Published on Wednesday, April 21, 2004 by CommonDreams.org
Bush Fails History...Jefferson Predicted Iraq
by Thom Hartmann

Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon thought they could bomb Vietnam into
accepting democracy. George W. Bush thinks he can do it with Iraq.

But the first American president to consider how best to grow
democracies - Thomas Jefferson - had some very different thoughts on the
issue. LBJ and Bush would have done well to listen to his thoughtful
words in a letter he wrote on February 14, 1815, to his old friend in
France, the Marquis de Lafayette.

Discussing the French Revolution, the Terror that followed, and the
reign of Napoleon, Jefferson noted that building democracy is an organic
process: The democracy movement in the colonies had been fermenting for
a century prior to Jefferson's birth.

"A full measure of liberty is not now perhaps to be expected by your
nation," Jefferson wrote, about the democracy movement within France,
"nor am I confident they are prepared to preserve it. More than a
generation will be requisite, under the administration of reasonable
laws favoring the progress of knowledge in the general mass of the
people, and their habituation to an independent security of person and
property, before they will be capable of estimating the value of
freedom, and the necessity of a sacred adherence to the principles on
which it rests for preservation."

He added that it's nearly impossible to force democracy on a people, and
the consequences of trying could be disastrous. "Instead of that liberty
which takes root and growth in the progress of reason, if recovered by
mere force or accident, it becomes, with an unprepared people, a tyranny
still, of the many, the few, or the one."

Lafayette, at the time of the French Revolution (1789), had expressed
his concerns to Jefferson that the movement for democracy wasn't
sufficiently widespread among the average people in France to take hold
as it had in America, and they should thus make the transition via a
constitutional monarchy much like today's United Kingdom. At the time,
Jefferson had disagreed with his friend, but in this 1815 letter, he
noted: "And I found you were right.... Unfortunately, some of the most
honest and enlightened of our patriotic friends...did not weigh the
hazards of a transition from one form of government to another."

Many in the revolutionary movement of France of that era opposed
Lafayette's deliberate and careful push for an organic democracy, rather
than a sudden lurch. "You differed from them," Jefferson noted. "You
were for stopping there, and for securing the Constitution which the
National Assembly had obtained. Here, too, you were right; and from this
fatal error of the republicans, from their separation from yourself and
the constitutionalists, in their councils, flowed all the subsequent
sufferings and crimes of the French nation."

The lack of a truly widespread, average-citizen-based movement for
democracy in France, Lafayette had privately argued to Jefferson two
decades earlier, could simply lead to a transition from the tyranny of
the king to another, perhaps worse, form of tyranny. While Jefferson
had, at first, embraced the French revolution, in his letter to
Lafayette he confessed that he had now come to agree that without a
broader base of support, a sudden change of government was a disaster,
and the primary beneficiaries would only be war profiteers and the rich,
Frenchmen who were so opposed to democracy that they could even be
called foreigners.

Thus, Jefferson wrote, "The foreigner gained time to anarchize by gold
the government he could not overthrow by arms, to crush in their own
councils the genuine republicans... and to turn the machine of
Jacobinism from the change to the destruction of order; and, in the end,
the limited monarchy they had secured was exchanged for the unprincipled
and bloody tyranny of Robespierre, and the equally unprincipled and
maniac tyranny of Bonaparte."

Comparing France to America, Jefferson noted how - unlike France - we
had overthrown an external occupier all by ourselves. For American
colonists, the repression and occupation of the English in the Colonies
"has helped rather than hurt us, by arousing the general indignation of
our country, and by marking to the world of Europe the vandalism and
brutal character of the English government. It has merely served to
immortalize their infamy."

And now Arab leaders like Egypt's Mubarak say that, across the Arab
world, our infamy is being immortalized by Bush's unprovoked invasion
and occupation of oil-rich Iraq. America, Mubarak says, faces "a hatred
never equaled" in the Middle East, even as Iraq totters on the edge of
civil war.

It's as if the cycles of history are repeating themselves, and Iraq may
now suffer the Terrors that racked France in the 19th Century.

When John Adams wrote to Jefferson on July 13, 1813 about a French
politician, he could just as easily have been speaking of George W.
Bush: "In plain truth, I was astonished at the grossness of his
ignorance of government and history."

Adams added, speaking of those who think they can create empire and have
a stable rule purely by military force, "Napoleon has lately invented a
word which perfectly expresses my opinion, at that time and ever since.
He calls the project Ideology; and... it was all madness."

But like Iraq with Saddam, Jefferson wrote that true democracy would
take time in France because the overthrow of a tyrant had been done so
hastily. "You are now rid of him, and I sincerely wish you may continue
so. But this may depend on the wisdom and moderation of the restored
dynasty. It is for them now to read a lesson in the fatal errors of the
republicans; to be contented with a certain portion of power, secured by
formal compact with the nation, rather than, grasping at more, hazard
all upon uncertainty, and risk meeting the fate of their
predecessor...."

As we "hazard all upon uncertainty" in the Middle East, Iraq is proving
the prescience of our greatest presidents yet again. As Franklin D.
Roosevelt said on September 22, 1936, "In the truest sense, freedom
cannot be bestowed, it must be achieved."

If only George W. Bush had paid attention during his study of history at
Yale...

Thom Hartmann (thom at thomhartmann.com) is an award-winning
best-selling author and the host of a nationally syndicated daily talk
radio show. www.thomhartmann.com. His most recent book is titled "We The
People: A Call To Take Back America," and his newest book, based on
Jefferson's writings, "A Return To Democracy: Reviving Jefferson's
Dream," will be released on July 4th by Random House/Crown.

Reply via email to