From raypg Mon May 8 13:33:29 1995
Return-Path: raypg
Date: Mon, 08 May 1995 13:43:18 wdt
From: raypg@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (glenn rayp)
content-length: 2453
Paul
I also think this is a key question.
Perhaps we would be better to view globalisation not as a brute fact,
but as an
PROGRAM PATTERNS SOCIETAL EVOLUTION
Researchers at the Brookings Institution have developed a computer program
that generates artificial societies and tracks how they evolve over time.
The Computerrarium program uses a "bottom up" approach, in which elaborate
structures emerge from the collective
Paul Cockshott argues for national controls on international capital based
on the current political backwardness of the US etc relative to Europe.
It would seem that a more straightforward approach would be to
increase political awareness in the US of the need for international
In a post on Friday, Mike Meeropol wrote that:
Result: the very basis on which the system was "held together" between 1945
and,say, 1989 is now GONE. The sluggishness of the recovery and the need to
maintain unemployment so much higher than in the past and the persistence of
the INCREASE in
To Bill Mitchell:
The ecology-based-anti-meat-food-shortage
argument is only relevant for grain-fed meat.
Does not apply to range fed (OZZIE mutton?),
especially if fed on land that will not grow grain
and is not wrecked by the feeding activity.
Of course there are more spiritual
Please forward to anyone who might be interested.
Date: Mon, 8 May 95 08:48:19 CDT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Laura Kurre)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: job announcement
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Position Available - Executive Director
Community-based, social justice org promoting changes in
Question: is Marx's notion of "real subsumption" too vague to be
useful, or can it stand on its own [with possible emendation]?
Jim O'Connor writes:
Marx's original sense of
"real subsumption" is too vague, and also wrong. If you
include "mode of cooperation" as part of the "labor process,"
awhile back, I sent the following message, which seems to have
been lost in cyberspace:
On Wed, 3 May 1995 14:55:23 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I can't imagine that the notion of adjusting rates of return for
"systemic differences in risk" sits comfortably within Marxian
economics. To begin
Peter Burns
---
I'm all for class struggle--but violence must be confined to
self-defense in extreme, last resort situations. Things are
bad and getting worse, but I think there's still some way
to go before we get to that point in Europe, North America,
or even OZ.
Paul
If you
On Mon, 8 May 1995, Paul Cockshott wrote:
Through the
use of terror tactics in Germany they have suceeded in shifting
the political spectrum there decisively to the right. For instance
it is now politically dangerous for Kohl to come out and say
that VE day was a day of liberation for
Alan Freeman says:
I tend to think his [Marx's]actual view on this was governed by empirical fact.
On p860 (CIII L/W) he writes
"The market-prices rise above and fall below these regulating
prices of production, but these fluctuations mutually balance each
other. If one examines price lists
Could you provide some reference from *Capital* Paul? As I understand,
Marx did
not write *Law of Chaos*.
Cheers, ajit sinha
Paul:
However a quote from marx:
We have thus demonstrated that different lines of industry have
different rates of profit, which correspond to differences in
the
Does anyone out there know if any cross-country studies
have been made of the correlations or lack of them between
levels of real wages and benefits at PPP, and levels
of unemployment? I doubt if there is a correlation, but
has anything of interest been observed in this matter--
we hear so
13 matches
Mail list logo
