Re: Section 7(a)

1998-03-20 Thread Michael Perelman
Paul asked why the state should be frightened. he said (we're talking 1932 and early 1993, I guess) Capitalism was discredited at the time. The whole class configuration had shifted. The state certainly could not blame the economic disorder on the unions at the time. -- Michael Perelman

Re: Section 7(a)

1998-03-20 Thread Ellen Dannin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are a few sources for information on these events that have not so far been mentioned. James Gross (Cornell labor historian) has written a multi-volume history of the NLRA and NLRB. Jim Pope (Rutgers Law school) is currently doing an analysis of s.7(a). And related but slightly off

Re: Section 7(a)

1998-03-19 Thread Paul Zarembka
://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka On Thu, 19 Mar 1998, Terrence Mc Donough wrote: Paul Z asks about section 7(a) of the National Industrial Recovery Act, which guaranteed the right to organize in covered industries. 7(a) was included in the bill in order to forstall the more radical

Section 7(a)

1998-03-19 Thread Terrence Mc Donough
Paul Z asks about section 7(a) of the National Industrial Recovery Act, which guaranteed the right to organize in covered industries. 7(a) was included in the bill in order to forstall the more radical Black Bill which had been reported onto the floor of the house and contained not only