After I unconsciously channeled with Max Planck (thanks Larry!) 
to say that I thought that physics is easier than social science, 
Doug wrote:

>>Difficult? Don't know about that; it's a lot easier to be an 
amateur sociologist (or economist even!) than amateur quantum 
physicist. Less predictable, maybe.<<

It's the last meaning I was using. Physics is more predictable, 
meaning that the efforts to understand the world are easier. It 
is also easier to stuff into idealized mathematical models[*] 
without ultraviolence to the object of study. (Third, physicists 
can usually productively assume that they're not part of the 
object of their study.) Because of its relative predictability 
and the appropriateness of formalization, Physics has made much 
more progress (both empirically and mathematically) than any of 
the social sciences. This in turn means that there's much more to 
know to become a physicist, making amateur physics almost 
impossible.  

Doug continues:>> But your position, Jim, sounds quite the 
opposite of what Aronowitz and the social construction crowd 
argues. To them, the truth claims of the "hard" sciences are no 
different from those of the "soft" ones ...<<

I thought I already said I agree with them that I was willing to 
agree with Stanley A. that physics was subject to the criticism 
that its nature was deeply affected by the societal environment. 

For instance, though I really know nothing about physics, I would 
hypothesize that in bourgeois society, there is a certain 
ideological attraction of Newtonian physics -- with its image of 
atomistic billiard-ball interaction -- that delayed the 
development and acceptance of Einsteinian and quantum-mechanic 
physics, which put greater emphasis on interconnectedness. That 
would be an interesting question for an expert to look into... 
(Did Einstein's socialism open his mind in a way that helped him 
get beyond Newton? what was it that closed his mind to quantum 
physics?)

[*] "idealized mathematical models" is quite a redundant phrase, 
no?

in pen-l solidarity,

Jim Devine   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Econ. Dept., Loyola Marymount Univ.
7900 Loyola Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90045-8410 USA
310/338-2948 (daytime, during workweek); FAX: 310/338-1950
"Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way
and let people talk.) -- K. Marx, paraphrasing Dante A.

Reply via email to