RE: On Mark to Rod, was Re: Re: re: energy

2000-06-29 Thread Max Sawicky
HE: . . . We intellectuals have to join the organizations of these committed workers and help them write a consistent programme how to avoid ecological catastrophe by a world wide proletarian revolution, and establish a minority dictatorship which will carry out this programme with Stalinist

Re: On Mark to Rod, was Re: Re: re: energy

2000-06-29 Thread M A Jones
: "Hans Ehrbar" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 3:57 PM Subject: [PEN-L:20939] On Mark to Rod, was Re: Re: re: energy On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:10:45 -0500, Carrol Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: So unless you really do agree with Hans Ehrbar o

Re: RE: On Mark to Rod, was Re: Re: re: energy

2000-06-29 Thread Anthony DCosta
PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L:20946] RE: On Mark to Rod, was Re: Re: re: energy HE: . . . We intellectuals have to join the organizations of these committed workers and help them write a consistent programme how to avoid ecological catastrophe

On Mark to Rod, was Re: Re: re: energy

2000-06-29 Thread Hans Ehrbar
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 18:10:45 -0500, Carrol Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: So unless you really do agree with Hans Ehrbar on the need for an elitist putsch to stop global warming, you had better give some thought to how that mass support can be (beginning now) marshalled It is not my view

On Mark to Rod, was Re: Re: re: energy

2000-06-28 Thread Carrol Cox
M A Jones wrote: Rod, I'd be happy to debate you but metaphysical assertions about 'infinite energy' which are easily + demonstrably untrue, are not a basis for debate. So yes, quit this silly non-debate. Mark, I agree with this in substance, but much of my caterwauling at you and Lou