIR CAN'T WIN
Wednesday, May 4, 2005

A British reporter from America explains why Britons will vote for a guy
named 'Brown' - so Blair can't lose

By Greg Palast

Mark my words: Tony Blair won't be re-elected Thursday. However, he will
remain in office.

That's because Brits don't vote for their Prime Minister. They've got a
"parliamentary" system there in the Mother Country. And the difference
between democracy and parliamentary rule makes all the difference. It is
the only reason why Blair will keep his job -- at least for a few months.

Let me explain. The British vote only for their local Member of
Parliament. The MPs, in turn, pick the PM. If a carpenter in Nottingham
doesn't like Prime Minister Blair (not all dislike him, some detest him),
the only darn thing they can do about it is vote against their local MP,
in this case, the lovely Alan Simpson, a Labour Party stalwart who himself
would rather kiss a toad than cuddle with Tony.

Therefore, the majority of the Queen's subjects -- deathly afraid of the
return of Margaret Thatcher's vampirical Tory spawn -- holds their noses,
vote for their local Labour MP and pray that an act of God will save their
happy isle. A recent poll showed the British evenly divided: forty percent
want Blair to encounter a speeding double-decker bus and forty percent
want him stretched, scalded and quartered in the Tower of London (within a
sampling margin of four percent).

Why? Well, to begin with, Blair lies. A secret memo from inside Blair's
coven discovered this week made clear that Britain's Prime Minister knew
damn well, eight months before we invaded Iraq, that George Bush was
cooking the intelligence info on "WDM," but Blair agreed to tag along with
his master.

The Prime Minister's coterie sold his nation on the re-conquest of their
old colony, Iraq, by making up this cockamamie story about Saddam Hussein
having weapons of mass destruction that could take out London in 45
minutes. But Brits knew that was 'bollocks' (no translation available)
long before this week's shock-horror memo story.

A greater blight on the Prime Minister's reputation: Blair likes American
presidents. While his habit of keeping his nose snug against Bill
Clinton's derriere was a bit off-putting, his application to George Bush's
behind makes Blair's countrymen retch.

I watched the machinery called Tony Blair up close as a Yankee in King
Blair's court (first as an advisor on the inside, then as a journalist
also on the inside, but with a hidden tape recorder).

And it was eerie. Because what I saw was a man who, while Britain's
erstwhile leader, scorns his own country. That is, he scorns the union
workers that wanted to keep filthy coal mines open; he scorns the
nostalgic blue-haired ladies who wanted to keep the Queen's snout on their
nation's currency; he scorns his nation of maddeningly inefficient little
shops on the high street, of subjects snoozy with welfare state comforts
and fearful of the wonders of cheap labor available in far-off locales.

Blair looks longingly at America, land of the hard-charging capitalist
cowboy, of entrepreneurs with big-box retail discount stores, Silicon
Valley start-ups and Asian out-sourcing.

Blair doesn't want to be Prime Minister. He wants to be governor in London
of America's 51st state.

Britons know this. They feel deeply that their main man doesn't like the
Britain he has. And that is why the average punter in the pub longs to be
led by that most English of British politicians -- who is not English at
all -- Gordon Brown, the Scotland-born Chancellor of the Exchequer.

And so they vote for their local Labour MP on that party's quietly
whispered promise that, shortly after the election, Gordon Brown, defender
of the old welfare state, union rights, and a gentleman unlikely to invade
forgotten remnants of the empire, will, on a vote of his parliamentary
confreres, take the reins of government in his benign and prudent hands.

As New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman says, Tony Blair is a man of
principle. So was the Ayatolla Khomeini. Both were willing to have others
pay any price for their beliefs.

Luckily for Britain, Chancellor Brown won't let Blair put his fanatic
hands on the kingdom's cash or coinage. And herein is another difference
betwixt the US and UK. In America, the Treasury Secretary is little more
than the President's factotum. In Britain, the Chancellor holds the
nation's purse. Brown brilliantly controls Britain's spending, taxing and
currency. For example, despite Tony's pleas, Brown presciently nixed
England dumping the pound coin for the euro.

And thus Brown, not Blair, has earned his nation's gratitude for the
island's steady recovery from Thatcherite punishments while, across The
Pond, real wages in Bush's America are falling.

Blair will hold onto office - for now - due only to a sly campaign that
relies on the public's accepting on faith that, sooner rather than later
after the vote on Thursday, Blair will do the honorable thing and end his
own political life, leaving the British-to-the-bone Brown to inherit the
parliamentary throne. Tony's political corpse can then be mailed to Texas
- wrapped in an American flag.


Greg Palast, former columnist for Britain's Guardian papers, is the author
of the New York Times bestseller, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy.
Subscribe to his columns at http://www.GregPalast.com

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
or you can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will be deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to