Hi Trond!
Am I mistaken in thinking that the EEA gives Norwegians the right to work
anywhere in the EEA, which the FTA did not?
Regards,
Rick
The parliamentary majority/gvt. was/is so eager to get us in (to the EEA)
that they sold out/sell out for nothing in return!
Rick Wicks replies to me, on Tue, 16 Apr 1996:
Am I mistaken in thinking that the EEA gives Norwegians the right to work
anywhere in the EEA, which the FTA did not?
There are two points to make in reply to this:
1) Yes, it does, and the FTA didn't. At the same time the EEA also
gives EU
There was a very interesting article in the New York Review of Books,
29 Feb, p47-52, "The New, Ruthless Economy", by Simon Head. It gave
considerable detail on how earnings of non-supervisory workers in the
U.S. have fallen while productivity has risen, relating that to "lean
production",
BLS DAILY REPORT, MONDAY, APRIL 15, 1996
_Sharply rising energy and food costs helped push up consumer prices a
seasonally adjusted 0.4 percent in March, BLS reports. Many analysts had
expected a smaller increase in the CPI. They also believed the core rate --
excluding volatile food
I apologize for any duplicate postings.
---
The bombardment of Lebanon continued on Sunday. The
Israelis are using the Nazi logic that the Hizbollah is threatening
Northern Israel, therefore there should be collective
I made a slip of the brain in my initial message on this issue: The
transition from the FTA to the EEA in the case of Norway took place on
January 1. 1994 - not 1993. Sorry!
Trond Andresen
TRUTH-AZAPO
DURBAN April 10 1996 Sapa
TRUTH COMMISSION IS TRYING TO APPEASE AGGRESSORS: AZAPO
Azanian Peoples' Organisation KwaZulu-Natal chairman Patrick Mkhize on
Wednesday branded the Truth and Reconciliation Commission as nothing more
than a platform to whitewash those who had
The other day, I asked loyal Keynesians to comment on Morck, Shleifer, and
Vishny's 1990 paper showing the stock market to have little effect on
investment - a very damaging empirical refutation of JMK's line on the
malign influence of sentiment on the real world.
That was my second try in the
On Tue, 16 Apr 1996, Doug Henwood wrote:
The other day, I asked loyal Keynesians to comment on Morck, Shleifer, and
Vishny's 1990 paper showing the stock market to have little effect on
investment - a very damaging empirical refutation of JMK's line on the
malign influence of sentiment on
The Brecht Forum
The New York Marxist School
122 West 27 Street, 10 floor
New York, New York 10001
(212) 242-4201
(212) 741-4563 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (e-mail)
Beyond the 1996 Elections: Marxist Prospects
The New York Marxist School's
Eighteenth Annual Summer Intensive Study of Marxism
The other day, I asked loyal Keynesians to comment on Morck, Shleifer, and
Vishny's 1990 paper showing the stock market to have little effect on
investment - a very damaging empirical refutation of JMK's line on the
malign influence of sentiment on the real world.
Let me add a couple of
At 1:19 PM 4/16/96, Christopher Niggle wrote:
Doug: I've not seen the paper you refer to - I'd like to, may I have the
citation? -
Ronald Morck, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny, "The Stock Market and
Invesetment: Is the Market a Sideshow," Brookings Papers on Economic
Activity 2 (1990), pp.
To Doug H.
Even if Mork, et al are correct it does not necessarily
undo the broader JMK story, even if his precise remarks about
the stock market may be undermined.
The broader story is that the state of "long-term expectation"
or animal spirits drives investment. That also shows up in
At 12:37 PM 4/16/96, Doug Henwood wrote:
The other day, I asked loyal Keynesians to comment on Morck, Shleifer, and
Vishny's 1990 paper showing the stock market to have little effect on
investment - a very damaging empirical refutation of JMK's line on the
malign influence of sentiment on the
I haven't read Mork from Ork, et al's paper but it makes sense to
me that one could reject the causation of stock-market events --
real investment. But, as Chris N. says, doesn't mean that Keynes
was wrong. Didn't Keynes say that speculative bubbles could pop
without having any effect if the
Hey folks, thought some of you might be interested in this. Disclaimer: Tom
is friend and colleague.
Blair Sandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a blurb for my book. You might be interested. On
the other hand, you might not be. But please don't get too
irritated at
Oh my, I wasnt' going to jump in on this but
1. Att is the ONLY unionized long distance carrier in the USA. WALD is not
unionized. Those who don't think this matters should try working for both --
there is a difference.
2. A friend of mine invested her small nest egg in Working
17 matches
Mail list logo