mplex that needs
North Korea as a "rogue state" to justify the NMD.
Barkley Rosser
- Original Message -
From: "Brad DeLong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 1:07 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:9451] Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (
ject: [PEN-L:9458] Re: Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (was: ergonomics,
etc.
> Can Bush be any worse for the rest of the world than Clinton/Gore?
> If so in what way. Will the civilians of Yugoslavia and Iraq be any
> less fearful of their lives? Will the peasants of Columbia be more
>
e sent: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 15:02:05 -0500
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Priority: Normal
Subject: [PEN-L:9466] Re: Re: Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (was:
ergonomics, etc.
> A healthy US economy would benefit the world's poor. A Gore
> Adm
Comments are after different sections
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
, etc.
> A healthy US economy would benefit the world's poor. A Gore
> Administration would been far more deft in its handling of the current
> economic crisis. They would have brought in p
A healthy US economy would benefit the world's poor. A Gore
Administration would been far more deft in its handling of the current
economic crisis. They would have brought in people with actual civil
service experience, for example. Fiscal policy is a good concrete
example. Reduced taxation on mid
Can Bush be any worse for the rest of the world than Clinton/Gore?
If so in what way. Will the civilians of Yugoslavia and Iraq be any
less fearful of their lives? Will the peasants of Columbia be more
fearful for their lives? Will Canadians fear more for the loss of their
jobs, pollution
>...the costs of not trying, which is what you recommend, are the
>same as the costs of failing.
You can think better than that.
First of all, there are lots of ways of trying which do *not* involve
handing elections and offices on a platter to the right-wing
candidate.
Second, the costs of
nce reform, social
justice etc...
- Original Message -
From: "Louis Proyect" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 12:16 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:9443] Re: Demicans or Repugnocrats (was: ergonomics, etc.
> Why do we have to rehash the qu
Why do we have to rehash the question of the two-party system? PEN-L'ers
have made up their minds on this question long ago. It seems to me that a
mailing list can best be used to provide new information that will people
to form their own opinions.
Louis Proyect
Marxism mailing list: http://www.m
