I am really sorry that I have to reply in the manner that
I am about to because it is in fact a sad commentary on
today's youth. That being said, here goes.
I am not sure that the youth of this country honestly want
a strong input into anything. I work extensively with
student government for
I found an interesting little quote in my mail today from
some publication called "Imprimis"note I did NOT order
this trash it was simply sent to me so I could "share" it
with my students...which I will not. Well, enough of my
talking, here is the quote:
It doesn't matter if
I can very well speak for Loren since I am him! I was
not in ANYWAY looking to blame ANYONE. Instead, I was
simply looking to have an intellectual discussion on
the relationship between capital (the capitalist) and
the increased participation of women in the labor force.
I never brought up
I am only beginning the development of an idea that I would like
to hear some of your opinions concerning women in the work force.
Before I begin, let me preface this entire post by stating that
in NO WAY am I advocating anything that would limit womens' entrance
into the labor force; instead, I
I find it very interesting that no one to date has picked
up any thread of the argument that the capitalist is the
big winner or that investment may actually be redarded
by plentiful and cheap labor. This was the main emphasis
of my orginaly post. I would really like to hear what
the list has
I have been kicking around the idea of eleminating the states
as an economic initiative. While I realize that this is not
a feasible initiative, I have also considered the possibility
of a federal ban on all state taxation. I believe that there
would be considerable benefit to this sort of
Peter and others,
I am finding that these posts are very helpful and
an enjoyable means (with one notable exception!) to exchange
ideas such as the one that came up today in my team teaching
experience. My primary goal is to learn how others view these
sorts of issues and I am
I am very curious to see if *ANYONE* can offer me a reason
why we need to balance the budget given the cost associated
with balancing it? I have not yet seen a single argument
for balancing the budget that was not easily refuted! If
there are any conservative lurkers out there on this mailing
Dear Pen-econers
I am quite curious as to why the SL bailout must cost
anything? It seems to me that when loans go bad what is really
happening is that money is destroyed from the economy; nevertheles
s
the assets are still in existence. If this is the case
why cant
the federal
Help a poor fool out please, what is "setting mail digest"? What
exactly does this do?
Thank you
Loren Rice
Dear Cathy
I have the Ph.D. and have never heard of this economist
either. Further
intellectualy history is not such that anyone
"locates the precise point where" anyone goes wrong. Sounds like
some sort of onesided idea that should not come from the library
of congress.
Loren Rice
Dear List members:
I have a proposal for a constitutional amendment that seems to
make more sense than any of the proposed legislation currently
before our Federal Government. (This should not come as a shock)
Without further ado here it is:
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT:
It shall
Dear Alan
In response to your question, "Why higher education?"
I would argue that higher education is the key to keeping
people from needing to be put in prison. It is quite clear
to me that we do not currently have a highly educated
prison population; in fact, I believe that I have
Hi everyone:
It's been a while and I dont remember how to subscribe
to the list and a friend of mine wants to. Can anyone help out?
Loren Rice
Dear listmembers
It seems to me that the Federal Reserve is once again
operating under assumptions that may have been valid in years
past, in this case decades past, that are no longer valid. If
you will remember the Federal Reserve did this in the early
1980s when they should have
Dear Doug
'
Unfortunately this is simply a hypothesis at this point
and therefore is not yet supported by clear statistical evidence.
Nonetheless, your point that service sector inflation has
grown much more stongly than other sectors offers some tangental
evidence that my hypothesis is
I am wondering if there are economist out there that support the
balanced budget amendment? If so could you please reply and tell
me why? Also
if you are against it could you explain why? I
think this group may want to address this issue from both a
theoretical and practical view. I hope
What will this do to the use of internet? Will this very large
increase in the number of users overwelm the hardware currently
in existence?
Recently I spoke with a rep. from Digital who predicted that the use
of the internet on a large scale basis as it is now moving towards
will destroy
18 matches
Mail list logo