re infants with
disabilities.
Cheers, Ken Hanly
- Original Message -
From: Doyle Saylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]I
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 7:55 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:32388] Re: Re: Birds of a feather
Greetings Economists,
Peter Dorman writes,
There was an article
In his first paragraph, Easterbrook reveals he hasn't read Singer, but
rather the people who write about Singer. Given his rather loose
standards of intellectual accountability (also revealed in his past
writings on environmental issues), his endorsement of this latest book
is of little
How did you conclude that Easterbrook hasn't read Singer?
Peter Dorman wrote:
In his first
paragraph, Easterbrook reveals he hasn't read Singer, but rather the people
who write about Singer. Given his rather loose standards of intellectual
accountability (also revealed in his past writings
Singer doesn't take the positions Easterbrook has attributed to him.
You don't have to agree with Singer (I often don't) to appreciate this.
There was an article in the Chronicle of Higher Ed about a year ago
that was fair-minded, I thought, on Singer and his critics. The man is
not a
In a message dated 11/19/02 8:27:15 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(Sooner or later it had to happen. Peter Singer, an "animal rights
leftist," who also argues that handicapped children should be killed for
their own good, has written a new book promoting globalization in
Greetings Economists,
Peter Dorman writes,
There was an article in the Chronicle of Higher Ed about a year ago
that was fair-minded, I thought, on Singer and his critics. The man is
not a monster...
Doyle,
Writings on an Ethical Life, Peter Singer, Harper Collins books, 2000,
page 163,
We might
