At 5:59 PM 11/20/96, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>Philip Kraft discusses the new VW plant in Resende, Brazil. The special
>section on technology in the Nov. 18 WSJ includes an article on Colgate
>which suggests the the new intranet software connecting not only all
>Colgate plants and employees around the world but also suppliers,
>retailers, etc., challenges the notion of the enterprise and raises the
>question what is inside and what is outside the firm.

In Coaseian terms, don't the VW and Colgate developments bring
subcontracting relationships within the firm, internalizing previously
market-like arrangements? And doesn't this also make it possible for
workers who were previously far apart to develop formal and informal
solidarity with each other?

>Also: different but related: re: the struggle between Norfolk Southern and
>CSX to buy Conrail. Pennsylvania state law affirms that enterprises need
>not sell to the highest bidder but can also consider the needs of state
>residents, customers and suppliers (read workers) in such matters. This too
>strikes a blow at the notion that the firm is well-bounded and its
>interests well-defined as "profit-maximization."

Doesn't this recall the Golden Age managerial literature, from Berle-Means
through Galbraith, which saw modern giant corporations as social actors
with broader social responsibilities than profit- and
stock-price-maximization?

>Also: the Texaco settlement with its African American employees includes
>the formation of a committee which comprises membership chosen half by the
>enterprise and half by the plaintiffs (and one person chosen by both) and
>is to have "unprecedented" power over personnel relations and policy, etc.
>A modernist notion of a firm is going to have more difficulty, I believe,
>integrating these kinds of developments than pomoish theories will.

What about German firm structure, with co-determination, dual boards, etc.?
Or Japanese keiretsu, with their cross-holdings and interlocking board
structures? Anglo-American governance structures are not the only way to
run capitalist enterprises.

I promise I won't quote Ecclesiastes.

Doug

--

Doug Henwood
Left Business Observer
250 W 85 St
New York NY 10024-3217
USA
+1-212-874-4020 voice
+1-212-874-3137 fax
email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
web: <http://www.panix.com/~dhenwood/LBO_home.html>


Reply via email to