Visual Realism, versus U.S. Modernism

2000-11-12 Thread Doyle Saylor
tion device that can send pictures, there is a great need for those pictures to be realistic. No doubt people don't have to be realistic, but the intelligibility of interconnectedness is fundamental to human mental labor. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Affective Conversational Marxism

2000-11-11 Thread Doyle Saylor
the future society. That implies the death of rationalism. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: meme

2000-11-11 Thread Doyle Saylor
gene does do what we say it does. And in turn the causality asserted hides the thinking supporting the assertion which relies upon statistical methods of work which do not show such structures. thanks, Doyle Saylor

no subject

2000-10-28 Thread Doyle Saylor
signoff PEN-L

Knowledge Management and elists

2000-10-22 Thread Doyle Saylor
ration) 2.4MBS which is fast enough for video and music downloads and uploads. (see Scientific American, October 2000, page 54) thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: Knowledge Management and elists

2000-10-22 Thread Doyle Saylor
concerning knowledge capital, and for us shaping the workers experience of knowledge production. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Embodiment, disability, sexuality, emotion, some sources onembodiment

2000-10-08 Thread Doyle Saylor
. What size of a group, what does social cohesion require in a group, etc. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: post-autistic economics

2000-09-06 Thread Doyle Saylor
level to match wits against up to this moment. In turn I want you to find my level of response suitable to the demands you make of anyone who talks to you. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: post-autistic economics

2000-09-03 Thread Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists, Jim Devine writes about calling current economics autistic, Jim, I'm not sure I like the idea of "post-autistic economics." The problem is that the analogy of the dominant school of economics with autism doesn't work as well as it should. Doyle Let's use the metaphor

Re: Re: Re: post-autistic economics

2000-09-03 Thread Doyle Saylor
is like using the various religious concepts that also could be applied to economics. The economy plunged into a severe depression, and it was God's will. They give little good information about what disembodiment means, and they appeal to popular prejudice about disabled people. thank you, Doyle

Re: Re: Re: post-autistic economics

2000-09-03 Thread Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists, Jim Devine writes at length about his view on, Jim, The key problems of the dominant school of economics involve being anti-social (following Maggie T to see society as an illusion, with only individuals being real) and excessively abstract. and concluding remark, I

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: post-autistic economics

2000-09-03 Thread Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists, Rob Schaap responds to my remarks, by going back to a previous line of reasoning he has made before, but repeats in this remark here, Rob, Didn't want to use 'dismbodiment' precisely 'coz its meaning and virtues as analogy were in contention here (I'm learning to be

Re: [Fwd: post-autistic economics newsletter, No.1(fwd)]

2000-09-02 Thread Doyle Saylor
The French movement asserts a lack of historical sense to mathematics. There could be many other elements. For example mathematics tends to be a male oriented field. So disembodiment probably also has a sexism component to how the structure denies women entry. Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: Re: Evidence? (was Re: irrrational (feminist) calculations)

2000-08-03 Thread Doyle Saylor
w disabled people need access to social structures, because the persons who make the ad hoc judgements of what works for them will assume an able bodied perspective since they can't know for example how chronic depression shapes consciousness. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: Re: irrrational (feminist) calculations

2000-08-01 Thread Doyle Saylor
y people are against homosexuality. The problem is not a disabled phobia, or fears of homosexuals. The range of feelings involved against homosexuals is not just fear. Nor is there any reason to think that being disabled has anything to do with being against homosexuals. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: rational expectations

2000-07-31 Thread Doyle Saylor
is because it does not acknowledge why such things stabilize in peoples minds for extended periods of time. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: Re: rational expectations

2000-07-30 Thread Doyle Saylor
is the best way to raise how a disability creates class structure in a sexist system of oppression? Of course that raises the issue of access to work that is not disabling. Or as Yoshie points out, why aren't there more female economists? thanks, Doyle Saylor

Plain Text version of Re: Re: rational expectations

2000-07-30 Thread Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists, I will no longer use HTML to color something I am quoting. I dislike the next to quotes, so I will continue to cut and paste unless that is also causing problems. I understand now that the styling of the text causes problems. I will no longer do that. Thanks for the

Re: Re: Re: Re: Dogmatism, and homosexuality

2000-06-30 Thread Doyle Saylor
rms of social organization to emerge given the input from the other areas like a theory of anothers mind which explode the conceptual boundaries of labels like dogmatism. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: Re: Re: Dogmatism, and homosexuality

2000-06-28 Thread Doyle Saylor
more substantial out of the whole business surrounding "dogmatism". So I am hoping this thread can develop in depth. I will respond in a day or two. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Dogmatism, and homosexuality

2000-06-28 Thread Doyle Saylor
Well Hello, Mark Jones gets the point across to me this way, Greetings Economists, Doyle, I don't think you should speak of/to the disabled like this. Mark Jones Doyle You know what, I rather like you. You kind of grow on a person. By the way you wicked provoker, the last two weeks of my

Re: Re: Dogmatism, and homosexuality

2000-06-27 Thread Doyle Saylor
ical whole of economic systems. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: Re: Re: Concerning Wynne Godley

2000-06-25 Thread Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists, C. Gregory writes, Christian Gregory I get that. Doyle In reference to what Michael Perelman was writing about bonds being withdrawn as debt is paid off. C. Gregory continues, Christian Gregory, I don't get why the disappearance of those assets automatically means

Re: Typo correction, Re: Re: Re: Re: ConcerningWynne Godley

2000-06-25 Thread Doyle Saylor
Title: Re: [PEN-L:20674] Typo correction, Re: Re: Re: Re: Concerning Wynne Godley Greetings Economists, I felt the need to restate what C. Gregory asked to M. Perelman. I failed to put a question mark in the sentence where I meant it. See below for correction. Christian Gregory I get that.

Dogmatism, and homosexuality

2000-06-25 Thread Doyle Saylor
off tangible objects in the world into the whole global communications system. This lifting off from local space is what will constitute the decisive universal structure of global human society. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Entertaining Dogma (was Re: Peter Dorman andRobin Hahnel)

2000-06-22 Thread Doyle Saylor
want to reply to this quotation, Yoshie, Nothing strengthens the case for scepticism more than the fact that there are people who are not sceptics. If they all were, they would be wrong. Pascal, _Pensees_ Doyle My brain is fried. But I can appreciate the truth in those words. thanks, Doyle

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Peter Dorman and RobinHahnel

2000-06-21 Thread Doyle Saylor
to this web site, your phrase irony-impaired is offensive. You have a lot of gall to criticize anyone for being irony-impaired. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Jerks, was Re: Peter Dorman and Robin Hahnel

2000-06-21 Thread Doyle Saylor
Title: Re: [PEN-L:20521] Jerks, was Re: Peter Dorman and RobinHahnel Greetings Economists, Carrol Cox brings up my wanting a definition about Jerk, Carrol, Actually, Doyle, the current popularity of the term jerk (which used to be a rather mild epithet but has become a rather sharp one) is

Re: Re: Jerks, was Re: Peter Dorman and RobinHahnel

2000-06-21 Thread Doyle Saylor
, and Alan Greenspan. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: name calling

2000-06-18 Thread Doyle Saylor
and I are on the same side. You in trouble I'm in trouble. Solidarity! thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: Re: Psychology: Physics Envy or Lit-CritEnvy

2000-06-15 Thread Doyle Saylor
that assertion though there are various ways to demonstrate that "rational" judgement is shaped by emotions. You have written before that we ought not to confuse writing with thinking. I would like you to dilate then on what exactly "rationality" means to you in the sense that it is not wholly like what we see appear upon paper. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Mau-mauing The Oppressor and other crazy shit

2000-06-13 Thread Doyle Saylor
the obsessive-compulsive disorder as the first order approximation of the problem. You take the moral position that pathology is the key way to understand capitalism. And as Marx would surely write, such is a diversion from the reality that must be understood. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: Re: As the fetish implodes

2000-06-11 Thread Doyle Saylor
oppression. When looked at closely though it simply combines the widespread anti-disabled thinking to attacking people as anti-homosexual since they are morally bad because they are disabled through a phobia. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: As the fetish implodes

2000-06-11 Thread Doyle Saylor
the pathology of Nike ads and products fixes the pathology. I'm skeptical about that assertion, and I dislike using disabled people as scapegoats for the problems with the U.S. economy. I intend to go out watch a good movie and have fun today. TA TA. thanks, Doyle Saylor I question his focus on a disability

Re: As the fetish implodes

2000-06-10 Thread Doyle Saylor
, and schizophrenics, and lepers, and old people, etc. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: JD on EITC (Was Krugman Watch)

2000-05-29 Thread Doyle Saylor
important, but how does one make something happen? It will be slow, it will be hard to control, it will happen only because it was necessary to do something because things were so rough the choices were forced upon people. Thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: anthropology question

2000-05-28 Thread Doyle Saylor
be an illusion of proximity issues in perception that carries forward to our own time. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: Re: anthropology question

2000-05-27 Thread Doyle Saylor
what those human beings had to work with, and produced, and what that means for us, but freed from this superstition? To say language is thinking is a superstition, and not understanding that point is profound indeed. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Disability Issues, An arrow in the new economy

2000-05-21 Thread Doyle Saylor
are given a unexplored terrain of organizing. As the above example shows with insights about what stroke sometimes does, we have the materialist sources to understand much deeper what is going on in the system that oppresses workers, we need to bring that in to our movement. thanks, Doyle Saylor

The Neutrality of the Status Quo, was Resolutionof theInformation Bureau

2000-05-20 Thread Doyle Saylor
at midnight on December 24. Doyle Just a book I picked up to read about how a liberal views current political structure within the interior of the U.S. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: Re: Genderization

2000-05-19 Thread Doyle Saylor
explaining human minds. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Genderization

2000-05-17 Thread Doyle Saylor
Title: Re: [PEN-L:19164] Genderization Greetings Economists, Sam Pawlett observes, Sam, I still don't understand the hostility towards essentialism. Essentialism is just the idea that an object has a property that it cannot do without and still be the same object. You might say that an

Re: Re: On forgiving

2000-05-15 Thread Doyle Saylor
ical creativeness of Churchill. By definition those sorts of moods are very intense, but unlike the brief word, bullshit, real feelings are much more complex than the word of an expletive imply. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: American looneyism

2000-05-12 Thread Doyle Saylor
It doesn't take much to uncover that. Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Capital dreams

2000-05-07 Thread Doyle Saylor
is the major area that most would change. Most of the manufacturing work of that sort of emotional contact still is theorized by most people as a proximity work. The person I share a room with. There is nothing about that which is necessary and sufficient. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Against Psychologism

2000-04-14 Thread Doyle Saylor
, by using Freudian thinking. That is a very serious criticism of psychological theory. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Re: Re: Re: Anti-Eurocentrism: Idealist DiversionfromAnti-r

2000-04-12 Thread Doyle Saylor
for the real thing, practice for the fun of it too. No place to run, no place hide, Doyle Saylor

Re: genome news (fwd)

2000-04-09 Thread Doyle Saylor
are as sloppy as you accuse Mine of being. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Re: Keeping Tabb

2000-03-29 Thread Doyle Saylor
, b leave the impression you understand schizophrenia and therefore your comment is realistic about the writers, c never be questioned about your perpetual habit of name calling someone you disagree with some kind of disabled person, because that belittles them in your opinion. thanks, Doyle Saylor

Thought and Language, was Re: Capital is wrong

2000-03-12 Thread Doyle Saylor
physically demonstrate. thank you, Doyle Saylor Ps for a good read on the physical properties of vision I recommend: Vision Science, Palmer, Bradford Books, Mit press, 1999, Where Palmer clearly states in this university level textbook (mainly aimed at undergraduates though suitable for high school

<    1   2   3