That, of course, would be impossible. Instead, I apply a somewhat rigid him,
somewhat arbitrary judgment. That is the best that can do.
--
Michael Perelman
My experience with rigid hims has been mixed. The last time I applied a
rigid him on the Marxism list, it led to anonymous obscene phone
Voice recognition, early in the morning, makes for wonderful poetry.
Louis Proyect wrote:
That, of course, would be impossible. Instead, I apply a somewhat rigid him,
somewhat arbitrary judgment. That is the best that can do.
--
Michael Perelman
My experience with rigid hims has been
I agree. I've seen him some people, for example Max and Lou, say the most
insulting things to each other, but with with an underlying sense of humor.
. . .
Actually I was laughin' on the outside
but cryin' on the inside.
mbs
ohh, nothing "personal", indeed. I was just making a general observation..
I have seen worse cases like "why don't you play your Alpha male show?"
It seems to me "veiled personal affronts" are more effective ways of
making one's point than "direct" and "open" affronts.. they can be
sometimes
Max, I will try to be more sensitive next time.
Max Sawicky wrote:
Actually I was laughin' on the outside
but cryin' on the inside.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings Economists,
Mine writes in response to Michael Perelman warning Carrol Cox about his
speech toward Louis Proyect,
Mine,
A lot of people use in this list the word "bullshit". why? is it a way
of stressing out? or a part of common language?
last month on wsn, we had a *crazy*
