>London Times   May 20 1998
>   
>   
>   A CONTROVERSIAL Bill to reduce the working week from 39 hours to 35
>   was passed by the French National Assembly yesterday in a move
>   described by many economists and business leaders as economic suicide.
____________________

This is a great news. I hope it gives strength to workers all around the
world to push for such a move. I'm wondering what would be it's impact on
general price level and so real wages per worker? Cheers, ajit sinha
>   
>   Dismissing protests that the law will harm competitiveness and
>   aggravate the migration of young professionals across the Channel, the
>   Socialist-led Assembly ratified the Government's election promise to
>   cut the working week without reducing wages by a show of hands.
>   Members of the governing coalition - Socialists, Communists and Greens
>   - voted for the Bill while the centre-right opposition voted against.
>   
>   The Bill had produced 75 hours of debate, with the Gaullists arguing
>   that it would have no effect on France's crippling unemployment levels
>   of around 12 per cent and might even increase joblessness. The
>   Government, however, claims that the measure will create between
>   210,000 and 280,000 extra jobs over five years.
>   
>   The measure was originally championed by Lionel Jospin, the Socialist
>   Prime Minister, as a way to reduce unemployment, although at one point
>   late last year even he appeared to back away from it, describing the
>   Left's election slogan "Work 35 hours get paid for 39" as
>   "anti-economic".
>   
>   Under the terms of the law, all firms with more than 20 employees must
>   introduce the 35-hour week by 2000. Firms with fewer than 20 workers
>   will be allowed until 2002 to implement the measure. More than 15
>   million workers are estimated to be affected.
>   
>   The law includes no details on how it should be implemented, leaving
>   management and trade unions to negotiate the terms. In 1999 practical
>   details will be set out, based on the experience of companies that
>   have adopted the measures in the interim.
>
>** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
>is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
>in receiving the included information for research and educational
>purposes. **
>
>
>
>-- 
>Michael Perelman
>Economics Department
>California State University
>Chico, CA 95929
>
>Tel. 530-898-5321
>E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



Reply via email to