[PEN-L:9559] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.
> At 12:45 PM 3/26/01 -0500, you wrote:
> >They could overdo it. But, most people do not
> >even know what they are doing. It is a successful
> >stealth campaign so far.
>
> yeah, but I'm trying to intu
At 12:45 PM 3/26/01 -0500, you wrote:
>They could overdo it. But, most people do not
>even know what they are doing. It is a successful
>stealth campaign so far.
yeah, but I'm trying to intuit future trends.
> As for North Korea, they are probably right that
>the DPRK will not outright i
sage -
From: "Jim Devine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 12:13 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:9528] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.
> Barkley wrote:
> >... nobody should be under any illusions whatsoever. The Bush
> &
Barkley wrote:
>... nobody should be under any illusions whatsoever. The Bush
>administration is turning out to be far far worse than anybody forecast
>and certainly far worse than a Gore administration would have been. And it
>will negatively impact many people in the rest
>of the world, I am
the world which can just go to hell.
Barkley Rosser
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 2:35 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:9460] Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.
> Yea Doug, a typical American reply. It ain't us
1 1:48 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:9465] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.
>
> Yes, but in your reply to Doug's transparently sarcastic remark on
> Candaian innocence, you seem to be taking Doug as an ardent defender of US
> foreign policy...
> Doug's displeasure, if I
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 12:40:12 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Second, I would ask Doug why we shouldn't hope that the
>American working class doesn't get hammered into poverty,
>disease and death since they have been supporting governments
>and policies that have been prescribing such medicine
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 13:44:52 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>So Canadians are responsible for this? Get a life Doug. What the
>collapse of the American economy will do is discredit American
>imperialism through the rest of the world thereby improving the long
>run prospects of the rest of th
>
> Date sent:Sun, 25 Mar 2001 13:47:23 -0500
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Doug Henwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [PEN-L:9456] Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.
> Send reply to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yea Doug, a typical American reply. It ain't us, it is all you
> foreigners.
Hold it, now where did Doug say that? Not even close.
Doug writes,
> A couple of more questions occurred to me while I was in the shower.
> Do the 32 million members of the U.S. working class who live in
> officially defined poverty deserve their fate? Or worse? How about
> the 20-30 million more who live close to poverty? How about the - I'm
>
-0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Doug Henwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:[PEN-L:9456] Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Second, I would ask Doug why we s
he US. Kyoto, etc. the US record
is simply disgusting.
Paul Phillips
Date sent: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 13:53:12 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Doug Henwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:[PEN-L:9457] Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc.
Se
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Second, I would ask Doug why we shouldn't hope that the
>American working class doesn't get hammered into poverty,
>disease and death since they have been supporting governments
>and policies that have been prescribing such medicine for the rest
>of the world.
A couple
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Second, I would ask Doug why we shouldn't hope that the
>American working class doesn't get hammered into poverty,
>disease and death since they have been supporting governments
>and policies that have been prescribing such medicine for the rest
>of the world.
The more
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Second, I would ask Doug why we shouldn't hope that the
>American working class doesn't get hammered into poverty,
>disease and death since they have been supporting governments
>and policies that have been prescribing such medicine for the rest
>of the world.
While Can
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Doug Henwood wrote:
> Mark Laffey wrote:
>
> >What evidence is there that Nader voters were in fact potential Gore voters?
> >That is, is there any data to show that had Nader not been an option, the
> >people who voted for him would have voted for Gore? Surely that is the
Mark Laffey wrote:
>What evidence is there that Nader voters were in fact potential Gore voters?
>That is, is there any data to show that had Nader not been an option, the
>people who voted for him would have voted for Gore? Surely that is the
>correct question to ask. Nader voters may simply h
>But the idea that the left cannot be taken for granted is profoundly
>frightening to Dems.
And profoundly heart-gladdening for Republicans.
>The idea that we might be able to exercise real power is absolutely
>terrifying. If we are to put together a winning party, it means
>taking votes from
Hey, Mark, don't bother. The Demicans can't face up to the fact that they
lost because they ran like Repugs, as well as running a generally sorry,
suckass candidate who blew what should have been a sure thing, and they are
deeply resentful because they think they own the votes of the left. The
What evidence is there that Nader voters were in fact potential Gore voters?
That is, is there any data to show that had Nader not been an option, the
people who voted for him would have voted for Gore? Surely that is the
correct question to ask. Nader voters may simply have stayed at home rathe
> Except that Dubya is opposed to ergonomic rules. Nader is supposed to
> like them--but he likes being a publicity hound more...
>
>
> Brad DeLong
*
Apologies, Michael.
Brad, grow up. Your Ivy League edumakation is showing.
Ian
> >
>> And Nader was in their pitching, telling self-identified Democrats
>> not to vote for Gore...
>>
>>
>> Brad DeLong
>
>
>As was 'Dubya; welcome to the world of free speech.
>
>Ian
Except that Dubya is opposed to ergonomic rules. Nader is supposed to
like them--but he likes bein
> >>Brad DeLong wrote:
>>>
Yet another blessing we have received from Ralph Nader...
>>>
>>>No, from Al Gore. If as many self-identified Democrats had voted for
>>>Gore as self-identified Republicans voted for Bush, W would still be
>>>governor of Texas.
>>>
>>>Doug
>>
>>And Nader was in thei
Shane Mage wrote:
>Is it Nader's fault that the Gore-Clinton administration delayed,
>obviously with intention, the promulgation of regulations vitally
>important to working people, until their concessionary though fraudulent
>successor could undo them with a stroke of the pen?
no. Further, it
>>Brad DeLong wrote:
>>
>>>Yet another blessing we have received from Ralph Nader...
>>
>>No, from Al Gore. If as many self-identified Democrats had voted for
>>Gore as self-identified Republicans voted for Bush, W would still be
>>governor of Texas.
>>
>>Doug
>
>And Nader was in their pitching, t
>
> And Nader was in their pitching, telling self-identified Democrats
> not to vote for Gore...
>
>
> Brad DeLong
As was 'Dubya; welcome to the world of free speech.
Ian
>Brad DeLong wrote:
>
>>Yet another blessing we have received from Ralph Nader...
>
>No, from Al Gore. If as many self-identified Democrats had voted for
>Gore as self-identified Republicans voted for Bush, W would still be
>governor of Texas.
>
>Doug
And Nader was in their pitching, telling se
28 matches
Mail list logo
