From: Michael Keaney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The troubles with technical trends
Professionals have lost sight of the risks but cannot blame day traders
for the outcome, writes Barry Riley
Financial Times, Oct 05 2001
... Now there is a global economic recession in the offing. It has become
evident
At 01:51 AM 10/6/01 +, you wrote:
the golden rule
remains that an Al cut is worth a four-day rally. I really don't know why the
man bothers ...
in theory, he doesn't care about what happens to the stock market (or
shouldn't care). He's supposedly trying to help Main Street, not Wall
In which theory??
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 10:56:39AM -0700, Jim Devine wrote:
in theory, he doesn't care about what happens to the stock market (or
shouldn't care). He's supposedly trying to help Main Street, not Wall Street.
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 10:56:39AM -0700, I wrote:
in theory, he [Alan Greedspan] doesn't care about what happens to the
stock market (or
shouldn't care). He's supposedly trying to help Main Street, not Wall
Street.
At 12:28 PM 10/5/01 -0700, you wrote:
In which theory??
the one that
This year has shown that inventory-free companies do not escape the
business cycle or disruptions in demand
Financial Times, 25 September 2001
Peter Martin
There are really only two types of business: those with inventory and
those without.
In recent years, inventory-heavy businesses have
Jim wrote:
BTW, some economists argue that even service-providers _in effect_ have
inventories. Excess supply in a service industry will show up as excess
capacity [e.g., unused airplanes] or as 'inventory' of underutilized
employees. -- Baily Friedman, MACROECONOMICS, 2nd ed, p. 66.
This
This is very interesting. I have never seen the demand growth rate figures
before. The increasing reliance on imports makes this situation seem even more
threatening to economic health.
Keaney Michael wrote:
The death of demand
Financial Times, Jun 25, 2001
By GLOBAL INVESTOR - ANDREW
I haven't read the Challenge article yet, but so far everything I have read
about the "new economy" sounds like smoke and mirrors to me. It also seems
like this "new economy" is about to take a bath just like plain old economies
do all the time in capitalism. maggie coleman
Michael Perelman
At 09:06 PM 01/31/2001 -0600, you wrote:
I haven't read the Challenge article yet, but so far everything I have read
about the "new economy" sounds like smoke and mirrors to me. It also seems
like this "new economy" is about to take a bath just like plain old economies
do all the time in
This is the peace process
'The alternative to the peace process is no longer hypothetical. It is
unfolding today before our eyes', said President Clinton. But the
fighting in Jerusalem, Gaza and the West Bank is not a departure from
the Peace Process, it is its obvious conclusion. The Peace
At 13:37 13/06/00 -0700, you wrote:
they are supposed to show that capitalism is not the capitalism of free
trade.
Mine Doyran
SUNY/Albany
So do you refuse to give answers to my questions?
Brad DeLong
Although there are strong monopoly features in global capitalism, these
figures do not
I do *not* remember getting this message because my account was
full so Brad's question probably bounced back. Can you repost the
rest of your post?
Chris, I understand what you say but the article is not suggesting that
the world economy is charecterized by monopoly capitalism.
This not my
Is this a claim that Algerian standards of living would rise by 47%
if Algeria were to shut off all trade with the rest of the world, and
that standards of living in Zimbabwe would rise by 56% if Zimbabwe
were to shut off all trade with the rest of the world?
The author himself writes in the
13 matches
Mail list logo
