hit the economy: bin Laden

2001-12-28 Thread Chris Burford
It is important to hit the economy (of the United States), which is the base of its military power... http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/middle_east/newsid_1729000/1729882.stm It is not clear from the URL above which the BBC says is a transcript of bin Laden's latest tape why there are

the profit rate recession

2001-12-28 Thread Devine, James
Concerning my notes that I posted on-line (at http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/faculty/jdevine/FROP/sacramento.htm), Rakesh writes: 1. you have confused changes in vcc with changes in occ. I wrote: I don't care, since what's important is the change in K/Y (the fixed capital-output ratio). It's

Re: the profit rate recession

2001-12-28 Thread Devine, James
Concerning my notes that I posted on-line (at http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/faculty/jdevine/FROP/sacramento.htm), Rakesh writes: 1. you have confused changes in vcc with changes in occ. I wrote: I don't care, since what's important is the change in K/Y (the fixed capital-output ratio). It's

Re: Re: Enron's Success Story

2001-12-28 Thread William S. Lear
On Wednesday, December 26, 2001 at 16:02:18 (-0800) Michael Perelman writes: Is it ever possible to the disprove market efficiency to the satisfaction of a conservative economist? I think this is too narrow a battle field. Market efficiency can be defined in any number of ways, short-term,

BLS Daily Report

2001-12-28 Thread Richardson_D
BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, DAILY REPORT, THURSDAY, JANUARY 27, 2001: In 1997, a commission appointed by the Senate Finance Commission concluded that the annual Consumer Price Index computed by the Bureau of Labor Statistics was probably 1.1 percent too high, and perhaps even more. The Boskin

FW: question on economics

2001-12-28 Thread Devine, James
I received the following question, the answer to which may be of interest: I am having trouble understanding Marx's labor theory of value. Is it true that prices reflect the law of value because prices tend in the long term to stay a certain price for some time relativly interupted by laws of

RE: Re: the profit rate recession

2001-12-28 Thread Devine, James
Bill Burgess writes: Yes, I did find your talk interesting. Do you have any similar numbers for other countries, or when you compare your trends for the US with profit trends in other countries, what are the differences? I don't have that data, though the OECD used to publish them. It's clearly

Re: FW: question on economics

2001-12-28 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
I received the following question, the answer to which may be of interest: I am having trouble understanding Marx's labor theory of value. Is it true that prices reflect the law of value because prices tend in the long term to stay a certain price for some time relativly interupted by laws of

Re: hit the economy: bin Laden

2001-12-28 Thread Ann Li
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/reuters/asia-80674.html --- http://www.aljazeera.net/programs/no_limits/ text-translator site: http://tarjim.ajeeb.com/ajeeb/default.asp?lang=1 - Original Message - From: Chris Burford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

RE: Re: FW: question on economics

2001-12-28 Thread Devine, James
a student asked: I am having trouble understanding Marx's labor theory of value. Is it true that prices reflect the law of value because prices tend in the long term to stay a certain price for some time relativly interupted by laws of supply and demand ?(as Mandel says for example) From What i

Article on Civilian Deaths in Afghanistan

2001-12-28 Thread Ken Hanly
Is there any thought that the US might compensate families of innocent victims for their losses? It seems that Afghan allies lives are not equal to those of US marines. Searching Tora Bora caves is apparently too dangerous for US marines and is to be contracted out to locals for pay. They had

Imperialism Today

2001-12-28 Thread Yoshie Furuhashi
Greg Schofield wrote to Charles Brown: Just these points alone demand a thorough rethink - what does not cut any ice is simply labling things Imperialistic when there is no current theory which takes these new aspects on board. You mentioned the export of capital, no doubt it happens to some

Re: Re: hit the economy: bin Laden

2001-12-28 Thread Chris Burford
At 28/12/01 11:38 -0500, you wrote: http://sg.news.yahoo.com/reuters/asia-80674.html Interestingly although this is described as the full Reuters transcript it censors out the call to hit the economy of the US that at least occurs in the BBC version in this form:- It is important to hit

Tree Trade

2001-12-28 Thread Ian Murray
A U.S.-Canada Forest Fight Tariff Dispute Causes Layoffs and Rancor By DeNeen L. Brown Washington Post Foreign Service Friday, December 28, 2001; Page E01 VANCOUVER, B.C. Thousands of logs float idly in rivers in British Columbia, where sawmills have gone quiet, workers have been laid off and

Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Enron's Success Story

2001-12-28 Thread Doug Henwood
Max Sawicky wrote: The mere fact of a company failing, even a large one, is not a market failure. I'm away on an inter-holiday retreat, and only sporadically checking email, so someone else may have made this point already. No free marketeer would ever regard a big failure as an indictment of

Re: RE: RE: Re: the profit rate recession

2001-12-28 Thread Doug Henwood
Devine, James wrote: Rakesh writes: Doug H and Fred M have both argued that spike of profit rate (as conventionally measured) especially in the 90s was a result influx of foreign capital, which reduced borrowing costs. I missed this. I don't know what Doug and Fred argue here, but I think

Re: Re: RE: Re: textiles

2001-12-28 Thread Doug Henwood
Rakesh Bhandari wrote: michael pugliese wrote: Yesterday on NPR it was said that 75,000 textile jobs have been lost in the last yr. lost due to national and global recession? loss of jobs that would have been added if not for recession? lost due to automation? lost to specifically

Re: textiles

2001-12-28 Thread Doug Henwood
Rakesh Bhandari wrote: An old nemesis who runs marxmail.org was kind enough to send this to me this morning: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/12/27/opinion/27BRAI.html For no reason other than to stir up trouble, I presume. Doug and Liza, have USAS said anything about all this yet? It's not a

Re: Re: textiles

2001-12-28 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
Aside from that, don't U.S. textile and apparel workers deserve some sort of attention? My soundbite is protect the worker, not the job, but I'd like to hear what you think should happen to disemployed workers in this sector, who are disproportionally nonwhite and female and generally

Re: Re: RE: RE: Re: the profit rate recession

2001-12-28 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
Devine, James wrote: Rakesh writes: Doug H and Fred M have both argued that spike of profit rate (as conventionally measured) especially in the 90s was a result influx of foreign capital, which reduced borrowing costs. I missed this. I don't know what Doug and Fred argue here, but I think

Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: textiles

2001-12-28 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
Total employment, from the BLS establishment survey (thousands) 11/00 11/01 change Textile mill products... 514447 - 67 Apparel and other textile products.. 611532 - 79 total textile

Excellent analysis of Argentine crisis

2001-12-28 Thread Steve Diamond
Note the argument that links Argentinian crisis to hollowing out of American manufacturing. - International Perspective- by Marshall Auerback AMERICA'S 'STRONG DOLLAR' POLICY AND ARGENTINA'S DEFAULT: A ROOT CAUSE THAT DARE NOT SPEAK ITS NAME 28 December 2001

Re: Re: Re: textiles

2001-12-28 Thread Michael Perelman
Rakesh, I have enjoyed your posts on pen-l and elesewhere, but it is necessary that you avoid provocative, personal statements like this On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 04:47:19PM -0800, Rakesh Bhandari wrote: Doug, I have put a lot of thought in my previous attempts to answer this question that

Re: RE: jim d? doug?

2001-12-28 Thread Joshua Bragg
Jim, Unfortunately I missed your presentation here in Sacramento. I heard that you were great. I wonder if you could either post your notes on pen-l or send them to me. Thanks and Happy New Year, Joshua Bragg student at Marxist School of Sacramento - Original Message - From: Devine,

Re: free trade CORRECTED YET AGAIN

2001-12-28 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
for the file on trade theory: Utsa Patnaik in her E.M.S. Namboodiripad Memorial Lecture, which we publish as the lead article in the current number of Social Scientist, provides a powerful critique of Ricardo's proposition along altogether novel lines, namely that Ricardo's example itself

Re: Re: free trade CORRECTED YET AGAIN

2001-12-28 Thread Michael Perelman
What is her critique of Sen? On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 07:33:05PM -0800, Rakesh Bhandari wrote: for the file on trade theory: Utsa Patnaik in her E.M.S. Namboodiripad Memorial Lecture, which we publish as the lead article in the current number of Social Scientist, provides a powerful

Re: Re: Re: free trade CORRECTED YET AGAIN

2001-12-28 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
Title: Re: [PEN-L:21021] Re: Re: free trade CORRECTED YET AGA What is her critique of Sen? she says in this piece that while agreeing that the proximate cause of the great toll of the 1943 bengal famine was wartime deficit financing, the ultimate cause was the increased vulnerability which

Re: Re: Re: textiles

2001-12-28 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
Aside from that, don't U.S. textile and apparel workers deserve some sort of attention? that's not the question; they get attention embodied in protective law. And, excuse me, is that a question at all or is it an accusation? Are you implying that I (with that foreign born name written on

Re: Re: Re: Re: textiles

2001-12-28 Thread Michael Perelman
Part of the question seems to be how do you organize in the absence of international solidarity? In short, how do you make Cambodian wages move up instead of US wages moving down? Wouldn't the center of gravity of a competitive international wage be close to China? The intellectually easy, but

Re: Re: Re: Re: free trade CORRECTED YET AGAIN

2001-12-28 Thread Ian Murray
Title: Re: [PEN-L:21021] Re: Re: free trade CORRECTED YET AGA - Original Message - From: Rakesh Bhandari To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 8:09 PM Subject: [PEN-L:21022] Re: Re: Re: free trade CORRECTED YET AGAIN What is her critique