Re: Tariq Ali on the US election

2004-08-07 Thread Carl Remick
From: Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before getting to the point of actually being able to split the Democratic and Republican Parties, we need an intermediate goal: do what we can to make the next POTUS a weak president, rather than a strong one. To do so, we need to decrease the shares of

Re: Tariq Ali on the US election

2004-08-07 Thread Carl Remick
From: Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Before getting to the point of actually being able to split the Democratic and Republican Parties, we need an intermediate goal: do what we can to make the next POTUS a weak president, rather than a strong one. To

Re: Jon Stewart versus Ted Koppel

2004-08-03 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Koppel will be a guest on the Daily Show this thursday.) slate.com Battle of the Network Anchors Ted Koppel and Jon Stewart face off on the convention floor. By Dana Stevens ... In a one-on-one chat on the deserted convention floor after the day's festivities

Re: No bounce for Kerry

2004-08-03 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] So why did Bush, not Kerry, get the bounce? Tue Aug 3, 7:09 AM ET By Susan Page, USA TODAY There was a bounce after last week's Democratic National Convention. But it went to President Bush, not John Kerry. Kerry should lose Licorice the hamster. Carl

Re: John Edwards speaks

2004-07-29 Thread Carl Remick
Louis Proyect quoted John Edwards: ... That’s why we will strengthen and modernize our military. We will double our Special Forces, and invest in the new equipment and technologies so that our military remains the best equipped and best trained in the world. This will make our military stronger

Re: Israel pushing for Kurdish state? -

2004-07-29 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yoshie Furuhashi wrote: You have no moral right to be acting superior to terrorists, since you intend to vote for one. But to be fair to John Kerry, he is only involved with state-sponsored terrorism. As far as I know, he has never been involved in a suicide

Re: Thomas Frank op-ed piece

2004-07-16 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Frank's new book What's Wrong With Kansas argues implicitly that the Democrats lose elections because they are identified with the wrong side of the culture wars. This is the same sort of position that Michael Moore argued in the Nation Magazine in

Re: Thomas Frank op-ed piece

2004-07-16 Thread Carl Remick
From: Michael Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/16/04 10:13 AM (Thomas Frank's new book What's Wrong With Kansas argues implicitly that the Democrats lose elections because they are identified with the wrong side of the culture wars. nah, mainstream poli sci guys christopher achen

Statin update

2004-07-15 Thread Carl Remick
Panel's ties to drugmakers not cited in new cholesterol guidelines BY DELTHIA RICKS AND RONI RABIN July 15, 2004 Guidelines published by a government panel earlier this week, calling for aggressive use of statin medications to lower cholesterol in people at high risk of heart attacks, failed to

Re: Bush insults mentally ill people

2004-07-13 Thread Carl Remick
From: Chris Burford [EMAIL PROTECTED] BBC in London this morning has just played a clip of Bush defending himself with some red-neck stuff about Saddam Hussein that if it is a choice between a madman and defending the American people he will defend the American people. If you take this literally,

Re: absolute general law of capitalist accumulation

2004-07-12 Thread Carl Remick
From: Charles Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks for your comment, Gil. Please excuse a layperson's question, but I have never quite been able to understand this economist's use of secular. What is the definition of secular. Please excuse a layperson's answer: Secular is a trend without end. Carl

Re: US under fire at AIDS conference

2004-07-12 Thread Carl Remick
From: Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can you defeat an alliance of Christian fundamentalists and the drug companies? [Or for that matter, how do you defeat an alliance of drug companies and free-trade advocates?] Trade Pact May Undercut Inexpensive Drug Imports By ELIZABETH BECKER and

Re: Africa should not pay its debts - Jeffrey Sachs

2004-07-11 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have refrained from saying anything about Jeffrey Sachs or (Joseph Stiglitz) being more to the left than other economists, especially in their role as window dressing at Columbia University--my employer. Come, come. You're not threatening a crime against

Re: Africa should not pay its debts - Jeffrey Sachs

2004-07-11 Thread Carl Remick
From: Daniel Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have not followed Sachs closely in most recent times but I think he would strongly object to being called a 'man of the left'. maybe I was being too charitable on this point ... I'd say he's a man of the left in the same sense in which Brad DeLong is ... [In

Re: Fw: [stop-imf] Africa should not pay its debts - Jeffrey Sachs

2004-07-10 Thread Carl Remick
From: Daniel Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sachs has always been basically a man of the left, and has been saying sensible things about sovereign default fo longer than anyone else I can remember (including me and Richard Portes). Perhaps the whole Harvard Institute thing should be viewed by

Re: Fw: [stop-imf] Africa should not pay its debts - Jeffrey Sachs

2004-07-10 Thread Carl Remick
From: sartesian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Really? That's quite an aberration-- participating in the dismantling of the Russian Revolution, transforming the remnants of socialized property into private fortunes. Bingo. As with, Apart from that, how did you enjoy the play, Mrs. Lincoln? Carl

Re: Herman Melville on the difference between capitalism and primitive communism

2004-07-09 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] What a striking evidence does this operation furnish of the wide difference between the extreme of savage and civilized life. A gentleman of Typee can bring up a numerous family of children and give them all a highly respectable cannibal education, with

Re: Kerry that weight...

2004-07-09 Thread Carl Remick
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kerry would keep US troops in Iraq far longer than Bush The Democrat looks like the one with the long-term imperial agenda Jonathan Steele Friday July 9, 2004 The Guardian Here's a dinner-party talking point that can run and run, certainly until November and,

Re: Michael Moore's Dilemma: Israel, Saudi Arabia, and John Kerry

2004-07-08 Thread Carl Remick
From: Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Michael Moore's Dilemma: Israel, Saudi Arabia, and John Kerry (There are two conspicuous absences in Fahrenheit 9/11: John Kerry and Israel. The two absences are dependent on each other. Moore's electioneering really beats the stuffing out of the historical

Re: Michael Moore's Dilemma: Israel, Saudi Arabia, and John Kerry

2004-07-08 Thread Carl Remick
From: Carl Remick [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...To examine the Iraq war without mentioning the neocons and the Wolfowitz Doctrine is like, say, looking at the origins of World War I without mentioning the General General Staff ... Er, make that the German General Staff. I must have been thinking

Re: Business on Edwards

2004-07-07 Thread Carl Remick
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the US, labor unions are on the wane, while the welfare state is getting meaner and less effective at doing its good jobs. So what's a worker to do if injured or cheated by some corporation? Call in a trial lawyer or personal injury lawyer! In the South,

Re: Correction

2004-07-01 Thread Carl Remick
From: Michael Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] [See comment at end] http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/01/pageoneplus/corrections.html The New York Times July 1, 2004 Corrections ... As Eric Umansky of Todays Papers points out, this correction fails to mention the tiny bit of context that his purported

Re: Sowell

2004-07-01 Thread Carl Remick
From: David B. Shemano [EMAIL PROTECTED] BTW, the Reason review of Doug Henwood's book is now online: http://www.reason.com/0406/cr.co.that.shtml Well that was two minutes wasted. I'd suggest that Reason critic Charles Oliver hold onto his day job, in which he covers local government for The

Re: The presidential election and the Supreme Court

2004-06-30 Thread Carl Remick
From: Daniel Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] I seem to remember from university days that the power of Congress to decide whether or not the USA is at war or not, is one that has repeatedly been ignored by successive US Presidents ... Hey, credit where it's due! This provision has been ignored by

Re: Putin

2004-06-24 Thread Carl Remick
From: Chris Doss [EMAIL PROTECTED] By the way . . . Lenin is dead. This might come as a shock. I believe they have finally taken his body off display. I mean Leninism is dead. --- He's still in the Mausoleum on Red Square (which is a really nice little piece of architecture). They recently dressed

Re: Putin

2004-06-24 Thread Carl Remick
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] I doubt that anyone wants to be put on permanent display... [Clearly you never met Jeremy Bentham.] The Auto-Icon At the end of the South Cloisters of the main building of UCL stands a wooden cabinet, which has been a source of curiosity and perplexity to

Re: Thomas Frank's new book

2004-06-21 Thread Carl Remick
From: Doug Henwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] Eugene Coyle wrote: What's Wrong With Kansas, the new book by Thomas Frank is interesting. His acknowledgements include a roster of Pen-L ers. Including, if I'm remembering correctly, Eugene Coyle. Doug Hmm, modesty abounds. From WWWK's Acknowledgments: Gene

Re: Ronald Reagan, R.I.P.

2004-06-10 Thread Carl Remick
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] someone I know reported that he once saw Ronald Reagan walk on water -- and then turn water into wine. And mirabile dictu, he turned ketchup into a vegetable. Carl _ Getting married? Find great

Re: Reagan's legacy

2004-06-07 Thread Carl Remick
From: Frank, Ellen [EMAIL PROTECTED] This morning, NPR's Nina Tottenberg was talking about Reagan's appointments of Scalia and Bork to the Supreme Court -- calling them leading intellects of the conservative movement. Ellen Reminds me of Groucho Marx's remark about so-and-so being the brains of

Re: Thinking for ourselves: Remembering World War II

2004-05-29 Thread Carl Remick
From: Joel Wendland [EMAIL PROTECTED] A WW2 vet and peace activist clleague of mine went to the memorial on its opening day. He described it as a celebration of empire and military might. He said that it completely ignored the human cost of war and there is only indirect indication that men and

Re: NY Review of Books

2004-05-21 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: PEN-L list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L] NY Review of Books Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 16:32:49 -0400 In the winter of 1962-63, during a strike of the NY Times, Robert Silvers and a few close friends decided to launch the New

Re: The Simpsons on Alcatraz

2004-05-17 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] Last night I turned on the Simpsons for the first time in months--ten minutes into the show. The family were guests on a Fox-TV type show with the host browbeating them for not loving America enough. When Marge and Lisa tell him something to the effect that if

Re: game theory

2004-05-17 Thread Carl Remick
From: Doug Henwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freud recounts an old Jewish joke in, I think, his book on jokes. The gist of it is that one guy runs into another in the Warsaw railroad station and says, Why did you tell me you were going to Cracow the other day when you were really going to Cracow? Rimshot

Re: NYT: The story of the wounded

2003-11-16 Thread Carl Remick
From: Michael Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Thanks to body armor, the proportion of the wounded that are amputees is supposed to be paradoxically higher, because without it many of them would have died. I keep wondering whether the count of the wounded might not end up someday being the politically

Re: Democrats worry about Bush pullout

2003-11-14 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] NY Times, November 14, 2003 In U.S., Fears Are Voiced of a Too-Rapid Iraq Exit By STEVEN R. WEISMAN and CARL HULSE ... My greatest fear is that this administration, having made all the wrong choices, is going to conclude they have to bring Johnny and Jane

Re: new radio product

2003-11-12 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] You also have to keep in mind that there was no such thing as advertising, department stores and mass communications in Marx's age. Sometimes I have to catch my breath when I look around me at all the advertising in NYC. Subways, buses, TV shows, radio,

Re: Myron Scholes' day in court

2003-11-05 Thread Carl Remick
From: Michael Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] [This is hilarious. I missed it when it first came out, and someone just told me about it at a Halloween party.] New York Times July 13, 2003, Sunday A Tax Shelter, Deconstructed By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON ... Dr. Scholes has told friends that most of his wealth

Re: The Indisepensable IMF

2003-11-01 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] The New York Times May 15, 1998, Friday, Late Edition - Final The Indispensable I.M.F. By Paul Krugman, CAMBRIDGE, Mass.; Paul Krugman is a professor of economics at M.I.T. ... the International Monetary Fund is all that we have, and it is a lot better than

Re: In defence of Krugman and against Alexander Cockburn: choice oftargets

2003-11-01 Thread Carl Remick
Carl, I smoked a pipe for several decades before quitting -- and I would be afraid to add up how many thousands of dollars (not covered by insurance) I have spent on repairing (partly) the damage it did to my teeth. Right now, I've got a large gap in the front of my mouth (upper) which has cost me

Re: In defence of Krugman

2003-11-01 Thread Carl Remick
From: andie nachgeborenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Roosevelt tried to pack the court, and failed. One of the former bad guy justices switched his view and started supporting the New Deal Or as was said at the time: A switch in time saves nine. Carl

Re: In defence of Krugman and against Alexander Cockburn: choice of targets

2003-10-31 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jurriaan Bendien wrote: The question that needs to be asked is what we achieve by polemically writing off Krugman and calling him nasty names. Krugman is a very learned left-liberal economist capable of very good critical inquiry into the US economy and

Re: In defence of Krugman and against Alexander Cockburn: choice of targets

2003-10-31 Thread Carl Remick
From: andie nachgeborenen [EMAIL PROTECTED] I make my living in part defending tobacco companies, and I make a lot of money too -- not as much as Dees, but I'm getting there, if I stay here, I will someday. I must be a real scumbag. No, as a pipe smoker I must say you're serving a worthy cause.

Re: PBS documentary on Iraq

2003-10-13 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is a telling moment in this documentary that makes the Iraqi resistance understandable. Shortly after a decision has been made by the US to crack down on looting, we see an army patrol that has captured a perpetrator who has a bunch of stolen wood on

The unique Michael Moore

2003-10-04 Thread Carl Remick
A fine article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/michaelmoore/story/0,13947,1055591,00.html Carl _ Share your photos without swamping your Inbox. Get Hotmail Extra Storage today! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es

Re: George W. Bush, c'est fini

2003-10-03 Thread Carl Remick
From: Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bush is finished -- it's time to plan ahead for a struggle against a Democratic President in the White House who won't end the occupation of Iraq (thirteen months is a shorter period of time than you think). ... Over all, the poll found, Americans are for

Re: The oil and gas situation, according to the expurts

2003-10-03 Thread Carl Remick
From: Mike Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Only people with masochistic tendencies like being freely smacked around by the invisible hand. Most people instinctively put their hands up to protect themselves ... [Some, of course, are better positioned than others to blunt the blows :) The following is

Re: Rush Limbaugh

2003-10-02 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] The other day I was reading an interesting commentary on George W. Bush, where unfortunately I cannot remember. It stated that he has been underestimated by the left and is capable of a wolverine-like intelligence when it comes to the imperial interests of

Re: Michael Pollak's Pebble Theory

2003-10-02 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] === Washington Post, Thursday, October 2, 2003 Can't They Just Admit It? By George F. Will ... Americans know that government, whether disbursing money or gathering intelligence, is not an instrument of precision. Hence they want the government to have the

Re: Re: academic angst

2003-04-05 Thread Carl Remick
From: Doug Henwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] Devine, James wrote: from MS SLATE's on-line summary of major US newspapers Finally, the NY [TIMES] fronts the growing divide on college campuses between peace-loving professors, many of them veterans of the Vietnam era, and their hawkish, right-leaning

Re: Re: Re: the emporer

2003-04-03 Thread Carl Remick
Your fervor to deny that anything good could be American is disturbing. jks You're mired in nostalgia, Justin. I can't think of a single good thing to say about the contemporary United States. Carl _ Help STOP SPAM with the new

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the emporer

2003-04-03 Thread Carl Remick
At 08:29 PM 04/03/2003 +, you wrote: You're mired in nostalgia, Justin. I can't think of a single good thing to say about the contemporary United States. The very, very large anti-war demonstrations? Joanna Ah, yes, the demonstrations -- with their very, very, very modest favorable impact

Re: Re: the emporer

2003-04-03 Thread Carl Remick
From: Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, Carl isn't a socialist -- he's a fellow traveler. :- The woes of taxonomy! As you'll recall, I am a soi-disant *fallow* traveler. But I do nail my colors to the mast as a socialist of some sort ... being, ah, mired in nostalgia myself. Carl

Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: the emporer

2003-04-03 Thread Carl Remick
PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine -Original Message- From: andie nachgeborenen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Yoshie, see? Carl Remick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your fervor to deny that anything good could be American is disturbing. jks You're mired

Re: Re: the emporer

2003-04-03 Thread Carl Remick
From: Yoshie Furuhashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Carl: a socialist of some sort Of a grouchy sort, I'm sure. :- Grouchy and worse. Like my neighbor Walt Whitman: I am he who knew what it was to be evil; I too knitted the old knot of contrariety, Blabb’d, blush’d, resented, lied, stole, grudg’d, Had

Re: Re: Falling perles

2003-03-28 Thread Carl Remick
From: joanna bujes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Say what? He just resigned his chairmanship -- lowering his profile, increasing his ability to influence policy AND rake in the $$. That's all. Alas. Hold the alas please. Perle's not exactly chortling with glee at this development. As the NY Times

Re: FT readers against the war

2003-03-26 Thread Carl Remick
From: Chris Burford [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... I am going to stick my neck out: if the people of the world and finance capitalism are not in favour of this war we should not expect it to be very successful politically. Who will be the fall guy? Who will take the blame for any fiasco? Judging from

Re: An Empire in denial

2003-03-24 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chronicle of Higher Education, March 28, 2003 America: an Empire in Denial By NIALL FERGUSON ... Was the British empire a good or bad thing? It is nowadays quite conventional to think that, on balance, it was a bad thing. ... [Score one for conventional

Re: Letter to Michael Ignatieff

2003-03-23 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... liberal pundits like Max Lerner who supported the war and in whose careerist footpath you are following. Haven't heard Lerner mentioned in years. In his day, he was the gold standard in fatuousness. He wound up as Scholar-in-Residence at the Playboy

Re: an establishmentarian liberal speaks.

2003-03-23 Thread Carl Remick
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] Good Foreign Policy a Casualty of War Today, it is we Americans who live in infamy. By Arthur Schlesinger Jr. Good column until: Why let the opposition movement fall into the hands of infantile leftists? I think it's time for Arthur to grasp both ends of

Re: Re: Bin Laden's victory - Richard Dawkins

2003-03-22 Thread Carl Remick
From: soula avramidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.michaelparenti.org/IRAQGeorge2.htm Liberal intellectuals are never happier than when, with patronizing smiles, they can dilate on the stupidity of George Bush. What I have tried to show is that Bush is neither retarded nor misdirected. Given

Re: Re: Re: Re: Bin Laden's victory - Richard Dawkins

2003-03-22 Thread Carl Remick
From: soula avramidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Carl Remick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:From: soula avramidis http://www.michaelparenti.org/IRAQGeorge2.htm Liberal intellectuals are never happier than when, with patronizing smiles, they can dilate on the stupidity of George Bush. What I have tried

Re: More Lawyers say war illegal

2003-03-22 Thread Carl Remick
Canadian law professors declare US-led war illegal Hmm, once Iraq gets pulverized I guess there will be an opening in the Axis of Evil, so perhaps the Bush crew will turn their gaze northward -- across that famous world's longest undefended border -- and realize they can do some cleaning up

Re: Zizek's latest

2003-03-19 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] In any case, I urge one and all to read Zizek's essay, if for no other reason, than ... ... it helps to kill time while waiting for this goddamned war to begin. Carl _ STOP MORE SPAM with the

Re: war and the economy

2003-03-19 Thread Carl Remick
From: Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Has any member of Congress spoken up against this war? I saw Daschle's comment where he started out strong, condeming the bastard's lack of diplomacy, but then he said support the troops. [Even Daschle's guarded comments were enough to get him branded a

Re: Code name for Iraq Invasion

2003-03-13 Thread Carl Remick
From: k hanly [EMAIL PROTECTED] So what is the code name of the upcoming invasion of Iraq? Operation Just Because? Operation Enduring Freedom Fries? Operation Desert Madness?Operation Enduring Misery? Operation Infinite Arrogance? Operation Just Us Carl

Re: Re: Forbes includes Arafat Castro among wealthiest heads ofstate

2003-03-05 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...Forbes refers to fortunes, which in ordinary English means personal wealth. Now there have been charges leveled against Fidel Castro, but owning a fortune is not one of them. I think that Forbes grouped Saddam Hussein, Yasir Arafat and Fidel Castro with

Re: Blix report a blow to U.S.

2003-02-14 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blix report a blow to U.S. Feb. 14, 2003 — NBC’s Andrea Mitchell reports that the inspectors’ reports are extremely favorable to Iraq and a blow to U.S. diplomacy. full: http://www.msnbc.com/news/default.asp?0ct=-34o Andrea sure has a lot more cojones

Re: RE: What is wrong with the mainstream economics?

2003-02-13 Thread Carl Remick
From: Devine, James What a big order! If I were to be forced to talk about this subject, I'd stick to the basic point that the problem with mainstream economics is not that it's wrong in its own terms as much as that it's incomplete. ... E.g., it doesn't account for negative externalities, the

Re: duct and cover

2003-02-13 Thread Carl Remick
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] If anyone wants to buy duct-tape, I'll be at Grand Central Station in NYC under the big clock at noon on Saturday. I expect to be able to sell it at about four times the going rate in California... ;-) Hmm, more up-to-date, entrepreneurial conduct than

Re: PEN-L equals redistributionist LIBERALS

2003-02-05 Thread Carl Remick
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I look at PEN-L and all I see are a bunch of LIBERALS from universities whose economic schemes all seem to involve big government coming in to enact their redistributionist schemes. I see a lot of talk about economics, including the discredited Marx. Well here are some

Re: leaked British intelligence report

2003-02-05 Thread Carl Remick
From: Chris Burford [EMAIL PROTECTED] BBC: Leaked report rejects Iraqi al-Qaeda link http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2727471.stm This caused Blair some embarrassment and obliged him to make clear the differences between Britain and the USA ahead of Powell's speech on the question of whether

Re: tax theory/policy

2003-01-23 Thread Carl Remick
From: Ian Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] washingtonpost.com An Economist On a Mission R. Glenn Hubbard's Theory Anchors Bush's Tax Plan -- but Can It Survive? By Jonathan Weisman Washington Post Staff Writer Wednesday, January 22, 2003; Page E01 ... At once owlish and boyish, Hubbard, 44, has already

Re: RE: Re: tax theory/policy

2003-01-23 Thread Carl Remick
From: Max B. Sawicky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L:34061] RE: Re: tax theory/policy Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 09:55:35 -0500 career damage control. January 23, 2003 Report: Bush Economist Hubbard to Leave [Hmm, I wonder what the real story is here.] [Oops, guess the WSJ goofed. Hubbard

Re: Re: the pen-l fairness doctrine

2003-01-13 Thread Carl Remick
From: Bill Lear [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Monday, January 13, 2003 at 06:59:36 (-0800) Devine, James writes: ... By Larry Paquette ... However, I feel no need to defend my position. Over the years I have worked hard and earned every dollar of the obscene wealth I am accused of hoarding. This is

Re: the British empire as entertainment

2003-01-09 Thread Carl Remick
From: Ian Murray A very Tory kind of history Niall Ferguson's feel-good television series on the British empire is a blinkered and sentimental romp I’m reminded of Salon’s interview in November with Steve Earle, the radical country rocker and composer of John Walker's Blues, in which Earle

Re: Re: the humbling?

2002-12-23 Thread Carl Remick
From: Michael Pollak [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, 22 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Absolutely. The fines broken down per bank are minimal. Less than a daily trading revenue swing in any one product. Compared to the $650mln fine levied against Drexell Burnham for their junk bond scandals And

Re: Re: Re: Re: the humbling?

2002-12-23 Thread Carl Remick
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In a message dated 12/23/02 10:16:45 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There was an instant poll on the CBS MarketWatch site last Friday that asked readers whether they thought this settlement was severe enough on the banks, and 80% said no. That's

Re: Re: muscular economics

2002-12-22 Thread Carl Remick
From: Doug Henwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] Michael Perelman wrote: Krugman's latest says: The Washington Post reports that one of Mr. Bush's frequent complaints about Larry Lindsey was that he didn't get enough physical exercise. Yeah, and an earlier article said he looked jowly on TV. ...

UAL ESOPs

2002-12-12 Thread Carl Remick
[ESOPs today will keep communism at bay, says CBS MarketWatch:] ESOP's Fable Commentary: United they fell, yet others succeed By Chris Pummer, CBS.MarketWatch.com Last Update: 8:06 AM ET Dec. 11, 2002 SAN FRANCISCO (CBS.MW) -- In 1994, United Airlines became one of the world's largest

Re: RE: Blowback

2002-12-10 Thread Carl Remick
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't like the word Holocaust as it's been applied. It's best to avoid it, since it's used as part of pro-Israel propaganda. Better is Isaac Deutscher's explanation of the connection between the Nazis and Israel: it's as if someone had jumped out of a

Re: A real horror

2002-11-23 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] Last night after returning from the tasty horror film The Ring, I turned on Charlie Rose and witnessed a real horror. Nancy Pelosi, who I've never seen before, was holding forth on the Democratic Party's prospects. On her lapel was the largest and most

Re: The Economics Biz

2002-11-22 Thread Carl Remick
From: michael perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Columbia Buys Residence To House Top Professor Jon E. Hilsenrath, Wall Street Journal NEW YORK -- Columbia University has taken star wars for college economics professors to a new level with the acquisition of an $8 million townhouse in Manhattan that

Re: RE: Re: The Economics Biz

2002-11-22 Thread Carl Remick
). -Original Message- From: Carl Remick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [Wow. Making Sachs head of this Earth Institute is pretty much like naming Typhoid Mary director of the World Health Organization. E.g., consider what Jude Wanniski had to say in 1998 about Sachs' wondrous role in Russia's

Re: single-payer national health insurance plan

2002-11-16 Thread Carl Remick
From: Chris Burford [EMAIL PROTECTED] Washington Post 16 Nov:- Gore already was making political news. On Wednesday night, he told a New York audience that he had reluctantly come to the conclusion that the only solution to the impending crisis in health care was a single-payer national

Re: Re: little upward mobility in the US, says Fed economist

2002-11-09 Thread Carl Remick
From: joanna bujes [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Hey everybody, we can't all be white collar professionals and we shouldn't reduce education to 1) a ticket to the gated middle class or 2) job training for corporations. Whay can't we proceed from the following assumptions: 1) we all have to share in

Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: against lesser of two evils

2002-11-01 Thread Carl Remick
From: joanna bujes [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 05:21 PM 11/01/2002 -0500, you wrote: Yes, and he should have stayed away from that batty Frieda Kahlo as well. Hell, he didn't even get a portrait out of it. Joanna No, not of himself. Instead, he was honored in a more characteristically

Re: Re: Western Rationality

2002-10-13 Thread Carl Remick
From: Sabri Oncu [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... (western) rationality is that human behaviour, possibly emerged in Europe some centuries ago, which attemps to impose a complete order on an infinite dimensional set, that is, a continuum, that I call life. Life as a continuum can at best be a partially

Re: Re: Re: What is science

2002-10-13 Thread Carl Remick
From: Carrol Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Both (Carl Sceptical Inquirer) are pitching religous woo-woo and can't tell us much about the actual world. Carrol Woo-woo it may be, but it is of a decidedly irreligious nature. Know then thyself, presume not God to scan, what? The proper study of

Re: RE: Re: RE: Western Rationality

2002-10-12 Thread Carl Remick
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] Carl: I think enlightenment comes from within, not from any evidence the social sciences can produce. But that's just me channeling R. W. Emerson again. if enlightenment comes only from within, then there's no way to convince anyone else of the validity of

Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: what is science?

2002-10-12 Thread Carl Remick
The errors of SCIENCE will never be corrected by the kind of critique Carl offers because what Carl is attacking doesn't exist Carrol What a relief. Would that were true for everything I attack. Carl _ Send and receive

Re: RE: what is science?

2002-10-11 Thread Carl Remick
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] BTW, I still want to know what the alternative is to scientific (logical-empirical) thinking. I'd say intuition, but that's only a hunch :) Carl _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger:

Re: what is science?

2002-10-11 Thread Carl Remick
From: ravi [EMAIL PROTECTED] my own suspicion (which i will try to flesh out if this thread proceeds) is that what is broadly accepted as science or scientific activity (or approach), by the high priests and their followers, is indeed inherently dehumanizing (i think that's carl remick's [sp?]

Re: RE: Western Rationality

2002-10-11 Thread Carl Remick
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] Carl writes: Again, I believe it's the nature of science itself -- not just the corruptive effects of capitalism -- that so often causes technology to have a destructive, dehumanizing impact on society. The ever increasing specialization of scientific

Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Western Rationality

2002-10-10 Thread Carl Remick
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] Joanna writes: A critique of the development of science under capitalism would take much more than an email. Suffice it to say that what we refer to as SCIENCE today is a specific historical form suffering from specific historical deformations. I leave it

Re: RE: Re: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread Carl Remick
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ian: Indeed, lots of the problems of modernity are the uses to which logic, scientific thinking etc. have been put and those problems are not reducible to the problems created by capitalism. Carl: Yes, I think the basis of many of modern society's

Re: RE: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread Carl Remick
From: Devine, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] The issue of attaining zero unemployment is not about measuring it. Rather, it's about figuring out a better way to organize society that doesn't organically involve unemployment (open or hidden). Hear, hear, Jim. Yes, let's keep our eyes on the prize!

Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Western Rationality

2002-10-09 Thread Carl Remick
From: joanna bujes [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 02:41 PM 10/09/2002 +, you wrote: That's the horror of it all. As Huxley suggested in Brave New World, there doesn't seem to be any choice between the dehumanization of science and reversion to simple savagery. As I said, I don't have any answer to

Re: Western Rationality

2002-10-08 Thread Carl Remick
Ian: Indeed, lots of the problems of modernity are the uses to which logic, scientific thinking etc. have been put and those problems are not reducible to the problems created by capitalism. Yes, I think the basis of many of modern society's worst difficulties is the pernicious objectification

Re: Denis Dutton's website goes belly up

2002-10-07 Thread Carl Remick
From: Louis Proyect [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dutton, a New Zealand professor hailing originally from the USA, first attracted attention for handing out Bad Writing awards each year to people like Judith Butler. At the time, I was a big fan of Alan Sokal and greeted these awards with great relish

Re: RE: Re: Holy Roman Empire 2002

2002-10-04 Thread Carl Remick
From: Mark Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L:30886] RE: Re: Holy Roman Empire 2002 Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:59:10 +0100 I can't remember who it was who said of the Holy Roman Empire that it was neither holy, Roman, nor an empire. Macaulay?

  1   2   >