"neil":
The LP acts as a political filter to keep escaping workers from fleeing
the Democrats
deceit and lies and building an anti-capitalist movement
Whenever I read stuff like this, I am drawn back to Trotsky's description
of the July Days, when Bolsheviks went out in the streets to try
It is true that Keynesianism was severely hit as a national strategy by
the
circumstances of the 70's and 80's when the rich social democratic
governments of the west were under economic attack from newly developing
countries. But that does not mean that Keynesian (or for Doug's sake,
o! come on..
You folks still continue to see the political spectrum divided between
"liberals" and "conservatives" in the US. Liberal is left; conservative
is right. This distinction is FALSE, FALSE, FALSE! Even the political
discourse of conservatism has a liberal flavour to it,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somebody has
mentioned that Nader supports reproductive freedoms thus he is
progressive. What a big diffence? so does George Bush, so do
neo-conservatives, so do libertarians...
Really? http://www.gallup.com/poll/indicators/indabortion.asp.
Doug
YOU ARE GIVING ME
Confessions
Mine
I always like to choose my bullshits, myself, but I'm a known liberal.
Doug
Carrol, my e-mail system sucks nowadays, so some of pen-l messages
have suddenly disappeared. Some of them don't even reach to my current
address and bounce back.I will be transferred to a new system soon. If i
am not mistaken, you were talking about the following:
I did not say that capitalism
Jim Devine writes:
Given the world-wide competitive effort by capitalists and their
governments to push wages down relative to labor productivity, it's
quite
possible that capitalism will collapse, in the sense that it did in the
1930s. But such a collapse eventually creates forces that
Carrol, look! please! I have been following the discussions with
amazement here! "Eco-fascism" is a mistakenly directed ad hominem-- an
unfortunate mischarecterization, to justify the eco-fascism of capitalism
and the demands of the mainstream environmental movement. Association of
socialist
I agree with Mark here. JD sounds like a reformist who does not want to
see the ongoing crisis of capitalism. The keynesian demand side policies
of the 1930s and the class alliences it formed in order to manage the
economy did not solve the fundamental conflicts between the capitalist and
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Alan Spector" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "PROGRESSIVE SOCIOLOGISTS NETWORK" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "WORLD
SYSTEMS NETWORK" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2000 12:13 AM
Subject: Re: Gore, Bush and another Gulf War?
The
Instead, you should feel proud of yourself...
Mine
Brad De Long wrote:
There can be no doubt. Now we neoclassicals can reveal the truth:
Henwood is one of *us* now...
I'm not sure whether to feel exonerated or to call my shrink.
Doug
--
Mine Aysen Doyran
PhD Student
Department of
Emilio
Apocalypse Now
By Alfredo Molano B.
The Anti-Narcotics Brigade, in a victory march, will open door after door in
Putumayo and Caqueta so that Carlos Castano's troops can, in Mrs. Albright's
words "extend democracy to the south". EL ESPECTADOR Sunday, 25 June 2000
o la la.. Jay Hanson's energy list serv? never been to, but it must be
interesting. Jay is a phenomenal guy personality wise. Three basic ideas
he subscribes to in every occasion I have been to: 1) genetic roots of
authoritarianism 2)inherent destructiveness of human nature 3)
inevitability of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what are you trying to prove with your insults Doug? are you implying
the
impossibility of a socialist agenda? who is fantasizing here?
Ok, so you don't have any idea what changes are necessary in the
actual structures of production and consumption. All that's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what are you trying to prove with your insults Doug? are you implying
the
impossibility of a socialist agenda? who is fantasizing here?
Ok, so you don't have any idea what changes are necessary in the
actual structures of production and consumption. All that's required
Be very careful. The population of the rich grows in two ways: (i)
the rich have lots of children, and (ii) the poor become rich...
do you know that african american women are sterilized at a
significantly higher rate than white women? (according to our sociologist
friend,Andy Austin, 3-4
Louis Proyect wrote:
Mark Jones' alleged raising of the overpopulation question leads us
once
again into a discussion of the Marxist critique of Malthus. I would
refer
PEN-L'ers to Michael Perelman's "Marx's Crises Theory: Scarcity, Labor
and
Finance",
Lou, I agree with the rest of your
Mark,
I have been watching your sarcasmic criticisms with enthusiasm for two
days. You F many on the list left and right. What can I say? I really
admire your sense of humor. Marxists are generally known to be cool
people. You are truly sarcastic!
sarcastically,
Mine
A mainstream source on environmental regulation..
Mine
Volume 2, Review 1, 1996
http://csf.colorado.edu/wsystems/jwsr.html
ISSN 1076-156X
World Resources Institute. WORLD RESOURCES 1994-95: A GUIDE TO
THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT. New York: Oxford University
Journal of World-Systems Research
Volume 3, Number 3 (Fall 1997)
http://csf.colorado.edu/wsystems/jwsr.html
ISSN 1076-156X
World-system Studies of the Environment
by
I have found myself in agreement with Lou's recent post suggesting that
the roots of ecological crisis and overpopulation pressures lie in the
contradictions of capitalism, and that a socialist revolution is not
only necessary but also desirable if we are to have a sustainable
ecological system
ops, here is the article...
Mine
Journal of World-Systems Research
Volume 3, Number 3 (Fall 1997)
http://csf.colorado.edu/wsystems/jwsr.html
ISSN 1076-156X
Position in the World-System and National Emissions of
this article is huge. my system does not allow me to send it. here is the
web address. I did not attach it to my previous post...
Mine
Journal of World-Systems Research
Volume 3, Number 3 (Fall 1997)
http://csf.colorado.edu/wsystems/jwsr.html
ISSN
Journal of World-Systems Research
Volume 3, Number 3 (Fall 1997)
http://csf.colorado.edu/wsystems/jwsr.html
ISSN 1076-156X
Position in the World-System and National Emissions of
Greenhouse Gases*
_World Bank Development_ news summarizes ILO report!
Mine
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 16:53:09
-0700 (PDT) From: David Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
world-system network [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ILO REPORT SAYS
GLOBALIZATION CAUSES JOB LOSSES (fwd)
This
what are you trying to prove with your insults Doug? are you implying the
impossibility of a socialist agenda? who is fantasizing here? nobody is
suggesting a _blue print_ for the future, as far as I can tell. Marx did
not suggest either. Politics is a day to day struggle and what we can do
is
Not an appropriate comparison. Consider rather the way in which Broca
the founder of neurology wasted so much of his life and twisted his own
scientific discoveries by his attempts to prove that women's brains
weighed less than men's brains.
Carrol
We don't even need to turn to Broca.
Mark Jones wrote:
Mine,
Of course Bartlett is not a Marxist. That only adds weight to his
central
conclusion, which is about thew terminally unsustainable nature of
capitalist crisis and not about population growth (don't get
sidetracked
into wasting time on his *opinions* about that; it's
From a Marxist piont of view, Steven Rosenthal comrade responds to
defenders of over-population thesis, one them being, I may include,
_Bartlett._..
Mine
- I agree with most of what Andy and Mine have said during the debate
about population. The problems of the world today are due to
Be very careful. The population of the rich grows in two ways: (i)
the rich have lots of children, and (ii) the poor become rich...
do you know that african american women are sterilized at a significantly
higher rate than white women? (according to our sociologist friend,
Andy Austin, 3-4
Yes, Mark, I am "twitching" my ass on a "library stool" because some
magical person mentioned that population growth rate "must drop to zero"
and made himself clear that the _US government_ should adjust its
population accordingly. Yes, I am still twitching my ass because the same
magical person
Michael! how can you say this? I am not saying you mean it, but isn't it a
racist common sense that, for example, Mexicans damage the environment
more so regulary than white people, or let's say, from a capitalist point
of view, working classes are less responsible towards environment than the
Anyone who has any doubts at all about the utter unsustainability of
modern
world capitalism and the onset of terminal crisis, should read Albert
Bartlett's original article on the meaning of exponential growth,
archived
at:
http://www.npg.org/reports/bartlett_index.htm
Below is Bartlett's
In a message dated 6/24/00 2:33:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bebel, like Kautsky, was a social democrat. Zetkin, like Luxemburg,
was a
socialist. Their approach to _Woman Question_ differed accordingly.
Both Z and L criticized the party line orthodoxy represented by
Justin repeats my comments:
I have and do. Alison, who is a friend of mine, btw, would be
disappointed if you took the lesson from her book that Firestone doesn't
count, and indeedd, has nothing to teach historical materialists, or
isn't one in her way.
I did *not* say that Firestone did
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Radical feminists do not find them perfect either. That being said,
however, they were the ones who first raised the question of Women in
Marxism
Clara Zetkin and Rosa Luxemburg would also be surprsied to hear
it took Shulamith Firestone to raise The Woman Question in
http://home.sol.no/~hmelberg/els1b.htm
[Elster, Jon (1982), Marxism, Functionalism, and Game Theory: The Case
for Methodological Individualism, Theory and
Society 11:453-482]
http://home.sol.no/~hmelberg/ar82mfgt.htm
MARXISM, FUNCTIONALISM, AND GAME THEORY
The Case for Methodological
Elster further continues his misrepresentation and functionalist reading
of Marx:
Elsewhere Marx states that "insofar as it is the coercion of capital
which
forces the great mass of society to this [surplus labour] beyond its
immediate needs, capital creates culture and exercises an historical
well." _Considerations of Representative Government_, read (against
the grain) as description of liberal democracy and not as an apologia
of it, beautifully summarizes what it is.
Yoshie
good point Yoshie, but this is what "liberal democracy" is all about, so
_Considerations of
And it seems to me likely that Harriet Taylor had more fun than Jenny
von
Westphalen...
No use pretending Marx was as sensitive a feminist as Mill (although the
former was well ahead of the pack in this regard),
Rob.
J. S. Mill and Harriet Taylor are the architects of what came to be
known as
Dear Doyle,
Those jerks deserve more than I said, but I just felt like not throwing
gas to the fire any longer. As always, I am very much appreciated by your
supportive remarks and sincere comments, and will continue the struggle
against those unjustly attacking people!
in solidarity,
Mine
I apologize for this private correspondence. I really thought I sent this
to Doyle's address, and somehow it mistakenly went to the list.
sorry again..
Doyle sorry! I did not do it on purpose...
Mine Doyran
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 21:28:52 EDT
From:
Can someone please comment on whether or not the following is correct?
The meaning of the expression "political economy", as it is used
today, is not identical with the meaning of the expression "political
economy", as it was used by Marx and his contemporaries.
Gert, _political economy_ is
Ron Chilcote has edited a new volume titled "The
Political Economy of Imperialism: Critical Appraisals"
Boston: Kluwer Academic (1999), 260 pp. isbn
0-7923-8470-9.
The table of contents contributors:
Part I. SImperialism: Its Legacy and Contemporary
Significance
M.C. Howard and J.E. King,
funny, like other religious followers of neo-classical bourgeois ideology,
Elster, in _Making Sense of Marx_, attempts to demonstrate that Marx was
indeed a founder of rational choice. I am sure Ricardo was the father of
socialism then... No No Marx was indeed a spy..
Mine Doyran SUNY/Albany
M. Hoover wrote:
I had grad school prof who thought it'd be really good idea for me to
read, in addition to Smith, some other 18th century Scottish political
economists such as Adam Ferguson, James Steuart. If memory serves,
Steuart's book _Inquiry into Principles of Political Economy_
I don't think that we should continue this unproductive debate about who
is who. Ronald Chilcote is well known to be an _established_ Marxist
scholar. Actually, in his book, he _vehemently_ criticizes mainstream
social theories, including game theory and rational choice as well as
those who
Joe wrote:, Regarding utopianism, I thought regaining some semblance of
vision was all the rage on the Left these days. I realize there remains
a great deal of self-consciousness regarding these speculations.
Immanuel Wallerstein actually invented a new word, "Utopistics," to
provide cover for
Pat Devine is a market socialist. Market socialism is an attempt to
establish socialism in a capitalist economy. It is an attempt to reconcile
the irreconcilable. Market socialists treat market ahistorically,
abstracting it from its capitalist and historical content. Recently,
market
okey,I have to respond to this. I did not say that Marx personally
debated with James Mill.I know that James was dead before Marx was up.
Merci. I said that Marx wrote a short article called _On James Mill_,
which you can find in in McL's Marx: Political Writings...
Mine
the Philosophical
Dear Doyle, in polemics concerned with red-baiting Marxism, the term
"jerk" is used in a way to stigmatize the people on the Marxist left.
Additionally, it serves the religious purposes of classifying them as
dogmatic. The term dogma refers to religious convinction or faith.
Associating Marxism
Sometimes, it is interesting to follow the "orientation" of discussion
taking place in this list. The intellectual ranks of _Analytical Marxism_
include people like Cohen, Elster, Przeworski, Roemer and Olin Wright.
It is increasingly becoming hard for me to understand how one criticizes
Bill, thanks very much for the citations, particularly Brewer's book
(I was almost ignoring his work).
List(s), I am thinking at the moment about the possible ways of
operationalizing "finance capitalism".
I have similar questions about finance capital, as they relate to
whether Canada is
Peter Dorman and Robin Hahnel are very progressive,
I made some inquiry on Peter Dorman. He does not look like an ideologue,
but he does not look *very* progressive either. I read a speech by him
called "Economic Costs" of something presented in a rountable discussion.
Dorman was suggesting
Lou, you have hit the heart of the matter once again!
Unfortunately, the equation of game theory+utopian socialism produces such
results...
Mine
Regarding Hahnel, I may call him progressive, but what he challenges is
not terribly clear to me, especially his attack at Marx in the name of
Just to open a small parenthesis here. I was in fact criticizing Dorman
and Hahnel againist the claim that they were progressive. I don't wanna be
associated with the folks, or the imperialist agency of American
orientalism--American University--Hahnel is a part of. The first sentence
does not
then you should follow the list closely, Micheal, as a
moderator. If people have done implicitly racist comments in the past,
they should be reminded not to repeat the same mistake again! If you think
there is no such a comment, then you should go and read the archieves of
the list, which is
G'day Mine,
G'day...
I wrote:
Altruism has a pragmatic connotation in cooperative game theory. You give
in order to receive. As Richard Dawkins wrote in _Selfish Gene_, the book
that is a prototype of fascism and sexism, men compete to fuck women in
order to transfer their superior genes to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I say zero tolerance
for racist use of language!
Zero tolerance? I love it when Marxists try to sound like Rudy Giuliani.
Doug
himm??? Are you confusing me with someonelse?
Mine
GT is methodologically on the right. Period. The reason for this is
that the attention to micro foundations through rational choice, game
theoric models and formal modeling of neo-classical economics have
tended to obscure the importance of relations of production and the
exploitative
The argument that evil is not in the "economist but in the technique"
misses the point since it assumes that the technique of game theory is
neutral,
Would you consider, first, going and reading something that Matthew
Rabin has actually written?
Why don't you enlighten us about the hero's
MD wrote: The argument that evil is not in the "economist but in the
technique" misses the point since it assumes that the technique of game
theory is neutral, just as it assumes that economists are neutral.
But Rod did not assume that economists are neutral. Nor did I. Again, I
think that
*You* *definetly* ARE with your energetic support for socio-biology and
praising people like Wilson who called Ruandan people barbaric creatures
and genetically ill people!
Mine
Jim is now the third person that has been called a racist, by our new
champion name caller.
Mine wrote:
you are
Chris, your articles really help a lot, especially at the
conceptualization stage. I will check them out tomorrow. Actually, I was
just reading Christian Marazzi's article, published in _Zerowork_, Fall
1977, under the title "Money in the World Crisis: The New Basis of
Capitalist power".
Which is why people preach him, and give such people grants game
theorization of economics has unfortunately imperialized other fields of
social sciences too. sorry, i am waging a total war against game theory.
it is an intellectual establishment designed to perpetuate the ideology of
Rob, you may wish to consider Ronal Chilcote's _Theories of Comparative
Politics: The Search for a Paradigm Reconsidered_, for an excellent
critique of game theory and methodology of mainstream social sciences.
(Westview Press, 1994)..The book presents a critique of modernization
theory, game
well, actually, some people, were bombastically praising the man's work a
couple of posts ago. It is not a novel thing to see that people update
their arguments according to the member composition of the list...
Mine
Good point Jim. "Cooperative game theory" is just another bullshit cover
You can not understand the antogonism to game theory, because you are
blind to ideology behind it:
"Game theory and formal modeling have generated mathemetical explanations
of strategies, especially for marketing adn advertising in business
firms.Game theory has had an impact on economics and
The argument that evil is not in the "economist but in the technique"
misses the point since it assumes that the technique of game theory is
neutral, just as it assumes that economists are neutral. While I
respectfully say that this is A bullshit, I think that the very
assumptions of game
Apologies for cross-posting...
List(s),
I am thinking at the moment about the possible ways of operationalizing
"finance capitalism". The literature I have read up to now develops
a sociological formulation of the concept from the vantage points of
international political economy and world
I do *not* remember getting this message because my account was
full so Brad's question probably bounced back. Can you repost the
rest of your post?
Chris, I understand what you say but the article is not suggesting that
the world economy is charecterized by monopoly capitalism.
This not my
But this sends you down the road that Franz Neumann went down in his
_Behemoth_ interpetation of Nazism: that the Nazis would never
exterminate
the Jews because they needed to keep them around as an object of
collective hate lest the masses turn against their rulers and bosses.
I don't remember
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 21:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: world-system network [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ADB Annual Meeting (Chiang Mai) (fwd)
This might be of interest...
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 15
himm.. what is the deal with McArhur grant?
Mine
this fellow got a McArthur grant yesterday. Anybody know of him?
Matthew Rabin
Professor of Economics
University of California, Berkeley
"Collective pathology" is a politically suspect term to accept.
Not only it has been strategically used to label and criminalize certain
races (so called _backward, irrational, non- white peoples_), but also
been instrumental in safeguarding the ideology of racism for the benefit
of American
Walker wrote:
Ideology? Racism? Jingoism? Your own terminology tacitly accepts some
kind of collective determination of consciousness. The next step is to
acknowledge that, e.g., racism is dysfunctional for the racist as well as
for the victim. Nothing that I've said implies a genetic etiology.
Is this a claim that Algerian standards of living would rise by 47%
if Algeria were to shut off all trade with the rest of the world, and
that standards of living in Zimbabwe would rise by 56% if Zimbabwe
were to shut off all trade with the rest of the world?
The author himself writes in the
He used _relative surplus value_ and _absolute surplus value_..
aren't these parts of LTV by definition?
Mine
Brad, Marx's theory of value is not nearly as mechanistic as you make it
out to be. In fact, he never used the term, LTV. Meek and Dobb and some
other interpreters presented the LTV
"Collective pathology" is a politically suspect term to accept.
Not only it has been strategically used to label and criminalize certain
races (so called _backward, irrational, non- white peoples_), but also
been instrumental in safeguarding the ideology of racism for the benefit
of American
Michael, don't get me wrong, but why are you so dense? You sound like an
authoritarian father. don't discuss this! don't discuss that! shut up! why
don't you let the river flow instead? I think people should be
reminded if they misrepresent certain realities, and this is, naturally,
the part of
Tom Walker wrote:
things. Redeploying the clinical diagnostic terms from their use as
labels for individuals to a broader critique of collective pathology is
about as far from "anti-disabled thinking" as I can imagine.
"Collective pathology" is a politically suspect term to accept.
Not ony
Micheal Parelman posted on pen-l:
ECONOMISTS
struggling to make
sense of the American
economy agree about
some big things.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 02:54:54 -0400
From: Mine Aysen Doyran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The Long Twentieth Century
Review, Giovanni Arrighi, _The Long Twentieth Century_
(Verso, 1994)
by Immanuel Wallerstein
Book reviewed:
Gary Gereffi and Miguel Korzeniewicz, eds.
COMMODITY CHAINS AND GLOBAL CAPITALISM. Westport,
Connecticut: Praeger, 1994. xiv + 334 pp. ISBN
0-313-28914-X, $59.95 (hardcover); ISBN
0-275-94573-1, $22.95 (paper).
Reviewed by
Wilma A.
M. Parelman wrote:
The forces tending to increase competition in the United States were
deregulation, as Jim mentioned, and the pressure from imports. The
forces
tending to diminish competition were intellectual property, mergers, and
possibly government contracting. In fact, as Jim seemed
AVIVA
Womens World-Wide Web
FREE Monthly Webzine
http://www.aviva.org
Finalists in the OneWorld Media Awards 2000
Press Release: June 2000
http://www.aviva.org/press.htm
* ACTION ALERT:
Burma: Fears for Safety of Aung San Suu Kyi
Chile: Gladys: - Please Help My Children
*INTERNATIONAL
I have a graduate student doing research on Cuba-US relations after the
end
of the Cold War. Can anyone suggest some good material in journals,
books
or the web? I teach in North Cyprus, and our library has very limited
resources, so I would appreciate any information on resources available
Somebody was asking info about auto-industry a few days ago.
As I was surfing over the net, I accidently found these articles in
_Journal of World System Research_. I don't know if this is
still useful for your purposes:
"International Division of Labor and Global Economic Process: An Analysis
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 15:45:53 +0200 (MEST)
From: Stephen Cullenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CFP: MARXISM 2000 -- extended deadline 15 July
RETHINKING MARXISM announces its fourth
International Gala Conference
MARXISM 2000
References to hermeneutics and deconstruction don't convince me. I've
never
been into that kind of lit crit sh*t. I prefer logic, empirical
research,
and the philosophy of science (methodology).
If there would be a philosophy or literature person here, s(he) would
*really* be pissed, not
I'm not sure what that has to do with literary criticism (which is
basically supposed to help us understand the fiction we read). It is true
that the meaning of a theory varies with context, but that says we have
to
be very clear by what _we_ mean by the theory. The sociology or
psychology
Justin,
Please see my reply to Tom Walker where I both criticize hermeneutics and
empiricism.
btw, to my knowledge, Richard Rorty has nothing do with left. He is a new
pragmatic following the footsteps of Dewey...
thanks,
Mine
Mine,
I am actually a "philosophy person"--used to be a
Tom Walker wrote:
I second the endorsement for Ricoeur but wouldn't disdain Gadamer.
In general, my point was that both of them were not perfect either.One
does not need to be *empricist* to criticize hermeneutics.Empricism alone
does not guarentee radical science, as such it is an
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 00:27:31 -0400
From: Mine Aysen Doyran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: "The Heritage of Sociology, The Promise of Social Science"
For those who think sociology is not a science or has very little
theoretical
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 00:33:42 -0400
From: Mine Aysen Doyran [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The Racist Albatross: Social Science, [iso-8859-9] Jörg Haider, and Widerstand
http://fbc.binghamton.edu/iwvienna.htm
"The Racist Albatross:
After you pressed the reply button??
Mine
okay. Just send me a check and I'll sign it. Also, sorry to the list: I
thought that this was going only to Susan.
At 11:43 AM 6/6/00 -0400, you wrote:
Jim,
That would be great if we could fly all book contributors out, but alack
alas, those
Justin wrote:
So what's y'alls point? The original Constitution enshrined slavery and
was in part designed to protect property owners. It was a bourgeois
document in an era of bourgeois revolution. After the more or less
completion of the bourgeois revolution in the civil war, a laissez faire
"Writing History"
http://fbc.binghamton.edu/iwchv-hi.htm
by Immanuel Wallerstein
[Key-text for Session on "Writing History," at the Colloquium on History
and Legitimisation, "[Re]constructing the Past," 24-27
February 1999, Brussels]
The problem about writing history can be seen in the
To be fair: Louis wrote and I agreed with him, since he wrote before me...
Just a small note...
Mine
Justin wrote:
Mine says, and Louis agrees with her:
If the writings of Marx and Lenin were misinterpreted to justifty
repression and stupidities, the blame should not be put on their
on 5/6/00 6:28 am, Anthony D'Costa at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could anyone suggest some "good" books on auto industry restructuring
globally that specifically ties it to (or discusses) excess
capacity? They could have been written any time since the late
1960s. Thanks in advance.
1 - 100 of 354 matches
Mail list logo
