Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

RETURN OF THE FALLEN:
Pentagon Releases Hundreds More War Casualty Homecoming Images

National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 152, April 28, 2005
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB152/index.htm

Washington, D.C., April 28, 2005 - In response to Freedom of Information
Act requests and a lawsuit, the Pentagon this week released hundreds of
previously secret images of casualties returning to honor guard ceremonies
from the Afghanistan and Iraq wars and other conflicts, confirming that
images of their flag-draped coffins are rightfully part of the public
record, despite its earlier insistence that such images should be kept
secret.

One year after the start of a series of Freedom of Information Act
requests filed by University of Delaware Professor Ralph Begleiter with
the assistance of the National Security Archive, and six months after a
lawsuit charging the Pentagon with failing to comply with the Act, the
Pentagon made public more than 700 images of the return of American
casualties to Dover Air Force Base and other U.S. military facilities,
where the fallen troops received honor guard ceremonies. The Pentagon
officially refers to the photos as "images of the memorial and arrival
ceremonies for deceased military personnel arriving from overseas." Many
of the images show evidence of censorship, which the Pentagon says is
intended to conceal identifiable personal information of military
personnel involved in the homecoming ceremonies.

Begleiter's lawsuit is supported by the National Security Archive and the
Washington, D.C. office of the law firm Jenner & Block. "This is an
important victory for the American people, for the families of troops
killed in the line of duty during wartime, and for the honor of those who
have made the ultimate sacrifice for their country," said Begleiter, a
former CNN Washington correspondent who teaches journalism and political
science at the University of Delaware. "This significant decision by the
Pentagon should make it difficult, if not impossible, for any U.S.
government in the future to hide the human cost of war from the American
people."

The Pentagon's decision preempted a court ruling in the lawsuit by U.S.
District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan. "We are gratified that these important
public records were released without the need for further court action,"
said Daniel Mach of Jenner & Block. The Pentagon ban on media coverage of
returning war casualties was initiated in January 1991 by then Secretary
of Defense Dick Cheney during the administration of President George H. W.
Bush, just weeks before the start of the Gulf War against Iraq.

"I have never considered the release of images as a political issue," said
Begleiter, noting that both Republican and Democratic administrations
imposed the image ban. "But, seeing the cost of war, like any
highly-charged political issue, can have strong political consequences."

Begleiter's Freedom of Information Act requests, and the lawsuit, asked
for release of both still and video images. The Pentagon's "final
response" in the case includes no video images of the honor ceremonies for
returning war casualties. "I'm surprised at this," said Begleiter,
"because the U.S. military uses video and film technology extensively in
its public relations efforts."

Thomas Blanton, Director of the National Security Archive, which actively
uses the Freedom of Information Act to force release of government
documents, said, "The government now admits it was wrong to keep these
images secret. Hiding the cost of war doesn't make that cost any less.
Banning the photos keeps flag-draped coffins off the evening news, but it
fundamentally disrespects those who have made the ultimate sacrifice."

Blanton and Begleiter noted one major negative consequence of the dispute
over the images: the Pentagon appears to have stopped creating the photos
in the first place. All the released images containing date information
appear to have been taken prior to June 2004. Military officials told
Begleiter and the news media that such photos were no longer being taken
since his first Freedom of Information Act request was filed in April
2004.

Begleiter said, "Hiding these images from the public - or, worse, failing
even to record these respectful moments - deprives all Americans of the
opportunity to recognize their contribution to our democracy, and hinders
policymakers and historians in the future from making informed judgments
about public opinion and war." He called on the Pentagon to resume fully
documenting the return of American casualties.

Although some of the newly released images include dates, locations and
other information, the Pentagon censored that information from most of the
released images. Some of the censorship, or, as the Pentagon prefers to
call it, "redaction," blacks out faces, identifying features on equipment,
and uniform styles. In one case, for example, a clergyman's identity is
censored, while in another image, a different clergyman remains
unredacted.

"I cannot imagine that the members of these honor guards want their own
faces blacked out from the public homage that is due," Blanton said.
"Honor guard is the most solemn duty for anybody in the military, not
something for the censors to hide."

The photos released by the Pentagon were taken by U.S. government
photographers, not by journalists. "There is nothing macabre or ghoulish
about these images," said Begleiter. "These are among the most respectful
images created of American casualties of war - far less wrenching than
images we regularly see from the battlefield. They're taken under
carefully controlled circumstances by military photographers covering
honor ceremonies."

An initial release of 361 such images was provided by the Pentagon in
April, 2004 in response to a Freedom of Information Act appeal by Russ
Kick, who maintains the web site thememoryhole.org. The Pentagon later
declared that release to have been a mistake and refused to release
further images, which prompted Begleiter and the National Security Archive
to challenge the policy.

The Freedom of Information Act case was filed in Federal District Court
for the District of Columbia [Case No. 1:04-cv-01697 (EGS)].

The newly released images, along with many other details of the Freedom of
Information Act case, may be seen at: http://www.nsarchive.org.

------------------------------

Historical note:

The ban on media coverage of returning casualties was imposed by Defense
Secretary Cheney after an embarrassing incident in which three television
networks broadcast live, split-screen images in December, 1989, as the
first U.S. casualties were returning from an American assault on Panama.
In that incident, President Bush was seen on television joking at a White
House news conference while somber images of flag-draped coffins arriving
at Dover Air Force Base moved across viewers' screens. The ban on war
casualty images was continued during the Clinton administration, which
made several exceptions to allow publication and broadcast upon the return
of victims of attacks against U.S. personnel abroad, including the bombing
of the U.S.S. Cole in 2000. President George W. Bush continued the ban
following the start of the Afghanistan war in October, 2001 and the Iraq
invasion in March, 2003.

Former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Henry Shelton, coined
the phrase "the Dover Test" to describe the impact of images of
flag-draped coffins returning from a battlefield to the military mortuary
at Dover, potentially affecting public support for a war. Images of
casualties have played significant roles in many previous conflicts,
beginning with the Civil War in the 1860's and continuing through World
Wars I and II and the Vietnam conflict in the 1960's. In 1991, President
Bush asserted that the U.S. had "kicked the Vietnam syndrome once and for
all," but later in the 1990's, deployments of U.S. troops in Somalia,
Bosnia and Kosovo were influenced by memories of the images of Vietnam-era
casualties.

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
or you can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will be deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to