Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-06-02 Thread Charles Brown
h of those that overlap and intersect in complicated ways. Barkley Rosser -Original Message- From: Charles Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 3:52 PM Subject: [PEN-L:19760] Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology "J. Barkley Ross

Re: Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-06-01 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
[PEN-L:19781] Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology Barkley: My understanding of dialectic comes more from Hegel than from Engels, and I had always considered the idea of mutual determination as an important part of the dialectic. Do you have anything to say on that. Rod "J. Barkley Ross

Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-06-01 Thread Charles Brown
"J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/31/00 04:24PM Charles, In my paper I briefly discussed some of Engels' mathematical remarks. Some look prescient, some look curious, some are simply wrong. CB: Which examples are wrong ? ))

Re: Re: Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-06-01 Thread Rod Hay
Perhaps it is the translator's fault, but I have always found Engels' piece inpenetrable. Perhaps "interpenetration of opposites" does subsume "mutual determination." Rod "J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." wrote: Rod, I would interpret "interpenetration of opposites" as subsuming "mutual

Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-06-01 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
with Engels. Barkley Rosser -Original Message- From: Charles Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, June 01, 2000 3:06 PM Subject: [PEN-L:19800] Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology "J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/31/00 04:24P

Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-06-01 Thread Charles Brown
y, June 01, 2000 3:06 PM Subject: [PEN-L:19800] Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology "J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/31/00 04:24PM Charles, In my paper I briefly discussed some of Engels' mathematical remarks. Some look prescient, some look curious, s

Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-31 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
Charles, In my paper I briefly discussed some of Engels' mathematical remarks. Some look prescient, some look curious, some are simply wrong. One example he gave (not wrong) of the negation of the negation was how if one takes a derivative of an integral, one gets the original function

Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-31 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
Charles, Yes, I think that the interplay between chance and necessity in chaos theory has a distinctly dialectical aspect. I don't think I'll bite on the limit issue, although there certainly are discontinuities that could be viewed as dialectical that arise in such cases, e.g. in the

Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-30 Thread Charles Brown
"J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/25/00 11:27AM For those who are curious, I have a recently published paper on these issues. "Aspects of dialectics and non-linear dynamics," _Cambridge Journal of Economics_, May 2000, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 311-324. It is also available

Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-30 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
: Dialectical materialism and ecology "J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/25/00 11:27AM For those who are curious, I have a recently published paper on these issues. "Aspects of dialectics and non-linear dynamics," _Cambridge Journal of Economics_, May 2000

Re: Re: Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-30 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
Subject: [PEN-L:19761] Re: Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology "J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/25/00 11:27AM For those who are curious, I have a recently published paper on these issues. "Aspects of dialectics and non-linear dynamics," _Cambridge J

Re: Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-30 Thread Charles Brown
"J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/25/00 11:27AM For those who are curious, I have a recently published paper on these issues. "Aspects of dialectics and non-linear dynamics," _Cambridge Journal of Economics_, May 2000, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 311-324. It is also available on

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-29 Thread JKSCHW
In a message dated 5/26/00 3:15:23 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: No relation to Thurn und Thaxis, or whatever that thing from Pynchon's Lot 49 is. If Pynchon is right, everything is related to Thurn und Thaxis. But as a founder of Thaxis, I think I may have suggested

Re: Re: Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-26 Thread Chris Burford
At 08:44 25/05/00 -0700, Jim D wrote: I don't want to get into quote-mongering (or to rehearsing old debates from Marxism-thaxis -- BTW, what in 'ell is "thaxis"?) Marxism-thaxis is one of the life forms in virtual marxism-space, which had its own evolutionary history, birth, childhood,

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-26 Thread Jim Devine
At 08:05 AM 05/26/2000 +0100, you wrote: At 08:44 25/05/00 -0700, Jim D wrote: I don't want to get into quote-mongering (or to rehearsing old debates from Marxism-thaxis -- BTW, what in 'ell is "thaxis"?) Marxism-thaxis is one of the life forms in virtual marxism-space, which had its own

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-26 Thread Doug Henwood
Jim Devine wrote: but what is "thaxis"? I know what "praxis" is. Theory + practice = thaxis. No relation to Thurn und Thaxis, or whatever that thing from Pynchon's Lot 49 is. Doug

RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-26 Thread Max Sawicky
Jim Devine wrote: but what is "thaxis"? I know what "praxis" is. Theory + practice = thaxis. No relation to Thurn und Thaxis, or whatever that thing from Pynchon's Lot 49 is. Doug I thought it went back to the old saying, the only certain things are debt and thaxis. Or something like that.

Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-25 Thread Chris Burford
At 16:51 24/05/00 -0400, Charles Brown wrote: Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/24/00 04:27PM At 03:27 PM 5/24/00 -0400, you wrote: This means developing an appreciation for what Engels was trying to do in Dialectics of Nature and expanding upon it as well. I think too much noise has been

Re: Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-25 Thread J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
u/rosserjb. Barkley Rosser -Original Message- From: Chris Burford [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, May 25, 2000 3:39 AM Subject: [PEN-L:19551] Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology At 16:51 24/05/00 -0400, Charles Brown wrote: Jim Dev

Re: Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-25 Thread Jim Devine
Chris B. writes: I think he [Marx] clearly saw humans as on a continuum with the animals. (See his notes on Wagner) Modern biology and psychology are similar, seeing "shades of gray" between human (self-)consciousness (and self-self-consciousness) and the unconsciousness of zooplankton.

Re: Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-25 Thread Charles Brown
Chris Burford [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/25/00 03:37AM On this I would not quite agree with the following: Charles B: One other point, in class society alienation causes human history to become natural history-LIKE. I do not see that explanation anywhere in Marx, but I am open to interesting

Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-24 Thread Jim Devine
At 03:27 PM 5/24/00 -0400, you wrote: This means developing an appreciation for what Engels was trying to do in Dialectics of Nature and expanding upon it as well. I think too much noise has been made about the "dialectics of nature." That is, there's been too much criticism of Engels on this

Re: Dialectical materialism and ecology

2000-05-24 Thread Charles Brown
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/24/00 04:27PM At 03:27 PM 5/24/00 -0400, you wrote: This means developing an appreciation for what Engels was trying to do in Dialectics of Nature and expanding upon it as well. I think too much noise has been made about the "dialectics of nature." That is,