At 09:40 AM 9/5/2002 -0700, Eugene Coyle wrote:
The current Galbraith piece is appealing, but professors need a more
concrete road
map at this point -- his level of abstraction sets the stage, but what to
actually do?
I dunno about this - even as an abstract map, I don't find Galbraith's
I have been reading the exchange. I was most impressed by the essay that triggered the
debate.
The Deirdre McCloskey piece in the current issue seems to me to be defensive and
missing
the point. I think I could pass the test he poses at the end -- I did have the Stigler
book as my
Anyone else following the post-autism debate over the role of
microeconomics and game theory in economics curricula? What do folks think
of this? The latest Post-Autistic Review has short pieces by McCloskey and
Galbraith - Solow and and Blanchard had taken shots at the Post-Autistic
petition
