Re: threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California

2003-12-03 Thread Doug Henwood
Michael Perelman wrote: Shocking that the movie hero needs to pick on the weakest most vulnerable. Not just the disabled. Outreach for disadvantaged students. Health care for the poor. Also, Berkeley's labor studies program. So far, not one hit on the middle class or their betters. That's no

Re: threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California

2003-12-03 Thread Devine, James
Michael Perelman wrote: Shocking that the movie hero needs to pick on the weakest most vulnerable. Not just the disabled. Outreach for disadvantaged students. Health care for the poor. Also, Berkeley's labor studies program. So far, not one hit on the middle class or their betters. Doug

Re: threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California

2003-12-03 Thread Jurriaan Bendien
Henwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 6:48 PM Subject: Re: [PEN-L] threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California Michael Perelman wrote: Shocking that the movie hero needs to pick on the weakest most vulnerable. Not just the disabled. Outreach

Re: threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California

2003-12-03 Thread Eugene Coyle
What these cuts are about is forcing the liberals to defend the weakest -- which constituency Arnold doesn't really want to cut because it would be bad politically. Arnold wants the liberals to spend time and money protecting something he really can't destroy, so that they have to give in to him

Re: threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California

2003-12-03 Thread Jurriaan Bendien
What these cuts are about is forcing the liberals to defend the weakest -- which constituency Arnold doesn't really want to cut because it would be bad politically. Arnold wants the liberals to spend time and money protecting something he really can't destroy, so that they have to give in to

Re: threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California

2003-12-03 Thread Jurriaan Bendien
Perhaps another way of looking at it is this: why lend money to build gigantic prisons, when you could lend money to put people who are likely to commit criminal activities into jobs, that generate new income and tax revenue and thus help balance the budget ? I mean if you pauperise people so that

Re: threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California

2003-12-03 Thread Seth Sandronsky
Re: threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California by Jurriaan Bendien 03 December 2003 Perhaps another way of looking at it is this: why lend money to build gigantic prisons, when you could lend money to put people who are likely to commit criminal activities into jobs, that generate new

Re: threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California

2003-12-03 Thread Doug Henwood
Jurriaan wrote: Perhaps another way of looking at it is this: why lend money to build gigantic prisons, when you could lend money to put people who are likely to commit criminal activities into jobs, that generate new income and tax revenue and thus help balance the budget ? As Business Week

Re: threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California

2003-12-03 Thread Devine, James
. There has been a kind of Keynesian effect. See also Richard D. Vogel's piece in the Sept. 2003 edition of Monthly Review http://www.monthlyreview.org/0903vogel.htm. Seth Sandronsky Re: threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California by Jurriaan Bendien 03 December 2003 Perhaps

Re: threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California

2003-12-03 Thread Jurriaan Bendien
: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 11:56 PM Subject: Re: [PEN-L] threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California Hi Jurriaan, In 'Lockdown America,' Christian Parenti partly analyzes policing and prison-building in California. There has been a kind of Keynesian effect. See also Richard D. Vogel's

Re: threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California

2003-12-03 Thread Jurriaan Bendien
As Business Week editorialized sometime around 1947 (and I'm paraphrasing a bit), government spending on the military reinforces existing hierarchies, while social spending undermines them. Ditto prisons. Hi Doug, hope things are working out. I'm not against all hierarchy, you know, the

Re: threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California

2003-12-03 Thread Carrol Cox
Doug Henwood wrote: Jurriaan wrote: Perhaps another way of looking at it is this: why lend money to build gigantic prisons, when you could lend money to put people who are likely to commit criminal activities into jobs, that generate new income and tax revenue and thus help balance the

threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California

2003-12-02 Thread Devine, James
[strangely, no mention is made concerning cut-backs of benefits for those disabled by over-use of steroids.] Plan to Limit Aid Alarms Advocates For Disabled in California [By Alexa H. Bluth for the Sacramento Bee.] http://www.sacbee.com/content/politics/story/7863657p-8803833c.html Advocates

Re: threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California

2003-12-02 Thread Doyle Saylor
Hello All, Quoting James Devine who forwards an article on disability cutbacks in California by the lamentable Schwarzenegger: [strangely, no mention is made concerning cut-backs of benefits for those disabled by over-use of steroids.] Doyle, Just to keep it as clear as possible, putting disabled

Re: threatened cut-backs for the disabled in California

2003-12-02 Thread Michael Perelman
Shocking that the movie hero needs to pick on the weakest most vulnerable. Not just the disabled. Outreach for disadvantaged students. Health care for the poor. Also, Berkeley's labor studies program. So far, not one hit on the middle class or their betters. -- Michael Perelman Economics