Michael Perelman wrote:
Someone once proposed -- I think they pronounce it a law -- that once the
word Hitler appears in the debate all dialogue is finished.
goodwin's law?
---
http://members.tripod.com/~goodwin_2/law.html
Goodwin's Law of Usenet
Professor Goodwin, U of I,
Yes, that is it. As Gar suggested Lou is declared the semi-looser, since
the Stalin law has not yet been made official. What would Hitler say?
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 10:53:55AM -0400, ravi wrote:
goodwin's law?
---
http://members.tripod.com/~goodwin_2/law.html
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 10:53:55AM -0400, ravi wrote:
goodwin's law?
what has processor speed doubling every two years got to do with this?
dd
___
Email Disclaimer
This communication may contain confidential or privileged information and
Davies, Daniel wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 10:53:55AM -0400, ravi wrote:
goodwin's law?
what has processor speed doubling every two years got to do with this?
you can type nazi twice as fast? no, you are thinking of moore's
law. my apologies for non-progressive-economics content.
Title: RE: [PEN-L:29395] RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Stalinophobia
how about Godwin's law -- i.e., that there are no laws?
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
-Original Message-
From: Davies, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday
I don't see how inaccurate criticism (if that's what Rappaport did) of
FARC has anything to do with Stalin or Stalinophobia. FARC isn't Stalinist
or Stalinophilic, is it?
Of course it has something to do with hatred of Stalin. The FARC leaders
are all veteran Stalinists, but they never set
guaranteed flame bait???
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 08:45:09PM +, Justin Schwartz wrote:
I think Stalinophobia means an unreasonable refusal to support Milosovic
and an incorrect refusal to recognize that the Yugoslav regime from 1990-98
represented a last bastion of socialism. What this
It seems to me that attacking something called Stalinphobia is more
the flame bait.
Michael Perelman wrote:
guaranteed flame bait???
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 08:45:09PM +, Justin Schwartz wrote:
I think Stalinophobia means an unreasonable refusal to support Milosovic
and an incorrect
My comment is flamebait, and Jim's isn't. Care to explain? jks
From: Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:29369] Re: Stalinophobia
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 14:35:41 -0700
guaranteed flame bait???
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 08:45:09PM
]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:29369] Re: Stalinophobia
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> guaranteed flame bait???
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 08:45:09PM +, Justin Schwartz wrote:
> > I think "Stalinophobia" means an unreasonable refusal to support Mi
I think one can offer a definition of stalinophobia (and though I've
never heard the term used, of stalinophilia also). Both consist of the
assumption that labelling a political position Stalinist eliminates
the need for further thought. To avoid both it is also important not
even to accept
Someone once proposed -- I think they pronounce it a law -- that once the
word Hitler appears in the debate all dialogue is finished. If that idea
is a law, a Stalin corollary is warranted.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
- Original Message -
From: Michael Perelman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 7:24 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:29381] Re: Re: Re: Re: Stalinophobia
Someone once proposed -- I think they pronounce it a law -- that
once the
word Hitler appears in the debate
The actual law was that the first person to bring up Hitler was
automatically the loser of the debate. Since no one mentioned Stalin
until LP brought it up, does that mean this applies to him?
Michael Perelman wrote:
Someone once proposed -- I think they pronounce it a law -- that once the
14 matches
Mail list logo
