what's in a name?

2002-10-11 Thread Devine, James
Title: what's in a name? I propose a name for the recent resolution, passed by the Congresscritters in the D of C: the Gulf of Texaco resolution. Jim

Re: what's in a name?

2002-10-11 Thread Eugene Coyle
sounds good. How about "The Shell game" if they don't go for yours? Gene "Devine, James" wrote: I propose a name for the recent resolution, passed by the Congresscritters in the D of C: "the Gulf of Texaco resolution." Jim

Homosexuality and What's in a Name?

2000-12-05 Thread Yoshie Furuhashi
Gary MacLennan wrote: 2. Were there homosexuals back then? I especially enjoyed the posts around the history of homosexuality and homophobia. I am vividly reminded about the first time I used the word "homophobia" in a lecture sometime in the early 80s. The students stopped me and asked me

[PEN-L:301] What's in a name?

1998-09-30 Thread Tom Walker
Long-Term Capital, Ltd. is an ironic name for a company that specializes in highly leveraged derivatives. It's proof, I guess, of a kind of humourous aknowledgement among the players in this last hand of the capital game that it is, indeed the LAST HAND. Anything goes because the casino is about

Re: what's in a name?

1998-03-24 Thread Wojtek Sokolowski
At 02:36 PM 3/20/98 -0800, Jim Devine wrote inter alia: I think the main simplication of CAPITAL is that there Marx assumes away the independent dynamics of working-class movements. The book is about capital's dynamics largely holding working class organization constant (holding the

Re: what's in a name?

1998-03-24 Thread Wojtek Sokolowski
At 09:01 AM 3/21/98 -0500, you wrote: A mild intervention in the following discussion. I agree with Wogtek's emphasis on examining the actual structural features of individual socio-economic regimes. However, I note that in his `variation within' versus `variation between' analysis of whether

Re: what's in a name?

1998-03-24 Thread Ricardo Duchesne
Date sent: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 10:02:38 -0800 Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: James Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: what's in a name? What discussions of the relative autonomy of the state indicate is that sometimes

the state [was: what's in a name?]

1998-03-24 Thread James Devine
I had written: What discussions of the relative autonomy of the state indicate is that sometimes the state does much more than that [i.e., protect capitalist property relations]. Ricardo D responds: Yes, the relative autonomy of the state is a well established idea within marxist theory,

Re: what's in a name?

1998-03-24 Thread James Devine
At 11:05 AM 3/24/98 -0500, Wojtek wrote: I would add to it [my own contribution] another simplification [that Marx made], the "classical" concept of the state as the executive committee and the policeman protecting private property. Marx did not anticipate the role of the state as the Keynesian

Re: what's in a name?

1998-03-20 Thread boddhisatva
To whom..., Mr. Sokolowski's post illustrates the misconception that socialism and a command economy are anything like the same animal. If socialism was a command economy, then it would be true that the difference between socialism and capitalism was a matter of

Re: what's in a name?

1998-03-20 Thread Wojtek Sokolowski
At 02:44 PM 3/20/98 -0500, Rakesh Bhandari wrote: Yes,it is one thing to study motion in a vacuum and then to determine the modification of motion by air pressure or viscosity. So Marx may have initially assumed a closed capitalist society, without foreign trade or vestigal or intermediate

Re: what's in a name?

1998-03-20 Thread James Devine
Wojtek wrote: It is one thing to say that Marxist theory explains some important aspects of capitalist relations of production (which I think it does), quite a differnt thing to determine to what degree those capitalist relations of production ar implemented in actual societies and to what

Re: what's in a name?

1998-03-20 Thread Rakesh Bhandari
In yet another bolt of clarity Wojtek reminded us It is one thing to say that Marxist theory explains some important aspects of capitalist relations of production (which I think it does), quite a differnt thing to determine to what degree those capitalist relations of production ar implemented

Re: what's in a name?

1998-03-20 Thread Wojtek Sokolowski
At 12:46 PM 3/20/98 -0500, you wrote: Mr. Sokolowski's post illustrates the misconception that socialism and a command economy are anything like the same animal. If socialism was a command economy, then it would be true that the difference between socialism and capitalism was a matter of

Re: what's in a name?

1998-03-19 Thread Wojtek Sokolowski
At 05:36 AM 3/19/98 -0500, David Fasenfest wrote: It is certainly true that existing applied models of socialism has not successfully competed with capitalism even as we argue over whether it was a failure of socialism or its defeat by capitalism which explains that end. However, the discussion