Joe, list,
Thank you for your recollections of Morgenbesser.
He sounds so New York Jewish!
To B.F. Skinner, Let me see if I understand your thesis. You think we
shouldn't anthropomorphize people?
Yes, I've come to think that the NYT claim sounds ridiculous (I didn't know
what to think back
offlist--
Joe wrote:
the superior intelligence of the street-wise New Yorker in
comparison with the well-protected genteel intelligence of the Cambridge
academicians.
Hey, who are you talkin' about? Are you talking about me???!
Ben, all of your posts of late have been of the
List,
Sorry, that was to have gone directly to Ben's mailbox. Still, those of
you who know that Ben and I live in New York may have gotten my inside
joke.
Gary
Gary Richmond wrote:
offlist--
Joe wrote:
the superior intelligence of the street-wise New Yorker in comparison
with the
Joe, list,
I do want to belatedly comment on this provocative post. The dependency of
the symbol on the interpretant is, it seems to me, rather strictly limited.
While symbols are arbitrary in some sense, Peirce does not contemplate a
free play of semiotic exchange, limited only by, as Rorty
