Greetings Economists,
Tom's comment is correct about attachments. However, that seems to me to
point out another problem with email lists. Email is not designed to carry
graphical content. Web pages are more efficient means of communicating
collaborative graphical imagery. A portal based place
Has anyone else seen and opened the 483k attachment to Ralph Johansen's
post? I don't think such posts should be sent except after a preliminary
post announcing that they are coming and that they are virus-free?
Carrol
Yes, I have asked before not to send big things like this.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:15:47PM -0500, Carrol Cox wrote:
Has anyone else seen and opened the 483k attachment to Ralph Johansen's
post? I don't think such posts should be sent except after a preliminary
post announcing that they are
Title: RE: [PEN-L:31260] Re: Re: Columbus as prototype - after Guindon
It doesn't seem to have a virus, though. (I didn't save it. I just opened it. Norton didn't object. Nor did Kramden.)
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
Title: RE: [PEN-L:31260] Re: Re: Columbus as prototype - after Guindon
Criminentlies, cmrds, I am learning. I posted as original rather than as
attachment because I have correspondents who tell me they don't open attachments
or can't do so. But no more. I had no URL to send, because
Better: do not send attachments to a list. If you receive attachments do not
open them. Only open attachments if you know who they are coming from and
what they are.
Tom Walker
604 255 4812
