Info about subscribing or unsubscribing from this list is at the bottom of this 
message.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

in other news:

http://www.ifilm.com/ifilmdetail/2663486?htv=12

A Fox News anchor flips out when a guest dares to question the nature of
Bush's elaborate 2nd inauguration.

------------

http://snipurl.com/cdqs

What Iraqis Think of the Elections
Islam Online
Dahr Jamail
January 25, 2005

While elections in Iraq appear to be on track, opinions among Iraqis vary
on topics ranging from whether they will even vote to whether the polls
will bring positive change for their war-torn occupied country.

Ordinary Iraqis are concerned about the fairness of the elections, which
is threatened by the bad security situation as well as the complexities
within the very election system.

“We are not against the elections, but we are against their timing,” said
Saif, an 18-year-old biology student at Baghdad University. “They will be
a disaster. Look at the security!”

In the lead-up to the elections, violence continues to escalate, the
target of which oftentimes being polling stations and political officials.

In Beji on January 17, two polling stations were attacked with mortars and
gunfire. Also in the same area, fighters attacked a school that was
designated as a polling station and was being guarded by US soldiers.

More, a suicide car bomb detonated near the offices of the headquarters of
one of the leading Shiite political parties, killing at least four guards.
The office of The Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq,
located near Baghdad University in south Baghdad, was damaged in the
explosion.

Despite the violence, many Iraqis remain determined to vote.

“We are not against elections, but we are against their timing.”

“I will vote no matter what,” said Alia Khalaf, a biologist in Baghdad who
is also a follower of Sistani. “The elections will bring more security to
Iraq.”

Yet it seems difficult to imagine that simply holding elections will be a
catalyst for stability.

Recently, in another military operation, the son of an official close to
the revered cleric Grand Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani was shot dead in
southeast Baghdad. Furthermore, last week Mahmoud Al-Madaen, the personal
representative of Sistani in the small city of Salman Pak south of
Baghdad, was assassinated along with his son and four bodyguards. On the
same day Halim Al-Moaqaq was found dead. Moaqaq was another of Sistani’s
aides.

At least eight candidates have been assassinated—let alone countless
thwarted attempts.

Many Iraqis hold very strong opinions against holding the elections under
these circumstances.

“We will have the elections only because the Americans demand it,” said
Sara, a physics student in Baghdad. “The people nominated are not national
Iraqis and most of them are puppets of the Americans who have not suffered
in Iraq like we have under these circumstances.”

“I will vote no matter what.”

In seemingly futile efforts to increase security for the elections, the
US-backed interim Iraqi government has announced that the country’s
borders will be closed from January 29 until January 31. Mobile and
satellite phones will be cut during this time, the use of vehicles
“restricted,” and already existing nighttime curfews extended. Iraqis will
also be barred from traveling between the governorates.


Election Complexities

“If there are to be true elections there should be names,” complained a
man who called himself Ahmed in a market in central Baghdad.

His opinion is not without cause—the election process is fraught with
complexities. Even the ballot itself for the 275-member parliament is
difficult to discern. There are over 7,000 candidates, mostly unnamed for
fear of assassination. Members of parliament will be elected by
proportional representation.

To further complicate matters, it appears that there are four of Iraq’s 18
governorates that will be unable to participate in the elections because
of the widespread violence.


A Sunni-Shiite “Divide”?

Some Iraqis who intend to vote are frustrated with the media attention
focusing on the Sunni-Shiite “divide.”

“We will have the elections only because the Americans demand it.”

Responding to the question as to his religious sect, Ahmed would not say
whether he was Shiite or Sunni: “Why should it matter? We are all Iraqi
and we are all Muslim.”

Jassim—a 36-year-old grocery store owner in the predominantly Shiite
district of Khadimiya—believes that “there is no reason for a Sunni-Shiite
split.”

“It is only the political parties that are using this talk,” he added,
“And it seems as though there are those who would like to cause a divide.
But it will never happen, because we have never had this divide.”


Which Comes First: Democracy or Elections?

If the elections take place and a parliament is formed, its job will be to
produce a constitution, which will then be held to a referendum prior to
October 15 later this year. Shortly after that—on December 15—elections
will be held in order to choose a new government, according to the Iraqi
transitional law.

These plans seem far-fetched when looking through the lens of violence and
turmoil that is Occupied Iraq today.

“Shouldn’t democracy precede elections,” exclaimed an unemployed engineer
named Khalid in central Baghdad, “rather than trying to use these
illegitimate elections to call Iraq a democracy?”

Summing up the political situation afflicting the upcoming elections, a
veteran Iraqi politician who spoke on condition of anonymity told Al-Ahram
Weekly newspaper, “It is clear that Sunni deputies will be appointed, now
that the Islamic party has withdrawn and the Association of Muslim
Scholars is boycotting the elections.”

Further underscoring the chaos amidst the elections and their potential
political fallout, he continued, “I don't believe that the Americans are
going to agree to the Kurdish demands concerning Kirkuk and one of the two
top government posts. Nor are the Americans going to agree to the Shiite
request for federalism and a majority in the National Assembly, nor to an
Iranian-style regime.”

Another politician, speaking also to Al-Ahram Weekly on condition of
anonymity, asked, “What type of constitution are we to expect from
elections that are held under occupation and right after the bloodshed in
Falluja?”

_____________________________

Note: This message comes from the peace-justice-news e-mail mailing list of 
articles and commentaries about peace and social justice issues, activism, etc. 
 If you do not regularly receive mailings from this list or have received this 
message as a forward from someone else and would like to be added to the list, 
send a blank e-mail with the subject "subscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
or you can visit:
http://lists.enabled.com/mailman/listinfo/peace-justice-news  Go to that same 
web address to view the list's archives or to unsubscribe.

E-mail accounts that become full, inactive or out of order for more than a few 
days will be deleted from this list.

FAIR USE NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the 
information in this e-mail is distributed without profit to those who have 
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational 
purposes.  I am making such material available in an effort to advance 
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, 
scientific, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair 
use' of copyrighted material as provided for in the US Copyright Law.

Reply via email to