Gar writes: 
>I don't know if this is true. If class, race, and gender can all be
>traced to some single root cause then we could use this root cause as
>base and the others as superstructure. 

I don't think anyone attributes race, class, and gender to the same "root
cause." Even Engels, in his book on the family didn't do so. In "the German
Ideology," Marx and Engels saw the family (with its enslavement of women)
as preceding capitalism in history. Etc. (_Who_ is it that engages in such
reductionism? I think that sometimes "crude Marxism" can be as much as a
strawMarx as PoMo often is.) 

I think the only reason one can see capitalism as the "root cause" of other
oppressive institutions is dynamic. Like a virus, capitalism continually
spreads, attacking preexisting institutions like racism and patriarchy and
either destroying them or, perhaps more likely, transforming them in a way
that fits its functioning. These institutions are conservative, rather than
being aggressively dynamic like capitalism. 

When attacked, the internal balance of racism and patriarchy between the
dominated and the dominant is upset.  In the 1940s and 1950s, the racist
domination of blacks by whites in the US was undermined by economic
developments (including WW2). This unleashed the civil rights movement,
which threatened the domination of the alliance of white racists and
capitalists. The movement was able to win important reforms, but there have
also been reverses as the capitalist/racist alliance struck back. Racist
institutions can help preserve the stability of capitalism (by dividing an
conquering workers) at the same time that capitalism can help preserve the
stability of racism (by splitting minority groups among classes). Of
course, any "equilibrium" attained is merely transitory, as capitalism,
with its dynamic of accumulate-to-compete and compete-to-accumulate
disrupts even its own status quo. 

There's a somewhat parallel analysis of patriarchy/capital relations, but I
lack the time to explain it.

Anyway, I'll leave further commentary to Angela.

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] &
http://clawww.lmu.edu/Faculty/JDevine/JDevine.html



Reply via email to