]To: Peirce Discussion Forum peirce-l@lyris.ttu.eduSent: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 15:20:42 -0500Subject: [peirce-l] Re: Peircean elements
Claudio, list,
It's fine with me if you or others modify my graphics for the purposes of discussion, and you seem good at the graphics.
The discussion has advanced
Jim, list,
Jim wrote:
Ben,I have a question. What is the relation between cognition and
recognition? It seems that 3a and 3b respond to two different questions, namely,
what is a correct logical description of the structure of cognition and how is
that structure *validated* for any given
Claudio, list,
It's fine with me if you or others modify my graphics for the purposes of
discussion, and you seem good at the graphics.
The discussion has advanced considerably beyond the point which you seem to
have reached. You seem to have isolated a few of my remarks and addressed them
Thomas,
I am very curious about what you come up with for sure! Of course.
But, another thing...I am wondering what you are doing for a living
actually? Being a cook, cooking for people in a restaurant?? And that is
(about) fulltime?
I myself am actually working in a backery right now for
PROTECTED]
To: Peirce Discussion Forum peirce-l@lyris.ttu.edu
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 7:14 AM
Subject: [peirce-l] Re: Peircean elements
What concerns general transitivity:
Perhaps one might say: Otherness is an Icon of Thirdness.
I'd better stop this now.
Ciao, Ben.
Thomas.
---
Message from
